Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 200 g — One quarter of 160 g is 40 g. Increasing the amount means adding this on: 160 + 40 = 200 g. Finding the increase, 1/4 of 160 = 40 g, but stopping there without adding it to the original amount leaves just 40 g. Using 4/5 instead of 5/4 as the scaling fraction, 160 × 4/5 = 128 g, actually decreases the amount rather than increasing it. Increasing by a half instead of a quarter, 160 + 80 = 240 g, uses the wrong fraction of 160.
- (a) x = 6 — Method: a minus sign in front of a bracket changes the sign of every term inside it, so expand the bracket first and then simplify. Working: expanding gives 4x − 2x + 6 = 18, which simplifies to 2x + 6 = 18; subtracting 6 from both sides gives 2x = 12, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 6. Answer: x = 6. The distractors: x = 12 comes from leaving the −6 unchanged when the bracket is removed, giving 4x − 2x − 6 = 18 and so 2x = 24; x = 24 comes from reaching 2x = 12 correctly and then multiplying by 2 instead of dividing by 2; x = 3 comes from dividing by 2 too early, at 2x + 6 = 18, and dividing only the 2x and the 18 while leaving the 6 untouched, which gives x + 6 = 9.
- (d) £82.50 — Find the hourly rate: £52.50 ÷ 7 = £7.50 per hour. For 11 hours: 11 × £7.50 = £82.50. £30 comes from working out the pay for only the extra 4 hours (4 × £7.50), and forgetting to include the original £52.50. £99 comes from misremembering the hourly rate as £9 instead of £7.50, then 11 × £9. £56.50 comes from adding the extra number of hours (4) straight onto the pay in pounds (52.5 + 4), confusing hours with pounds.
- (a) 7 — Rearranging F + V − E = 2 gives F = 2 − V + E = 2 − 10 + 15 = 7. A candidate who works out E − V without the +2, giving 15 − 10, answers 5. A candidate who rearranges with a sign error, working out 2 + V − E = 2 + 10 − 15 = −3 and then drops the negative sign, answers 3. A candidate who adds all three numbers together, V + E + 2 = 10 + 15 + 2, answers 27, having used the wrong operation entirely. The correct number of faces is 7.
- (c) 0.37 — Method: pool the two runs into one combined set of results, then find the relative frequency of red across all of the spins together. Working: total reds = 16 + 21 = 37. Total spins = 40 + 60 = 100. Relative frequency = 37 ÷ 100 = 0.37. Answer: 0.37. Watch out: writing down 0.40 uses only the first run, 16 ÷ 40, and throws away the extra evidence from the second 60 spins. Writing down 0.35 uses only the second run, 21 ÷ 60, and throws away the first run instead. And writing down 0.375 averages the two runs' separate rates, (0.40 + 0.35) ÷ 2, which treats a run of 40 spins and a run of 60 spins as equally weighted, when pooling the actual counts gives the larger run its fair share of influence.
- (c) Yes — with an estimate of 320, above the 250 limit. — Method: scale the sample proportion up to the whole batch to get an estimate, then compare that estimate with the 250 limit to reach a decision. Working: in the sample, 4 out of 50 boards are faulty, a proportion of 4 ÷ 50 = 0.08. Applying that proportion to the batch of 4,000 gives an estimate of 0.08 × 4000 = 320 faulty boards. Since 320 is more than 250, the factory should scrap the batch. Inverting the proportion, 50 ÷ 4 = 12.5, and treating that as a percentage of the batch, 12.5% × 4000 = 500, still gives 'yes' but from the wrong fraction, so it overstates the estimate. Comparing the raw number of faulty boards found in the sample, 4, directly with the 250 limit skips the scaling up to the batch altogether, and 4 is nowhere near 250, so that route wrongly says 'no'. Dividing the batch by the sample size, 4000 ÷ 50 = 80, finds how many samples of 50 fit into the batch but stops before multiplying by the 4 faulty boards found, so it also wrongly says 'no'. Always find the proportion in the sample first, scale it up to the whole batch, and only then compare the estimate with the limit given.
- (c) 6.3 × 10⁷ — To add numbers in standard form, first write them with the same power of 10. 6 × 10⁷ = 60 × 10⁶, so the sum is 60 × 10⁶ + 3 × 10⁶ = 63 × 10⁶ = 6.3 × 10⁷. A candidate who added the A values without adjusting for the different powers worked out 6 + 3 = 9 and kept the larger power, writing 9 × 10⁷. A candidate who added the powers of 10 as if multiplying wrote 9 × 10¹³. A candidate who added the A values but used the smaller power wrote 9 × 10⁶.
- (a) −2 m/s² — The gradient of a line through two points is the change in the y-value divided by the change in the x-value: (6 − 22)/(16 − 8) = −16/8 = −2 m/s². The negative sign confirms the deceleration mentioned in the question. Writing 2 m/s² comes from subtracting the velocities in the wrong order, using (22 − 6) instead of (6 − 22), which loses the sign that shows the car is slowing down. Writing −0.5 m/s² comes from inverting the fraction, dividing the change in time by the change in velocity instead of the other way round. Writing −16 m/s² comes from finding the change in velocity, −16, but forgetting to divide by the change in time, 8 seconds.
- (c) 135 g — Find the ratio of butter to sugar in the first batch: 240:160, which simplifies to 3:2. For the second batch, sugar = 90 g, so butter = 90 × 3/2 = 135 g. (60 g comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 90 × 2/3. 170 g comes from subtracting the drop in sugar, 160 − 90 = 70 g, from the original butter amount, 240 − 70, instead of scaling. 240 g comes from not scaling the butter amount at all.)
- (d) £817 — Method: find the area of the plot with 1/2 × a × b × sin C, then multiply the area by the cost of a square metre. Working: the 108° angle is between AB and AC, so the area is 1/2 × 23.5 × 17.2 × sin 108° = 202.1 × 0.95106 = 192.21 m². The cost is 192.21 × 4.25 = 816.89. Answer: the turf costs £817 to the nearest pound. The distractors: £1634 comes from leaving out the factor 1/2, so the area is taken as 384.42 m²; £859 comes from leaving the sine out and using 202.1 m² as the area, which treats the two sides as a base and a perpendicular height; £192 is the area of the plot written down as though it were the cost, stopping one step short of the question.
- (a) 753 — The estimate from 2000 spins is the most reliable, since it comes from the largest sample size, so the best estimate of the probability is 0.251. Over a further 3000 spins, the expected number landing on green is 3000 × 0.251 = 753. Writing 1050 is wrong because 3000 × 0.350 = 1050 uses the estimate from only 20 spins, the LEAST reliable of the three. Writing 870 is wrong because 3000 × 0.290 = 870 uses the estimate from 200 spins rather than the more reliable 2000-spin estimate. Writing 750 is wrong because 3000 × 0.25 = 750 ignores the recorded data completely and simply assumes each of the 4 colours is equally likely. The best estimate is 753 expected green spins.
- (c) Sam is correct — The leading zeros in 0.070268 are not significant, so the first three significant figures are 7, 0 and 2. The next digit along is 6, and since 6 is 5 or more, the third significant figure rounds up from 2 to 3, giving 0.0703. This means Sam's answer is correct. Writing 0.070 keeps only 2 significant figures, one short of what was asked. Writing 0.0702 ignores the digit 6 that follows and leaves the third figure unrounded. Writing 0.0704 rounds the third figure up twice, as if a later digit had also pushed it up.
- (d) x = 5y + 4 — To make x the subject of y = (x − 4)/5, first multiply both sides by 5 to clear the fraction: 5y = x − 4, then add 4 to both sides: x = 5y + 4. Writing x = 5y − 4 multiplies correctly but keeps the minus sign on the 4 instead of changing it to a plus when moving it across. Writing x = y/5 + 4 divides by 5 instead of multiplying, the wrong inverse of the fraction. Writing x = 5(y + 4) adds 4 before multiplying by 5, reversing the correct order of the two steps. The correct rearrangement is x = 5y + 4.
- (c) £7617.60 — To decrease by 8% each year, multiply by 0.92 (100% − 8%) twice. £9000 × 0.92 × 0.92 = £7617.60. £7560.00 comes from treating the two 8% decreases as a single flat 16% decrease applied once instead of compounding: £9000 × 0.84 = £7560.00. £8280.00 comes from applying the 8% decrease only once, for 1 year instead of 2: £9000 × 0.92 = £8280.00. £10497.60 comes from multiplying by 1.08 twice, increasing the value instead of decreasing it: £9000 × 1.08 × 1.08 = £10497.60.
- (d) 13 — Method: OP and PQ meet at a right angle because of the tangent–radius fact, so triangle OPQ is right-angled at P; use Pythagoras' theorem. Working: OQ² = OP² + PQ² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169; OQ = √169 = 13. A student who answers 17 has simply added the two given lengths (5 + 12) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 7 has subtracted the two given lengths (12 − 5) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 144 has correctly squared 12 but stopped there, forgetting to add 5² and take the square root. Answer: 13 cm.
- (b) 2x + 3 — fg(x) means f(g(x)): apply g first, then apply f to the result. g(x) = 2x, so f(g(x)) = f(2x) = 2x + 3. Writing 2x + 6 comes from working out gf(x) instead — g(f(x)) = g(x + 3) = 2(x + 3) = 2x + 6 — which applies the functions in the wrong order. Writing 3x + 3 comes from adding f(x) and g(x) together, (x + 3) + 2x = 3x + 3, instead of composing them. Writing 2x² + 6x comes from multiplying f(x) and g(x) together, (x + 3)(2x) = 2x² + 6x, instead of substituting one into the other.
- (d) 1:4 — Convert 1.4 l to millilitres: 1.4 l = 1400 ml. The ratio is 350 : 1400. Divide both parts by 350: 350 ÷ 350 = 1 and 1400 ÷ 350 = 4, giving 1 : 4. Misreading 1.4 l as 14 (moving the decimal point) gives 350 : 14, which simplifies to 25 : 1 — a very different, implausible ratio. Dividing by 175 instead of 350 gives 2 : 8, which still shares a common factor of 2, so it is not fully simplified. Swapping the order gives 4 : 1, litres to millilitres the wrong way round.
- (a) 250° — The back bearing (the bearing of A from B) differs from the bearing of B from A by exactly 180°. Because the given bearing, 070°, is less than 180°, add 180°: 070 + 180 = 250°, so the bearing of A from B is 250°. Choosing 180° assumes the back bearing is always exactly 180°, ignoring the original bearing altogether. Choosing 110° comes from subtracting 180° from 070° and dropping the negative sign (070 − 180 = −110) instead of adding 180°. Choosing 160° comes from adding only 90° instead of 180° (070 + 90 = 160).
- (d) 4 — Subtracting the second equation from the first: the y-terms cancel, and the x-terms combine as 3x − x = 2x; the right-hand sides give 14 − 6 = 8. This gives 2x = 8, so x = 4. A candidate who subtracts in the wrong order would get 2x = 6 − 14 = −8, so x = −4. A candidate who uses only the first equation, dividing 14 by 3 as if y were 0, would get x ≈ 4.67. A candidate who reports the value of y instead of x would get y = 6 − 4 = 2.
- (b) The total volume of water, in litres, that has flowed in. — On a rate-time graph, the y-axis is in litres per minute and the x-axis is in minutes; multiplying a rate by a time gives litres per minute × minutes = litres, a total volume. So the area under the graph represents the total volume of water that has flowed in. Thinking the area itself represents the rate, rather than what the rate accumulates to, gives the wrong claim about the average rate of flow. Confusing the area with the gradient of the graph — which measures how the rate is changing — gives the wrong claim about litres per minute squared. Ignoring the flow-rate axis and focusing only on the time axis gives the wrong claim that the area is simply the total time.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.