Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 3 × 10⁶ — Daily revenue = (4 × 10³) × 2.5 = 1 × 10⁴ (£10,000). Multiplying by the number of days, (3 × 10²), gives annual revenue = (1 × 10⁴) × (3 × 10²) = 3 × 10⁶ (£3,000,000). A candidate who forgot to multiply by the price and just multiplied the number of items by the number of days worked out (4 × 10³) × (3 × 10²) = 1.2 × 10⁶. A candidate who added the number of days to the daily revenue instead of multiplying worked out 1 × 10⁴ + 3 × 10² = 1.03 × 10⁴. A candidate who misread £2.50 as £25 worked out a daily revenue of (4 × 10³) × 25 = 1 × 10⁵, giving an annual total of (1 × 10⁵) × (3 × 10²) = 3 × 10⁷.
- (d) x = 4 and x = −4 — Substituting y = 3 gives x² + 9 = 25, which simplifies to x² = 16, so x = 4 or x = −4. Choosing 'x = 3 and x = −3' uses the given value y = 3 as if it were the x-coordinate. Choosing 'x = 4' alone finds the positive square root of 16 but forgets the negative root. Choosing 'x = 5 and x = −5' skips subtracting 3² = 9 from 25 and takes the square root of 25 directly.
- (c) 3 : 5 — If orange juice is 3/8 of the total, apple juice is the remaining 1 − 3/8 = 5/8. The ratio of orange to apple is therefore 3 : 5. Inverting gives 5 : 3, apple to orange instead of orange to apple. Using the denominator 8 as the second part of the ratio, 3 : 8, compares orange juice to the whole drink rather than to the apple juice alone. Pairing the total 8 with the apple fraction's numerator 5 gives 8 : 5, which mixes a whole-total figure with a part figure.
- (b) (−2, −1) — Method: apply the reflection to the point first, then rotate the image about the given centre, in the order the question states them. Working: reflecting (3, 4) in the line y = 1 keeps x = 3 and puts the image as far below the line as the point is above it: 4 is 3 units above y = 1, so the image is 3 units below, at 1 − 3 = −2 (the same as 2 × 1 − 4 = −2). The reflected point is (3, −2). Rotating (3, −2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1): subtracting the centre gives 3 − 1 = 2 and −2 − 1 = −3, the clockwise rule swaps and negates these to give −3 and −2, and adding the centre back gives 1 + (−3) = −2 and 1 + (−2) = −1. The final image is (−2, −1). Answer: (−2, −1). Reflect before you rotate, exactly as the design process is described, and rotate about the CENTRE (1, 1) given in the question rather than the origin: either mistake, or reversing the two steps, sends the tile to a different point.
- (b) 1/4 — There are 6 × 2 = 12 equally likely outcomes. The even-numbered cards are 2, 4 and 6, so there are 3 × 1 = 3 outcomes with an even card and tails, giving a probability of 3/12 = 1/4. Choosing 1/2 comes from working out only the probability of drawing an even card, 3/6, and forgetting to combine it with the coin landing on tails. Choosing 1/12 comes from treating only one specific outcome, such as card 6 with tails, as the only one that counts, instead of all three even cards paired with tails. Choosing 1/8 comes from doubling the coin stage when counting the total, using 6 × 2 × 2 = 24 outcomes instead of 6 × 2 = 12, and giving 3/24 = 1/8.
- (c) 46 — Method: the cumulative frequency table gives the number of runners below each time; to find the number at or above a time, subtract that cumulative frequency from the total. Working: the cumulative frequency for t < 40 is 74, so 120 runners in total take away the 74 who finished in under 40 minutes: 120 − 74 = 46. Answer: 46 runners took 40 minutes or longer. Watch which boundary and which subtraction you use: reading off t < 50 instead of t < 40 and subtracting, 120 − 110 = 10, answers a different question, '50 minutes or longer'; giving 74 itself as the answer reports how many finished below 40 minutes, the opposite of what was asked; and subtracting the two nearby cumulative frequencies, 110 − 74 = 36, finds how many took between 40 and 50 minutes, not everyone from 40 minutes upward.
- (d) 40 miles — Method: round each number to 1 significant figure first, then divide to estimate the daily distance. Working: 830 rounds to 800, and 19 rounds to 20, and 800 ÷ 20 = 40, so the estimate is 40 miles per day. 41.5 miles comes from rounding only the number of days and working out 830 ÷ 20 = 41.5, without rounding the distance too. 830 miles is the total distance for the whole trek, given as the answer without dividing by the number of days at all. 4 miles comes from working out 80 ÷ 20 = 4, misplacing a digit in the rounded distance. Answer: 40 miles.
- (a) x = 3/2 or x = −3/2 — Method: the equation has an x² term and a number but no x term, so make x² the subject and then take the square root of both sides, keeping the negative root as well as the positive one. Working: adding 9 to both sides of 4x² − 9 = 0 gives 4x² = 9, and dividing both sides by 4 gives x² = 9/4. Square-rooting the top and the bottom of 9/4 gives 3/2, so x = 3/2 or x = −3/2, and each value checks out because 4 × 9/4 − 9 = 0. Answer: x = 3/2 or x = −3/2. The distractors: x = 3 or x = −3 comes from square-rooting both sides of 4x² = 9 without first dividing by the 4, so the coefficient of x² is ignored; x = 9/4 or x = −9/4 comes from stopping at x² = 9/4 and writing that value down as x, leaving the square root undone; x = 3/2 only comes from taking the positive square root of 9/4 and losing the negative solution.
- (b) 5:8 — The mix has 5 parts sand and 3 parts cement, so 5 + 3 = 8 parts in total. Sand to total is 5 : 8, and since the highest common factor of 5 and 8 is 1, this is already in its simplest form. Giving 5 : 3 answers sand to cement, not sand to the total mix. Giving 3 : 8 is cement to total, the wrong part of the mix. Giving 8 : 5 has the total and the sand swapped round.
- (b) 28 — Method: total bricks = (number of squares in the footprint) × (the height of the wall in bricks). Working: the footprint has the row of 5 squares plus the 2 squares in the arm that stands out from the middle of that row, and they do not overlap, giving 5 + 2 = 7 squares; multiplying by the height of 4 bricks gives 7 × 4 = 28. Answer: 28. The distractors: 20 comes from using only the row of 5 and ignoring the arm (5 × 4). 24 comes from treating the bottom square of the arm as if it were one of the row's own squares, so the arm is counted as adding only 1 new square instead of 2 (5 + 1 = 6, then 6 × 4). 32 comes from counting the square of the row directly below the arm a second time as part of the arm (5 + 3 = 8, then 8 × 4).
- (d) 3/50 — Relative frequency is the number of faulty bolts divided by the total sample size: 15/250, which simplifies to 3/50 by dividing both the numerator and the denominator by 5. Using 235, the number of bolts that were NOT faulty, as the denominator instead of the total 250 gives 15/235, which simplifies to 3/47. Inverting the fraction, dividing the total by the number of faulty bolts instead of the other way round, gives 250/15, which simplifies to 50/3 — a value greater than 1, which cannot be a probability. Simplifying by dividing the numerator and the denominator by different numbers, 15 ÷ 15 = 1 and 250 ÷ 25 = 10, gives 1/10.
- (c) 0.5, 0.45, −0.09, −0.15, −0.6 — Method: compare the decimals by their position on a number line, remembering that with negative decimals the one closer to zero is larger. Working: 0.5 and 0.45 are positive, so they come first, with 0.5 the larger of the two. Among the negatives, −0.09 is closest to zero, then −0.15, then −0.6 is furthest from zero and so the smallest. Answer: 0.5, 0.45, −0.09, −0.15, −0.6. 0.5, 0.45, −0.15, −0.09, −0.6 swaps −0.09 and −0.15, treating the negative decimal with more digits after the point as closer to zero. −0.6, −0.15, −0.09, 0.45, 0.5 lists the numbers from smallest to largest instead of largest to smallest. 0.5, 0.45, −0.6, −0.15, −0.09 orders the negative decimals by the size of the digit (0.6 > 0.15 > 0.09) as if they were positive, instead of recognising that a bigger negative decimal is further from zero and so smaller.
- (c) x + 2y = 6 — L has gradient 2, so the perpendicular gradient is −1/2. Substituting (4, 1) into y − 1 = −(1/2)(x − 4): y = −(1/2)x + 2 + 1 = −(1/2)x + 3, so 2y = −x + 6, giving x + 2y = 6. Distractor routes: x − 2y = 2 comes from using gradient +1/2 instead of −1/2, forgetting the negative sign the perpendicular rule needs. x + 2y = 9 comes from swapping the point's coordinates, substituting (1, 4) instead of (4, 1). x + 2y = −2 comes from a sign error distributing the negative gradient over the bracket, computing −(1/2)(x − 4) as −(1/2)x − 2 instead of −(1/2)x + 2.
- (d) The 750 g box, at 36p per 100 g — Work out the cost per 100 g of each box. 750 g box: 270p ÷ 7.5 = 36p per 100 g. 500 g box: 195p ÷ 5 = 39p per 100 g. The lower cost per 100 g is the better value, so the 750 g box at 36p per 100 g is the answer. Choosing the 500 g box at 39p per 100 g gets the maths right but picks the higher unit price, not realising a smaller cost per 100 g is the better deal. Choosing the 500 g box because £1.95 is lower than £2.70 compares the total prices without allowing for the different pack sizes at all. Working out 270 ÷ 5 = 54p divides the 750 g box's price by the wrong number of hundred-grams (the 500 g box's), giving a rate that belongs to neither box. The 750 g box, at 36p per 100 g, is the better value.
- (c) 1.44 m³ — The cross-section is a triangle, so its area = base × height ÷ 2. Base × height = 1.2 × 0.8 = 0.96 m², and half of that is 0.96 ÷ 2 = 0.48 m². The volume of the prism = cross-sectional area × length = 0.48 × 3 = 1.44 m³. A pupil who forgets to halve when finding the triangle's area gets 1.2 × 0.8 × 3 = 2.88 m³. A pupil who ignores the height altogether, treating the cross-section as base × length, gets 1.2 × 3 = 3.6 m³. A pupil who correctly finds the cross-sectional area but forgets to multiply by the length of the bed stops at 0.48 m³. The correct volume of soil is 1.44 m³.
- (d) 44 m — The trapezium rule between t = 2 and t = 5 uses only the speeds at t = 2, 3, 4 and 5 — 12, 15, 16 and 14 — with three strips of width 1: adding the first and last readings and twice the sum of the middle readings gives 12 + 14 + 2 × (15 + 16) = 88, and half of that is 44 m. Writing 68.5 m comes from applying the trapezium rule to the whole table, from t = 0 to t = 6, instead of restricting it to the interval t = 2 to t = 5 that the question asks for. Writing 28.5 m comes from forgetting to double the two middle readings, 15 and 16, in the trapezium rule formula. Writing 39 m comes from averaging only the first and last speeds in the interval, 12 and 14, and multiplying by the 3-second interval, ignoring the readings at t = 3 and t = 4 in between.
- (a) 15 cm — Take the square root of each part of the area ratio to find the length ratio: the square root of 4 is 2 and the square root of 25 is 5, giving a length ratio of 2 : 5. Multiply the smaller flag's height by the scale factor 5 ÷ 2 = 2.5: 6 × 2.5 = 15, so the larger flag is 15 cm tall. Giving 37.5 cm uses the area ratio, 25 ÷ 4 = 6.25, directly as the scale factor without square-rooting it first (6 × 6.25 = 37.5). Giving 2.4 cm applies the length ratio the wrong way round, scaling the smaller flag down by 2 ÷ 5 instead of up by 5 ÷ 2 (6 × 0.4 = 2.4). Giving 27 cm adds the difference between the two area-ratio numbers, 25 − 4 = 21, onto the smaller height instead of using it as a scale factor (6 + 21 = 27).
- (c) $\binom{2}{7}$ — First find the character's position after the first move: (−5 + 6, 2 + (−9)) = (1, −7). The second move takes it from (1, −7) to (3, 0), so subtract the current position from the target: (3 − 1, 0 − (−7)) = $\binom{2}{7}$. $\binom{8}{−2}$ works from the starting point (−5, 2) and ignores the first move — (3 − (−5), 0 − 2) = $\binom{8}{−2}$. $\binom{−2}{−7}$ subtracts the wrong way round, current position minus target, instead of target minus current position — (1 − 3, −7 − 0) = $\binom{−2}{−7}$. $\binom{4}{−7}$ adds the target's coordinates to the current position instead of subtracting — (1 + 3, −7 + 0) = $\binom{4}{−7}$.
- (d) 8 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 2000 + 800(n − 1), and find the smallest whole n for which it is greater than 7000. Working: 2000 + 800(n − 1) > 7000, so 800(n − 1) > 5000, giving n − 1 > 6.25. Since n − 1 must be a whole number, the smallest value is 7, so n = 8. Check: year 8's total is 2000 + 800 × 7 = 7600, which is more than £7000, while year 7's total is 2000 + 800 × 6 = 6800, which is not. Answer: year 8. 7 comes from rounding 6.25 to the nearest whole number, 6, and then adding 1, instead of rounding up to the next whole number before adding 1. 6 comes from using 6.25 rounded down to 6 as the year number directly, without adding the 1 needed to convert from the number of increases to the year number. 9 comes from adding one extra year beyond the year that already satisfies the condition.
- (d) 1 hour 32 minutes — T = 40 × 1.8 + 20 = 72 + 20 = 92 minutes. Since 92 = 60 + 32, the cooking time is 1 hour 32 minutes. A candidate who rounds the mass to 2 kg before substituting gets 40 × 2 + 20 = 100 minutes = 1 hour 40 minutes. A candidate who forgets to add the 20 minutes gets 40 × 1.8 = 72 minutes = 1 hour 12 minutes. A candidate who multiplies the mass by (40 + 20) = 60 instead of substituting into the formula gets 1.8 × 60 = 108 minutes = 1 hour 48 minutes.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.