Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) Sam is correct — The leading zeros in 0.070268 are not significant, so the first three significant figures are 7, 0 and 2. The next digit along is 6, and since 6 is 5 or more, the third significant figure rounds up from 2 to 3, giving 0.0703. This means Sam's answer is correct. Writing 0.070 keeps only 2 significant figures, one short of what was asked. Writing 0.0702 ignores the digit 6 that follows and leaves the third figure unrounded. Writing 0.0704 rounds the third figure up twice, as if a later digit had also pushed it up.
- (a) (4, −8), a minimum point — The transformation x → x + 1 inside f translates the graph 1 unit to the LEFT, so the x-coordinate becomes 5 − 1 = 4. The minus sign in front of f reflects the graph in the x-axis, so the y-coordinate becomes −8, and a reflection in the x-axis turns every maximum into a minimum, so (4, −8) is a minimum point. Writing '(4, −8), a maximum point' gets the coordinates right but forgets that a reflection in the x-axis swaps maximum and minimum points. Writing '(6, −8), a minimum point' comes from translating 1 unit to the RIGHT instead of the left — f(x + 1) always moves the graph in the negative x-direction. Writing '(4, 8), a minimum point' gets the x-coordinate and the type right, but forgets to actually negate the y-coordinate, even though it does correctly reclassify the point as a minimum.
- (b) 5 years — The recurrence P_{n+1} = 1.1P_n − 30 must be applied once per year, checking after each application whether the population has passed 460. Starting from P_0 = 400: 400 × 1.1 − 30 = 410, so P_1 = 410. Then 410 × 1.1 − 30 = 421, so P_2 = 421. Then 421 × 1.1 − 30 = 433.1, so P_3 = 433.1. Then 433.1 × 1.1 − 30 = 446.41, so P_4 = 446.41, which is still below 460. Then 446.41 × 1.1 − 30 = 461.051, so P_5 = 461.051, the first value above 460. The population first exceeds 460 after 5 complete years. Stopping at P_4 = 446.41 and reporting 4 years reports the last year the population was still below 460, not the first year it was above. Counting the starting value P_0 = 400 as a year of growth makes P_5 the sixth number in the list and gives 6 years, but P_0 is the population before any year has passed, so P_5 is reached after 5 years, not 6. Reading "exceed 460" as "exceed the starting population of 400" instead gives P_1 = 410, already above 400, and 1 year — but the threshold named in the question is 460, not the starting value, so always check every value against the number actually stated in the question.
- (a) 150° — The arc length is the same fraction of the circumference as the angle is of 360°. The full circumference is 2 × 3.14 × 6 = 37.68 cm, so the angle is 15.7 ÷ 37.68 × 360 = 150°. Treating the 6 cm as a diameter instead of a radius gives a circumference of 18.84 cm and an angle of 300°. Using π = 3 instead of the given 3.14 gives a circumference of 36 cm and an angle of 157°. Treating the fraction 15.7 ÷ 37.68 as being out of 100 rather than 360 gives about 42°.
- (a) 753 — The estimate from 2000 spins is the most reliable, since it comes from the largest sample size, so the best estimate of the probability is 0.251. Over a further 3000 spins, the expected number landing on green is 3000 × 0.251 = 753. Writing 1050 is wrong because 3000 × 0.350 = 1050 uses the estimate from only 20 spins, the LEAST reliable of the three. Writing 870 is wrong because 3000 × 0.290 = 870 uses the estimate from 200 spins rather than the more reliable 2000-spin estimate. Writing 750 is wrong because 3000 × 0.25 = 750 ignores the recorded data completely and simply assumes each of the 4 colours is equally likely. The best estimate is 753 expected green spins.
- (c) 33 — Method: multiply the mean by the number of tests to get the total marks, then subtract the marks that are already known. Working: four tests with a mean of 29 give a total of 29 × 4 = 116 marks; the first three marks total 31 + 26 + 26 = 83; so the fourth mark is 116 − 83 = 33. Answer: 33, and checking, (31 + 26 + 26 + 33) ÷ 4 = 116 ÷ 4 = 29. The distractors: 116 comes from stopping at the total for all four tests; 29 comes from assuming the missing mark must be the mean itself; 4 comes from multiplying the mean by 3, the number of marks given, leaving 87 − 83 = 4.
- (a) 1/5 — Work out the bracket first: 2 + 3 = 5. The reciprocal of 5 is 1/5. A candidate who forgot to take the reciprocal and just gave the value of the bracket wrote 5. A candidate who took the reciprocal but made a sign error wrote −1/5. A candidate who found the reciprocal of each number separately and added them, treating reciprocal as if it distributes over addition, worked out 1/2 + 1/3 = 5/6.
- (d) 4 — Subtracting the second equation from the first: the y-terms cancel, and the x-terms combine as 3x − x = 2x; the right-hand sides give 14 − 6 = 8. This gives 2x = 8, so x = 4. A candidate who subtracts in the wrong order would get 2x = 6 − 14 = −8, so x = −4. A candidate who uses only the first equation, dividing 14 by 3 as if y were 0, would get x ≈ 4.67. A candidate who reports the value of y instead of x would get y = 6 − 4 = 2.
- (b) 3/10 — Work out the empty space: 500 − 350 = 150 litres. Form the fraction 150/500; both numbers share a factor of 50, so 150 ÷ 50 = 3 and 500 ÷ 50 = 10, giving 3/10. 7/10 comes from writing the fraction of the tank that is full (350/500), instead of the empty space. 1/2 comes from miscalculating 500 − 350 as 250 instead of 150. 3/7 comes from comparing the empty space with the water held (150/350), instead of with the tank's total capacity.
- (a) 89.6° — Angle PQR is at vertex Q, so the side opposite it is PR = 13 cm. Using the cosine rule rearranged for an angle: cos(PQR) = (121 + 49 − 169) ÷ (2 × 11 × 7) = 1 ÷ 154 = 0.0065. Taking the inverse cosine, angle PQR = 89.6° (1 d.p.). Using PR as one of the enclosing sides instead of as the opposite side, finding angle P instead of angle Q, gives (121 + 169 − 49) ÷ (2 × 11 × 13) = 241 ÷ 286 = 0.8427, and angle = 32.6°. Swapping the sign inside the bracket, computing 169 − 121 − 49 instead, gives −1 ÷ 154 = −0.0065, and angle = 90.4°. Using PR in the denominator instead of QR gives (121 + 49 − 169) ÷ (2 × 11 × 13) = 1 ÷ 286 = 0.0035, and angle = 89.8°. Keep PR as the opposite side, QR and PQ as the enclosing sides, and angle PQR comes to 89.6°.
- (a) 3,860 — The probability a bulb works correctly is the complement of being defective: 1 − 0.035 = 0.965. Expected number working correctly = 0.965 × 4,000 = 3,860. Using the probability of being defective instead of its complement gives 4,000 × 0.035 = 140, the expected number of DEFECTIVE bulbs, not working ones. Shifting the decimal point in the complement, using 0.0965 instead of 0.965, gives 4,000 × 0.0965 = 386. Assuming every bulb works, ignoring the 0.035 probability altogether, gives the full batch of 4,000.
- (b) 0.3, 32%, 7/20 — Method: convert every number to a decimal so they can be compared on the same scale. Working: 7/20 = 0.35, 0.3 stays as 0.3, and 32% = 0.32. Comparing 0.3, 0.32 and 0.35 in size gives the order 0.3, then 0.32, then 0.35. Answer: 0.3, 32%, 7/20. 7/20, 32%, 0.3 lists the numbers from largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest. 0.3, 7/20, 32% swaps 32% and 7/20, treating the fraction 7/20 as smaller even though 7/20 = 0.35 is bigger than 32% = 0.32. 32%, 0.3, 7/20 comes from moving the digits one place too far when converting the percentage, giving 0.032 instead of 0.32, which makes 32% look far smaller than it really is.
- (a) −1/3 — The gradient of L is 3, the coefficient of x in y = mx + c form. The gradient of a line perpendicular to a line of gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1/m. So the perpendicular gradient is −1/3. Distractor routes: 3 gives the gradient of L itself, forgetting to change it at all — that is the gradient of a PARALLEL line. 1/3 takes the reciprocal of 3 but keeps the same sign, missing the negative sign a perpendicular gradient requires. −3 negates the gradient of L but does not take its reciprocal, giving the gradient of a line with the opposite slope rather than a perpendicular one.
- (c) 21% — Method: an increase of 10% is a multiplier of 1.1, and two successive increases are found by multiplying the multipliers. Working: 1.1 × 1.1 = 1.21, so the rent is 121% of the original, which is an increase of 21%. Answer: 21%. The distractors: 20% comes from adding the two percentages, which ignores that the second 10% is taken of a larger amount; 121% is the multiplier written as the change rather than the change itself; 11% comes from slipping in the multiplication and getting 1.11 instead of 1.21.
- (c) 5 — The front elevation shows one square for every cube visible from the front, column by column: the left-hand column is 2 cubes high, so it contributes 2 squares; the middle column is 2 cubes high, so it contributes 2 more; the right-hand column is 1 cube high, so it contributes 1. The total is 2 + 2 + 1 = 5 squares. "6" comes from drawing a full 3 by 2 rectangle, treating every column as if it reached the greatest height. "4" comes from losing a square from one of the two tall columns, counting 2 + 1 + 1. "3" comes from counting one square per column — the width of the solid — and ignoring the heights altogether.
- (d) The roots of x² − 6x + 5 = 0 are x = 1 and x = 5 (since it factorises to (x − 1)(x − 5)), so by symmetry the turning point has x-coordinate 3, not 6. — Factorising, x² − 6x + 5 = (x − 1)(x − 5), so the roots are x = 1 and x = 5. The turning point lies midway between the roots by symmetry: (1 + 5) ÷ 2 = 3. The coefficient of x has no direct role in locating the turning point this way. The option giving −6 makes an arbitrary sign change with no mathematical basis. The option giving 5 wrongly takes just one of the two roots instead of their midpoint.
- (c) 20 cm — Convert 5 km to centimetres: 5 km = 5000 m = 500 000 cm. Divide by the scale factor: 500 000 ÷ 25 000 = 20, giving 20 cm. Converting only as far as metres, 5000 ÷ 25 000 = 0.2, gives 0.2 cm — the conversion to centimetres was never finished. Dropping a zero in the division gives 2 cm, ten times too small. Misreading the scale as 1 : 2500 instead of 1 : 25 000 gives 500 000 ÷ 2500 = 200 cm, ten times too big.
- (b) (0, 2) — Method: to rotate about a point that is not the origin, first subtract the centre's coordinates, apply the rotation rule to the shifted point, then add the centre's coordinates back on; only after that do you apply the translation, in the order the question states them. Working: shifting P relative to the centre gives (6 − 1, 4 − 2) = (5, 2); rotating 90° clockwise sends (x, y) to (y, −x), giving (2, −5); adding the centre back on gives (2 + 1, −5 + 2) = (3, −3); applying the translation (−3, 5) gives (3 − 3, −3 + 5) = (0, 2). Answer: (0, 2). Applying the translation BEFORE the rotation, reversing the order the question gives them in, gives (8, 0); stopping after the rotation and forgetting the translation altogether gives (3, −3); and rotating anticlockwise instead of clockwise, using (x, y) → (−y, x), gives (−4, 12). Always carry out the two transformations in the order stated — rotate about the given centre first, then translate — and check each step before moving to the next.
- (c) x + 2y = 6 — L has gradient 2, so the perpendicular gradient is −1/2. Substituting (4, 1) into y − 1 = −(1/2)(x − 4): y = −(1/2)x + 2 + 1 = −(1/2)x + 3, so 2y = −x + 6, giving x + 2y = 6. Distractor routes: x − 2y = 2 comes from using gradient +1/2 instead of −1/2, forgetting the negative sign the perpendicular rule needs. x + 2y = 9 comes from swapping the point's coordinates, substituting (1, 4) instead of (4, 1). x + 2y = −2 comes from a sign error distributing the negative gradient over the bracket, computing −(1/2)(x − 4) as −(1/2)x − 2 instead of −(1/2)x + 2.
- (a) 0 — the line does not intersect the circle — Substitute y = 2x + 7 into x² + y² = 4: x² + (2x + 7)² = 4, which expands to x² + 4x² + 28x + 49 = 4, giving 5x² + 28x + 45 = 0. The discriminant is b² − 4ac = 28² − 4 × 5 × 45. Since 28² = 784 and 4 × 5 × 45 = 900, the discriminant is 784 − 900 = −116. Since the discriminant is negative, the quadratic has no real solutions, so the line does not meet the circle at all: 0 intersection points. Distractor routes: "1 — the line is a tangent" confuses a negative discriminant with a zero one; a discriminant of exactly zero gives one point, a tangent, but −116 is not zero. "2 — the line crosses the circle at two points" assumes a positive discriminant without actually working it out. "It cannot be found without solving the quadratic" is the whole point the discriminant exists to avoid — its sign alone, without finding x, tells you the number of real solutions.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.