Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 3/10 — Total parts = 7 + 3 = 10. Gold beads are 3 of those 10 parts, so the fraction is 3/10. 7/10 comes from finding the fraction of red beads instead of gold beads. 7/3 comes from writing the ratio itself as a fraction, without adding the parts to find the total. 3/7 comes from comparing gold beads with red beads instead of with the total number of beads.
- (d) 7 — Method: set up the equation 2.50 + 1.80m = 15.10, then subtract the booking fee and divide by the cost per mile. Working: 1.80m = 15.10 − 2.50 = 12.60; m = 12.60 ÷ 1.80 = 7. Answer: 7 miles. 8.39 comes from dividing the whole £15.10 by £1.80 without first subtracting the booking fee: 15.10 ÷ 1.80 ≈ 8.39. 5.32 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £1.80 and dividing by £2.50: (15.10 − 1.80) ÷ 2.50 ≈ 5.32. 9.78 comes from adding the booking fee instead of subtracting it: (15.10 + 2.50) ÷ 1.80 ≈ 9.78.
- (a) Inverse proportion — A curve that decreases and never touches either axis is the standard shape for inverse proportion, y = k/x. Direct proportion graphs are straight lines through the origin, which this is not, so it must be inverse proportion rather than neither.
- (b) No — the angle given is not the included angle — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides, since SAS requires the included angle. Working: sides AB and BC meet at vertex B, so the angle between them is angle B — but the angle given is angle A, which is not between the two given sides, and the same mismatch happens in triangle DEF. Options: 'two sides and one angle match' restates SAS's ingredients without checking their positions, which is exactly Meera's mistake; 'SSS needs three equal sides' is a true fact about a different condition, but it is not the reason Meera is wrong here; 'SAS allows any equal angle' states a rule that is not how SAS works, since the angle must be the included one. Answer: no, the angle given is not the included angle.
- (c) 24 — Silver, bronze and copper cover every counter, so their probabilities sum to 1: P(copper) = 1 − 1/2 − 1/8 = 3/8. Number of copper counters = 3/8 × 64 = 24. Multiplying the silver probability by 64 gives 32, the number of silver counters, not copper. Multiplying the bronze probability by 64 gives 8, the number of bronze counters. Adding the silver and bronze probabilities (1/2 + 1/8 = 5/8) and multiplying by 64 gives 40, the combined number of silver and bronze counters, not the copper count.
- (d) 45 — Method: a cumulative frequency is a running total — it counts everybody in every class up to and including the one that ends at the value given. Working: the classes that lie wholly below 30 minutes are 0 ≤ t < 10, 10 ≤ t < 20 and 20 ≤ t < 30, with frequencies 6, 14 and 25, so the running total is 6 + 14 = 20 and then 20 + 25 = 45. Answer: 45 people took less than 30 minutes. The distractors: 25 comes from quoting the frequency of the class 20 ≤ t < 30 on its own instead of the running total; 65 comes from accumulating one class too many and including 30 ≤ t < 40, which is 45 + 20; 35 comes from accumulating from the top downwards, 15 + 20, which counts the people who took 30 minutes or more rather than fewer.
- (a) 0.5, 0.55, 0.56, 0.6, 0.601 — Compare the decimals by giving them all the same number of decimal places first: 0.600, 0.550, 0.601, 0.500, 0.560. Ordering these from smallest to largest gives 0.500, 0.550, 0.560, 0.600, 0.601, which is 0.5, 0.55, 0.56, 0.6, 0.601. Comparing the digits as though they were whole numbers, reading 0.601 as "601" and 0.5 as "5", without padding to the same number of decimal places, gives the wrong order 0.5, 0.6, 0.55, 0.56, 0.601, because it ignores the place value of each digit. Ordering largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest, as the question asks, gives 0.601, 0.6, 0.56, 0.55, 0.5. Misreading the close values 0.55 and 0.56 and swapping them gives 0.5, 0.56, 0.55, 0.6, 0.601. So the correct order, smallest to largest, is 0.5, 0.55, 0.56, 0.6, 0.601.
- (c) y = 3x + 2 — Method: divide the change in the outputs by the change in the inputs to find the multiplier, then put one pair of values into the rule to find the number added on. Working: the output rises by 11 − 5 = 6 while the input rises by 3 − 1 = 2, so the multiplier is 6 ÷ 2 = 3; with an input of 1, 3 × 1 = 3 and the output is 5, so 2 is added. Answer: y = 3x + 2, checked against the second pair by 3 × 3 + 2 = 11. The distractors: y = 3x − 2 comes from finding the multiplier 3 and then subtracting the 2 instead of adding it; y = 2x + 3 comes from swapping the multiplier and the number added on; y = x + 4 comes from assuming the input is multiplied by 1 and using 5 − 1 = 4 as the number added on.
- (b) They are in inverse proportion, because x × y = 60 for both pairs. — Testing inverse proportion means checking that x × y is the same for every pair: 4 × 15 = 60 and 6 × 10 = 60, so the quantities are in inverse proportion. Saying they are not in inverse proportion because x + y differs uses addition, which is not the correct test. Saying they are not in inverse proportion because y ÷ x differs uses the test for direct proportion, and finding that it differs tells us nothing about inverse proportion. Saying x × y = 40 for both pairs is an arithmetic slip: 4 × 15 = 60, not 40.
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
- (c) 30 — The numbers less than 4 are 1, 2 and 3, so the probability of that event is 3/6, and the expected count in 90 rolls is 90 × 3/6 = 45. The probability of rolling a 6 is 1/6, and the expected count is 90 × 1/6 = 15. The difference between the two expected counts is 45 − 15 = 30. A candidate who answers 45 has given the expected count for 'less than 4' only, forgetting to subtract the other expected count. A candidate who answers 15 has given the expected count for '6' only. A candidate who answers 36 has used a dice with 5 possible numbers instead of 6, giving 90 × 3/5 = 54 and 90 × 1/5 = 18, a difference of 36.
- (a) 0.55, 58%, 3/5 — Converting all three to decimals: 3/5 = 0.6, 0.55 stays as 0.55, and 58% = 0.58. In order from smallest to largest, this is 0.55, then 58%, then 3/5. Writing the numbers in the reverse order, largest to smallest, gives 3/5, 58%, 0.55. Misconverting 3/5 as 0.5 instead of 0.6 makes it appear smaller than both other values, giving the order 3/5, 0.55, 58%. Misconverting 58% as 0.058 instead of 0.58, by moving the decimal point two extra places, makes it appear smallest of the three, giving the order 58%, 0.55, 3/5.
- (b) x = 3, y = 4 — −x² + 6x − 5 = −(x² − 6x) − 5 = −[(x − 3)² − 9] − 5 = −(x − 3)² + 9 − 5 = −(x − 3)² + 4. Because the coefficient of x² is negative, −(x − 3)² is at most zero, so this turning point is a maximum. Substituting x = 3 gives (x − 3)² = 0, so y = 4, confirming the maximum value 4 at x = 3: turning point (3, 4). Using 6 instead of half of 6 inside the bracket — forgetting to halve before completing the square — lands on turning point (6, 31), wrong, because only half the coefficient belongs inside the bracket. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives (−3, 4) — wrong, because (x − 3)² is zero at x = 3, not x = −3. Computing 5 − 9 = −4 instead of 9 − 5 = 4 flips the sign of the constant, giving (3, −4) — wrong, since the constant must be evaluated as 9 minus 5, not 5 minus 9. Whenever the leading coefficient is negative, the turning point is a maximum, not a minimum — check by substituting back into the original equation.
- (c) 4 : 5 — Method: a formula of the form y = kx says that for every 1 of x there are k of y, so the ratio y : x is k : 1, which is then written with whole numbers and cancelled. Working: here k = 0.8, so y : x = 0.8 : 1; multiplying both parts by 10 gives 8 : 10, and dividing both parts by their highest common factor 2 gives 4 : 5. Answer: 4 : 5. The distractors: 5 : 4 comes from writing x : y, reversing the order asked for; 8 : 10 has the decimal cleared but the ratio left unsimplified, and the question asks for the simplest form; 8 : 1 comes from multiplying only the left-hand part by 10 and leaving the 1 unchanged, which changes the relationship instead of keeping it.
- (b) 31.4 cm — Circumference = π × diameter, so 3.14 × 10 = 31.4 cm. 15.7 cm comes from using the radius, 5 cm, in place of the diameter: 3.14 × 5 = 15.7, which is only half the circumference. 78.5 cm comes from using the area formula π × radius² instead of the circumference formula: 3.14 × 5² = 3.14 × 25 = 78.5. 62.8 cm comes from keeping the 2 from the radius form of the formula, C = 2 × π × radius, but putting the full diameter into it: 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 62.8.
- (a) 3x = 12 — Adding the two equations: the y-terms, +y and −y, have opposite signs, so they cancel; the x-terms combine to 2x + x = 3x; and the right-hand sides add to 11 + 1 = 12. This gives 3x = 12. A candidate who forgets that the y-terms cancel, and instead adds them as if they had the same sign, would write 3x + 2y = 12. A candidate who subtracts the right-hand sides instead of adding them would get 3x = 10. A candidate who correctly reaches 3x = 12 but then treats 12 itself as the value of x, skipping the final division, would write x = 12.
- (c) 27.1 cm — The model length is 20.6 ÷ 76 = 0.271052... metres. Converting to centimetres by multiplying by 100 gives 27.1052..., which rounds to 27.1 cm. Forgetting to convert metres to centimetres leaves the answer as 0.271052... metres, which rounds to 0.3 cm if the unit is simply relabelled. Multiplying by 1000 instead of 100 when converting metres to centimetres gives 271.052..., which rounds to 271.1 cm. Multiplying by 76 instead of dividing, 20.6 × 76 = 1565.6, uses the scale factor the wrong way round — that would be the real length if the model were 20.6 units long, not the other way round.
- (a) 080° — The back bearing differs from the given bearing by 180°. Because 260° is greater than 180°, subtract 180°: 260 − 180 = 80°, so the bearing of A from B is 080°. Choosing 440° adds 180° instead of subtracting it, even though the result would be more than a full turn (260 + 180 = 440). Choosing 180° assumes the back bearing is always exactly 180°, ignoring the original bearing altogether. Choosing 100° comes from measuring the reflex angle the other way round the circle (360 − 260 = 100) instead of applying the 180° back-bearing rule.
- (c) 32 — Using the rule 3n + 4: the 3rd term is 3 × 3 + 4 = 13, and the 5th term is 3 × 5 + 4 = 19, so their sum is 13 + 19 = 32. Forgetting to add the 4 for the 3rd term, 3 × 3 = 9, and adding the correct 5th term, gives 9 + 19 = 28. Rounding the 19 up to 20 to make the addition easier and then forgetting to take the extra 1 back off, 13 + 20 = 33, gives 33. Using the rule 4n + 3 instead of 3n + 4 gives 4 × 3 + 3 = 15 and 4 × 5 + 3 = 23, summing to 38.
- (b) −3/4 — The tangent to a circle at a point is always perpendicular to the radius drawn to that point. The radius from (0, 0) to (3, 4) has gradient 4/3. The gradient of a line perpendicular to a line with gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1/m, so the tangent's gradient here is −3/4. Using the radius's own gradient, forgetting that the tangent is perpendicular to it, gives 4/3. Negating the radius's gradient without also taking the reciprocal gives −4/3. Taking the reciprocal of the radius's gradient without negating it gives 3/4.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.