Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 1/4 — A negative index means the reciprocal of the positive power, so 2⁻² = 1 ÷ 2² = 1/4. Treating the negative sign as making the answer negative instead gives −(2²) = −4. Ignoring the negative sign altogether gives just 2² = 4. Finding the reciprocal correctly but then also applying a negative sign gives −1/4.
- (b) x = 2, y = −5 — 2x² − 8x + 3 rewrites as 2(x² − 4x) + 3, then as 2[(x − 2)² − 4] + 3, which simplifies to 2(x − 2)² − 5, since −2 × 4 + 3 = −5. Substituting x = 2: 2 × 2² = 8, 8 × 2 = 16, so 8 − 16 + 3 = −5, confirming the minimum value −5 at x = 2: turning point x = 2, y = −5. Halving b instead of halving b/a — using 4 as the shift instead of 2 — lands on turning point x = 4, y = −29, which is wrong because when a ≠ 1 the shift inside the bracket is b/(2a), not b/a alone. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives x = −2, y = −5 — wrong, because (x − 2)² is zero at x = 2, not x = −2. Computing 8 − 3 = 5 instead of 3 − 8 = −5 flips the sign of the constant, giving x = 2, y = 5 — wrong, since the completed square's constant must be evaluated as 3 minus 8, not 8 minus 3. Whenever a ≠ 1, factor a out of the x² and x terms first, and always check a turning point by substituting back into the original equation.
- (b) 3/10 — Work out the empty space: 500 − 350 = 150 litres. Form the fraction 150/500; both numbers share a factor of 50, so 150 ÷ 50 = 3 and 500 ÷ 50 = 10, giving 3/10. 7/10 comes from writing the fraction of the tank that is full (350/500), instead of the empty space. 1/2 comes from miscalculating 500 − 350 as 250 instead of 150. 3/7 comes from comparing the empty space with the water held (150/350), instead of with the tank's total capacity.
- (c) 6 squares — Method: the plan view shows the footprint of the solid; a second layer stacked on top of floor positions that are already covered does not create any new squares in the plan. Working: the row of 4 cubes and the row of 2 cubes attached at the end do not overlap, so the footprint has 4 + 2 = 6 distinct squares. Answer: 6 squares. The distractors: 12 squares comes from counting the total number of cubes used, including the second layer (6 floor positions × 2 layers = 12), instead of the footprint. 4 squares comes from counting only the row of four and forgetting the attached row of two. 5 squares comes from wrongly treating the corner square as shared between the two rows (4 + 1 instead of 4 + 2).
- (a) 7/16 — Method: the adult picked is known to have a driving licence, so the sample space is everyone with a licence; divide the number of men with a licence by that total. Working: 45 women and 35 men have a licence, so 80 adults have one. The men with a licence give 35/80, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 5 gives 7/16. Answer: the probability is 7/16. The distractors: 7/10 is 35/50, the probability that an adult has a licence given that he is a man, which is the condition and the event the wrong way round; 7/24 is 35/120, dividing by all 120 adults surveyed instead of by the 80 who have a licence; 5/12 is 50/120, the probability that an adult picked from the whole survey is a man, which uses none of the licence information the question supplies.
- (c) No, 90 cm is far outside the heights on the graph — Method: a line of best fit describes the trend only across the stretch of data it was drawn through; predicting beyond that stretch is extrapolation, and nothing in the data supports it. Working: the heights used to draw this line run from 150 cm to 180 cm, all of them Year 10 pupils, while 90 cm is 60 cm below the shortest of them and belongs to a two-year-old child, whose build follows no trend the graph has measured. Substituting anyway gives 0.9 × 90 − 85 = −4, a mass of −4 kg, which cannot exist. Answer: no, because 90 cm is far outside the heights on the graph. The distractors: saying a line of best fit cannot be used to predict at all throws away its main purpose, since a prediction made between the plotted values is perfectly sound; saying the line passes through all 20 points misdescribes a line of best fit, which is drawn to follow the trend of the points and will normally pass through few of them; saying the equation works for any value put into it treats an equation fitted to Year 10 heights as a law of nature, and the mass of −4 kg shows what that assumption produces.
- (a) 0.5, 0.55, 0.56, 0.6, 0.601 — Compare the decimals by giving them all the same number of decimal places first: 0.600, 0.550, 0.601, 0.500, 0.560. Ordering these from smallest to largest gives 0.500, 0.550, 0.560, 0.600, 0.601, which is 0.5, 0.55, 0.56, 0.6, 0.601. Comparing the digits as though they were whole numbers, reading 0.601 as "601" and 0.5 as "5", without padding to the same number of decimal places, gives the wrong order 0.5, 0.6, 0.55, 0.56, 0.601, because it ignores the place value of each digit. Ordering largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest, as the question asks, gives 0.601, 0.6, 0.56, 0.55, 0.5. Misreading the close values 0.55 and 0.56 and swapping them gives 0.5, 0.56, 0.55, 0.6, 0.601. So the correct order, smallest to largest, is 0.5, 0.55, 0.56, 0.6, 0.601.
- (d) 12 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 18 + 4(n − 1), set it equal to 62, and solve for n. Working: 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, so 4(n − 1) = 44, giving n − 1 = 11, so n = 12. Answer: row 12. 11 comes from using 18 + 4n = 62 instead of 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, an off-by-one error, giving n = 11. 48 comes from correctly simplifying to 4n = 48 but stopping there, without dividing by 4 to find n. 15.5 comes from dividing 62 by 4 directly, ignoring the 18 seats already in the front row.
- (a) 1.3 — The gradient of a distance-time graph gives the speed. Difference in speed = 4.5 − 3.2 = 1.3 km/h. A student who subtracts the speeds the wrong way round, 3.2 − 4.5, gets −1.3. A student who adds the two speeds instead of comparing them gets 7.7. A student who multiplies the two gradients gets 14.4.
- (d) 59.4° and 120.6° — Method: two sides and an angle that is not between them can describe two triangles, because an acute angle and its supplement have the same sine. Use the sine rule for the angle, then test whether the supplement also fits inside 180°. Working: AB = 9 cm faces angle ACB and BC = 6 cm faces the 35° angle, so sin ACB = 9 × sin 35° ÷ 6 = 5.1622 ÷ 6 = 0.86036. The inverse sine of 0.86036 is 59.358°, and its supplement is 180° − 59.358° = 120.642°. Both survive the angle-sum test, since 35° + 59.4° = 94.4° and 35° + 120.6° = 155.6°, each less than 180°. Answer: angle ACB is 59.4° or 120.6° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 22.5° and 157.5° come from putting the sides the wrong way up, 6 × sin 35° ÷ 9 = 0.38238; 30.6° and 149.4° come from pressing the inverse cosine key on 0.86036 instead of the inverse sine key; 59.4° and 85.6° are the two unknown angles of the first triangle, 59.358° and 180° − 35° − 59.358°, given by a candidate who has found one triangle and reported its angles rather than the two possible sizes of the same angle.
- (d) 3/10 — Method: list the full possibility space as pairs of coin and spinner results, then count how many pairs satisfy both conditions and divide by the size of the whole space. Working: the coin gives 2 outcomes and the spinner gives 5, so the full space has 2 × 5 = 10 equally likely pairs. The pairs with a tail and an odd number are (T,1), (T,3) and (T,5), which is 3 out of 10. Answer: 3/10. Watch out: writing down 1/2 uses only the coin's own chance of a tail and ignores that the spinner also has to land on an odd number. Writing down 3/5 uses only the spinner's chance of landing on an odd number and ignores the coin altogether. And writing down 1/10 counts just one matching outcome, such as (T,1), instead of all three pairs that satisfy both conditions.
- (d) 1/4 — Method: deal with the fractional index first, then the negative sign. Working: $8^{2/3} = (\sqrt[3]{8})^2 = 2^2 = 4$. A negative index means take the reciprocal of that result, so $8^{-2/3} = \frac{1}{8^{2/3}} = \frac{1}{4}$. Answer: 1/4. A candidate who evaluates $8^{2/3}$ correctly but forgets the negative sign entirely gets 4 — they have dropped the instruction to take a reciprocal. A candidate who takes the reciprocal step but applies it as a sign change to the finished number instead of inverting it gets −4. A candidate who multiplies 8 by −2/3, treating the index as an ordinary factor rather than a power, gets −16/3.
- (c) 10 m/s — A symmetric chord gradient uses the two points either side of t = 3: (2, 40) and (4, 60). The gradient is the change in height divided by the change in time: (60 − 40) ÷ (4 − 2) = 20 ÷ 2 = 10 m/s. Using only the values either side of one gap, (2, 40) and (3, 54), instead of the full symmetric chord, gives (54 − 40) ÷ (3 − 2) = 14 m/s. Getting the correct number but dropping the time unit, leaving only metres, gives 10 m. Dividing time by height instead of height by time inverts the calculation to (4 − 2) ÷ (60 − 40) = 0.1 s/m.
- (d) 60 km/h — Method: use the formula v = d ÷ t with the distance and time given. Working: 180 ÷ 3 = 60 km/h. So the average speed is 60 km/h. Distractor 540 km/h comes from multiplying the distance and time instead of dividing. Distractor 90 km/h comes from dividing by 2 instead of 3. Distractor 18 km/h comes from dividing by 10 instead of 3, a decimal-point slip.
- (d) y = 2 — Two reflections in perpendicular lines that cross at a point combine to a 180° rotation about that point. The line x = 3 is vertical, so the second line must be horizontal, and it must pass through the centre of rotation (3, 2) — that line is y = 2. Taking the y-coordinate of the centre but writing it against the wrong letter gives y = 3. Assuming the second line must also be vertical, like the first one, and just swapping in the other coordinate gives x = 2. Reaching for the standard mirror line y = x without checking that it actually passes through (3, 2) gives y = x — it does not pass through that point at all. The line that is both perpendicular to x = 3 and through (3, 2) is y = 2.
- (c) 1, 7, 13, 19 — Method: substitute n = 1, 2, 3, 4 into the rule 6n − 5 in turn. Working: n = 1: 6 − 5 = 1. n = 2: 12 − 5 = 7. n = 3: 18 − 5 = 13. n = 4: 24 − 5 = 19. Answer: 1, 7, 13, 19. 6, 12, 18, 24 comes from using 6n on its own, forgetting to subtract 5. 5, 11, 17, 23 comes from using the rule 6n − 1 instead of 6n − 5, a slip in the constant. 0, 6, 12, 18 comes from using 6(n − 1) instead of 6n − 5, effectively shifting every term one position along.
- (c) The tangent is horizontal, so its gradient is 0. — Method: at any point where a distance–time graph is momentarily neither increasing nor decreasing, the tangent to the graph at that point is horizontal, and the gradient of a horizontal line is 0 — this is the instantaneous rate of change at that instant. Working: since the hiker's distance is neither increasing nor decreasing at t = 45 minutes, the tangent there is horizontal, so its gradient is 0. Claiming the tangent is vertical, with an undefined gradient, is the opposite of what the stem says: a vertical tangent would mean the distance was changing infinitely fast at that instant, not that it had stopped changing, and on a distance–time graph it cannot happen at all. Reading the gradient as 45, the time value given in the stem, mistakes a value used to LOCATE the point for the rate of change AT that point. Claiming the gradient cannot be found without also knowing the distance at t = 45 minutes overlooks that 'momentarily stationary' already tells you the rate of change directly, without needing to read any distance value at all. Whenever a stem tells you a quantity is momentarily not changing, that is telling you the instantaneous rate of change directly — it is 0, and no further data is needed to find it.
- (b) P, since OP = 5 and OQ = 6 — Using the distance formula, OP = √(3² + 4²) = √(9 + 16) = √25 = 5, and OQ = √(6² + 0²) = √36 = 6. Since 5 is less than 6, P is closer to the origin. Naming Q as closer, with OQ = 5 and OP = 6, has the two distances swapped around the wrong point. Naming P as closer but with OP = 6 and OQ = 5 also has the two values swapped, even though it names the right point. The distances are not equal, since 5 is not the same as 6, so P and Q are not equally distant from the origin.
- (d) −2 — Method: substitute the value into both terms, working out the index and the multiplication before the addition. Working: m² = (−2) × (−2) = 4 and 3m = 3 × (−2) = −6, so the expression becomes 4 + (−6), which is −2. Answer: −2. The distractors: −10 comes from squaring −2 as −4, giving −4 + (−6); 10 comes from working out 3m as +6 and losing the minus sign, giving 4 + 6; −14 comes from working from left to right instead of multiplying first, giving (4 + 3) × (−2).
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.