Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 1/3 — Method: find non-fiction's fraction of the whole, then multiply by the fraction of non-fiction that is history. Working: total parts = 4 + 5 = 9, so non-fiction is 5/9 of all books. History books are 3/5 of the non-fiction books: 3/5 × 5/9 = 15/45 = 1/3. Answer: 1/3. 3/5 comes from giving the fraction of non-fiction books that are history, without relating it to all the books at the fair. 5/9 comes from stopping after finding the fraction of all books that are non-fiction, without finding the history books within that. 4/15 comes from multiplying 3/5 by the fraction that is fiction (4/9) instead of the fraction that is non-fiction (5/9).
- (b) −23 — Expand two of the three brackets first: (x + 5)(x − 2) = x² + 3x − 10. Then multiply this by the remaining bracket: (2x − 1)(x² + 3x − 10) = 2x³ + 6x² − 20x − x² − 3x + 10, which simplifies to 2x³ + 5x² − 23x + 10, so the coefficient of x is −23. Writing −13 comes from a sign slip in the first expansion, combining 5x − 2x as −5x − 2x = −7x instead of +3x, which carries through to a wrong final coefficient. Writing −20 comes from forgetting to distribute the −1 across every term of x² + 3x − 10, dropping the −1 × 3x = −3x contribution. Writing 10 comes from reading off the constant term of the expansion instead of the coefficient of x.
- (a) The gradient is 3; the candidate's method is right. — The gradient of a tangent, like any straight line, is the change in y divided by the change in x between two points on it. Here the tangent passes through (1, 2) and (5, 14), so the change in y is 14 − 2 = 12 and the change in x is 5 − 1 = 4. The gradient is 12 ÷ 4 = 3, so the candidate's calculation is correct. Subtracting in the wrong order, (2 − 14) ÷ (5 − 1), gives −12 ÷ 4 = −3, the wrong sign. Adding the two changes instead of dividing them, 12 + 4 = 16, does not find a gradient at all. Dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round, 4 ÷ 12 = 1/3, inverts the calculation completely. Before accepting or rejecting a claimed gradient, always redo the calculation yourself in the same order — change in y over change in x — rather than trusting the arithmetic as given.
- (a) £4.20 — 350 g is 3.5 lots of 100 g, since 350 ÷ 100 = 3.5, so the cost is 3.5 × £1.20 = £4.20. Multiplying the mass in grams directly by the price, without dividing by 100 first, gives £420.00. Working out 100 ÷ 350 instead of 350 ÷ 100 inverts the ratio and gives about £0.34. Rounding 350 g down to 300 g gives 3 × £1.20 = £3.60.
- (d) 19/100 — It is easier to first find the probability that NEITHER component is faulty, then subtract from 1. The probability a component is not faulty is 9/10, so the probability neither is faulty is 9/10 × 9/10 = 81/100. So the probability at least one is faulty is 1 − 81/100 = 19/100. Choosing 1/5 comes from adding the two probabilities of a fault instead, 1/10 + 1/10 = 1/5, which double-counts the case where both are faulty. Choosing 1/10 comes from giving the probability for just one component being faulty. Choosing 1/100 comes from squaring the probability of a fault directly, 1/10 × 1/10 = 1/100, which is actually the probability that BOTH are faulty, not at least one.
- (b) 29 — There are 40 − 24 = 16 males, and 15 of them prefer cardio, so 16 − 15 = 1 male prefers weights. There are 24 females, and 10 prefer weights, so 24 − 10 = 14 females prefer cardio. Altogether, 15 + 14 = 29 people prefer cardio. Choosing 15 only counts the males who prefer cardio and forgets the females. Choosing 11 adds the two weights figures, 1 + 10 = 11, instead of the two cardio figures. Choosing 30 comes from 40 − 10, subtracting only the number of females who prefer weights from the grand total, rather than finding both cardio sub-totals separately.
- (a) 7 — Convert the mixed number to an improper fraction: 5 1/4 = 21/4. Dividing by 3/4 means multiplying by its reciprocal, 4/3: 21/4 × 4/3 gives 84/12, which simplifies to 7. So exactly 7 complete pieces of 3/4 m can be cut. Ignoring the 1/4 m and dividing only the whole number, 5 ÷ 3/4, gives 20/3, which is 6 complete pieces with some wood left over. Multiplying by 3/4 instead of its reciprocal, 21/4 × 3/4, gives 63/16, which is 3 complete pieces. Misreading 5 1/4 as the fraction 5/4, then dividing by 3/4, gives 5/3, which is only 1 complete piece. So 7 complete pieces can be cut from the plank.
- (b) 58.8 km/h — Total distance = 100 + 47 = 147 km. Total time = 1.5 + 0.25 + 0.75 = 2.5 hours. Average speed = 147 ÷ 2.5 = 58.8 km/h. Leaving out the 0.25 hours of waiting from the total time gives 147 ÷ 2.25 = 65.3 km/h (1 d.p.) — wrong, because the train is stationary but time is still passing on the whole journey. Using only the first leg gives 100 ÷ 1.5 = 66.7 km/h (1 d.p.) — wrong, because it ignores the second leg of the journey entirely. Working out each leg's own speed (100 ÷ 1.5 = 66.7 km/h and 47 ÷ 0.75 = 62.7 km/h) and then averaging those two speeds gives 64.7 km/h (1 d.p.) — wrong, because the average of two speeds over DIFFERENT times is not the same as total distance divided by total time.
- (a) 60 minutes — Method: for inverse proportion, printers × time is constant. Working: 6 × 40 = 240 (the constant). With 4 printers: 240 ÷ 4 = 60 minutes. Wrong options: 26.7 minutes comes from treating the relationship as direct proportion, scaling the time down as printers decrease (40 × 4 ÷ 6); 24 minutes comes from multiplying the two printer counts together instead of using the constant; 40 minutes comes from not adjusting the time at all for the change in printers.
- (d) 114.6° — Method: rearrange Area = (1/2)ab sin C to make sin C the subject, then use the obtuse branch since the question states the angle is obtuse. Working: sin C = 2 × 45 ÷ (11 × 9) = 0.909, so the acute angle is sin⁻¹(0.909) = 65.4°, and the obtuse angle is 180 − 65.4 = 114.6°. Answer: 114.6°. Giving the acute angle straight from the calculator, 65.4°, ignores that the question asks for the obtuse one; forgetting to double the area before dividing gives sin C = 45 ÷ (11 × 9) = 0.4545, whose obtuse angle is 180 − 27.0 = 153.0°; and that same forgotten-doubling error taken on the acute branch instead gives 27.0°. Always double the area first, and then take 180° minus the calculator's answer whenever the question specifically asks for the obtuse angle.
- (d) 1/5 — Method: list the pairs systematically, work out each total, then count the pairs that meet the condition and compare that count with the length of the list. Working: the pairs and their totals are 1 and 2 giving 3, 1 and 3 giving 4, 1 and 4 giving 5, 1 and 5 giving 6, 2 and 3 giving 5, 2 and 4 giving 6, 2 and 5 giving 7, 3 and 4 giving 7, 3 and 5 giving 8, and 4 and 5 giving 9. That is 10 pairs, of which 2 have a total of more than 7. Answer: the probability is 1/5. The distractors: 2/5 comes from counting the totals of exactly 7 as well, reading 'more than 7' as '7 or more'; 1/10 comes from finding only the pair 4 and 5 and missing that 3 and 5 also beat 7; 4/5 comes from counting the pairs on the wrong side of the condition, the 8 pairs whose total is 7 or less.
- (b) 3/5 — Method: add all three parts for the total, add together the parts that are not green, then write this over the total. Working: total parts = 4 + 5 + 6 = 15. Not green = 4 + 5 = 9. Fraction = 9/15 = 3/5. Answer: 3/5. 2/5 comes from finding the fraction that IS green (6/15 = 2/5) instead of not green. 4/15 comes from only counting the red baubles as 'not green' and forgetting the gold ones. 9/10 comes from adding only two of the three ratio parts to find the total (4+6=10), missing out the gold part, while still using 9 for the numerator.
- (d) 28 — The height decreases by 8 cm at each bounce after the first, so the nth bounce reaches 60−(n−1)×8 cm. For the 5th bounce: 60−4×8=60−32=28. A candidate who subtracts 8 one time too many, five times instead of four, would compute 60−5×8=20. A candidate who adds the decrease instead of subtracting it, a sign error, would compute 60+4×8=92. A candidate who works out only the total decrease and forgets to include the starting height of 60 cm would compute just 5×8=40.
- (c) 183 mg — Apply the decay, then add the new dose, once for each hour. Hour 1: 0.7 × 200 = 140, then 140 + 50 = 190. Hour 2: 0.7 × 190 = 133, then 133 + 50 = 183, so there is 183 mg after 2 hours. Forgetting the top-up dose and only applying the decay gives 0.7 × 200 = 140, then 0.7 × 140 = 98 — this ignores that a further 50 mg is given every hour. Adding the 50 mg BEFORE the decay is applied, instead of after, gives 0.7 × (200 + 50) = 175, then 0.7 × (175 + 50) = 157.5, which changes how much of the dose is eliminated in the same hour it is given. Multiplying by 0.3, the percentage ELIMINATED, instead of by 0.7, the percentage REMAINING, gives 0.3 × 200 + 50 = 110, then 0.3 × 110 + 50 = 83 — this mixes up the amount that leaves the bloodstream with the amount that stays in it. Always check whether a percentage describes what remains or what is removed before choosing the multiplier.
- (d) 15 cm² — Method: identify the length that is common to both views, since it is the box's length; then read off the width from the plan view and the height from the front elevation, and multiply those two measurements to find the area of the side elevation. Working: both rectangles share a side of 8 cm, which is the box's length; the plan view's other side gives a width of 5 cm, and the front elevation's other side gives a height of 3 cm. The side elevation is bounded by the width and the height: 5 cm × 3 cm = 15 cm². Answer: 15 cm². The distractors: 24 cm² comes from giving the area of the front elevation shown (8 cm × 3 cm) instead of working out a new rectangle for the side elevation. 40 cm² comes from giving the area of the plan view shown (8 cm × 5 cm) instead of working out the side elevation. 120 cm² comes from multiplying all three measurements together (8 cm × 5 cm × 3 cm), finding the volume of the box instead of the area of one face.
- (a) Positive x-direction, 90°; image is y = sin x. — Writing cos(x − 90°) as cos(x − a) with a = 90 shows this is a horizontal translation, y = f(x − a), which moves the graph 90° in the positive x-direction; the identity cos(x − 90°) = sin x confirms the image is y = sin x. Choosing the negative x-direction reverses the sign inside the bracket — subtracting inside the bracket always translates in the positive x-direction, not the negative one, so that statement is wrong on direction. Getting the direction right but conflating the subtraction inside the bracket with an extra reflection of the output flips the sign of the resulting graph, wrongly giving y = −sin x. Treating the subtraction as if it changed the output directly, rather than the input, wrongly calls this a vertical translation even while still correctly recalling that the image simplifies to y = sin x.
- (d) 5:3:2 — German = 100% − 50% − 30% = 20%. The ratio 50 : 30 : 20 simplifies by dividing every part by 10 to give 5 : 3 : 2.
- (c) 37.6 m² — Triangle ABC has a right angle at B, so use Pythagoras' theorem to find AC: AC² = AB² + BC² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169, so AC = 13 m. In triangle ACD, use Area = 1/2 × AC × AD × sin(angle CAD) = 1/2 × 13 × 9 × sin 40° = 58.5 × 0.6428 = 37.6 m² (1 d.p.). Adding AB and BC to get AC = 17 m instead of applying Pythagoras gives 1/2 × 17 × 9 × sin 40° = 49.2 m². Using cos 40° instead of sin 40° gives 1/2 × 13 × 9 × cos 40° = 44.8 m². Substituting AB = 5 m directly instead of finding AC first gives 1/2 × 5 × 9 × sin 40° = 14.5 m².
- (a) Outside: OQ² = 221 > r² = 169 — OQ² = 10² + 11² = 100 + 121 = 221. Comparing this with r² = 169: since 221 > 169, OQ > r, so Q lies outside the circle — this is the correct verdict AND the correct working. 'Outside: OQ = 21 (10 + 11) > r = 13' reaches the same Outside verdict, but by invalid working: it adds the coordinates instead of squaring them (10 + 11 = 21, rather than 10² + 11² = 221), so the stated 'OQ' of 21 is not a distance at all — the verdict happens to match, but the method is wrong. 'Inside: OQ ≈ 14.87 < r² = 169' correctly finds the distance OQ = √221 ≈ 14.87, but then compares that DISTANCE with r² = 169 instead of with r = 13 — comparing two different kinds of quantity gives a meaningless, and here wrong, verdict. 'Inside: OQ² = 221 < (2r)² = 676' confuses the radius with the diameter: it compares OQ² with the diameter squared, (2 × 13)² = 676, instead of with r² = 169.
- (b) n² + 4n — First differences of 5, 12, 21, 32, 45 are 7, 9, 11, 13. Second differences are 2, 2, 2, so a = 2 ÷ 2 = 1. Subtracting n² (1, 4, 9, 16, 25) from the totals (5, 12, 21, 32, 45) leaves 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, the linear expression 4n. So the number of oranges is n² + 4n. Using the second difference itself as the coefficient of n², without halving it, gives 2n² + 4n. Finding a = 1 correctly but dropping the linear remainder 4n entirely leaves n². Treating the first first difference (7) as a constant common difference and building a linear formula 5 + 7(n − 1) = 7n − 2 fits only the first two totals, and gives 19 for n = 3 instead of 21.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.