Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 2 × 3² × 5 — Method: divide repeatedly by the smallest prime number until only prime factors remain. Working: 90 ÷ 2 = 45, 45 ÷ 3 = 15, 15 ÷ 3 = 5, and 5 is prime, so 90 = 2 × 3 × 3 × 5, written as 2 × 3² × 5. 2 × 3 × 15 stops before the 15 is broken down into 3 × 5, so it is not fully factorised. 3 × 3 × 10 stops before the 10 is broken down into 2 × 5. 2 × 45 stops after only one division. Answer: 2 × 3² × 5.
- (a) 11 — Method: work out each term separately using the rule n² − 3, then subtract. Working: 6th term = 6² − 3 = 36 − 3 = 33. 5th term = 5² − 3 = 25 − 3 = 22. Difference: 33 − 22 = 11. Answer: 11. 8 comes from subtracting the constant −3 once at the end instead of it already being included in both terms, (36 − 25) − 3. 1 comes from working out (6 − 5)² instead of finding 6² and 5² separately and then subtracting. −11 comes from subtracting in the wrong order, the 5th term minus the 6th term instead of the 6th minus the 5th.
- (c) 2 : 5 — The point (4, 10) gives x = 4, y = 10, so x : y = 4 : 10. Dividing both parts by their highest common factor, 2, gives 2 : 5 in simplest form. Inverting the whole ratio gives 5 : 2, which is y : x instead of x : y. Dividing only the x-part by 2 and leaving the y-part as 10 gives 2 : 10, but scaling one part on its own changes the ratio: 2 : 10 is the same as 1 : 5, not 4 : 10. Dividing only the y-part by 2 and leaving the x-part as 4 gives 4 : 5, the same one-sided mistake made on the other part of the ratio.
- (b) 5 — Method: the two points have the same y-coordinate, so the segment joining them runs horizontally and its length is the gap between the two x-coordinates; a length is a distance, so it is never negative. Working: the x-coordinates are 2 and −3, so the gap is 2 − (−3) = 2 + 3 = 5. Both points have y = −4, so there is no vertical part to add on. Answer: 5. The distractors: 1 comes from dropping the minus sign on −3 and working out 3 − 2 instead; 0 comes from subtracting the y-coordinates, which are equal, in place of the x-coordinates; 6 comes from counting the grid lines from −3 across to 2 inclusive, which counts one more than the number of gaps between them.
- (d) 21 — Method: 'yoga only' means yoga but not pilates, so subtract the number who do both from the total who do yoga. Working: 32 − 11 = 21. Answer: 21. Watch out: writing down 32, the total who do yoga, answers 'how many do yoga' rather than 'how many do yoga only' — it still includes the 11 who also do pilates. Adding the overlap instead of subtracting it, 32 + 11 = 43, moves in the wrong direction entirely. And writing down 11 gives the number who do both activities, which is the opposite of yoga only.
- (a) The median, as the one very large wage does not move it — Method: an average describes a population well when it sits close to most of the values, so compare what each average does when one value lies far from the rest. Working: in order the wages are 420, 440, 460, 480 and 1,500, so the median is the third of the five, £460. The mean uses every wage: 420 + 440 + 460 + 480 + 1,500 = 3,300 and 3,300 ÷ 5 = 660, so the mean is £660. Four of the five people earn less than £660, and the nearest of those four wages is £180 below it, so £660 describes nobody at the garage; £460 sits inside the group of four similar wages. Answer: the median, as the one very large wage does not move it, while that same wage drags the mean £200 above the median. The distractors: saying the median is always larger than the mean is an invented rule, and here the median £460 is smaller than the mean £660; saying the mean is the only average that uses all five wages is true as far as it goes, but using a value and being dragged by it are the same thing when that value is £1,500; saying £660 lies between the smallest and largest wage is true of every mean ever calculated, so it proves nothing about whether this one is typical.
- (a) 17 — Method: work out each power separately, then combine them as the question asks. Working: $2^3 = 8$ and $3^2 = 9$, and 8 + 9 = 17. 72 comes from working out 8 × 9 = 72, multiplying the two powers instead of adding them. 12 comes from misreading the powers as repeated multiplication of the base by the index, 2 × 3 + 3 × 2 = 6 + 6 = 12. −1 comes from working out 8 − 9 = −1, subtracting the powers instead of adding them. Answer: 17.
- (a) y = (4/3)x + 25/3 — The radius from (0, 0) to (−4, 3) has gradient 3 ÷ (−4) = −3/4. The tangent is perpendicular to the radius, so its gradient is the negative reciprocal, 4/3. Using y − y₁ = m(x − x₁) with the point (−4, 3): y − 3 = (4/3)(x + 4), so y = (4/3)x + 16/3 + 3 = (4/3)x + 25/3. Using the radius's own gradient, −3/4, instead of taking the perpendicular gradient, gives y − 3 = (−3/4)(x + 4), which simplifies to y = −(3/4)x once the −3 and +3 in the constant cancel out. Taking the reciprocal of the radius's gradient but keeping the wrong sign, using −4/3 instead of 4/3, gives y = −(4/3)x − 7/3. Correctly finding the gradient 4/3 and expanding the bracket, but forgetting to add the y-coordinate 3 at the end, gives y = (4/3)x + 16/3.
- (c) 27.1 cm — The model length is 20.6 ÷ 76 = 0.271052... metres. Converting to centimetres by multiplying by 100 gives 27.1052..., which rounds to 27.1 cm. Forgetting to convert metres to centimetres leaves the answer as 0.271052... metres, which rounds to 0.3 cm if the unit is simply relabelled. Multiplying by 1000 instead of 100 when converting metres to centimetres gives 271.052..., which rounds to 271.1 cm. Multiplying by 76 instead of dividing, 20.6 × 76 = 1565.6, uses the scale factor the wrong way round — that would be the real length if the model were 20.6 units long, not the other way round.
- (c) 100.5 m — The curved part of a semicircular bend is half of a full circle's circumference. The full circumference would be 2 × 3.14 × 32 = 200.96 m, and half of that is 200.96 ÷ 2 = 100.48 m, which rounds to 100.5 m. Choosing 201.0 m uses the FULL circumference, forgetting to halve it for a semicircle. Choosing 50.2 m halves the radius as well as taking a semicircle, using 3.14 × 16 = 50.24 m instead of the correct radius of 32 m. Choosing 64.0 m uses the diameter, 2 × 32 = 64, as if it were the curved length, ignoring π and the semicircle shape entirely.
- (b) 80 — To find the number of attempts needed, divide the target number of successes by the probability of success: 60 ÷ 0.75 = 80. Writing 45 is wrong because 60 × 0.75 = 45 multiplies instead of dividing — that is the number of successes expected from 60 attempts, not the number of attempts needed for 60 successes. Writing 240 is wrong because 60 ÷ 0.25 = 240 uses 0.25, the probability of MISSING, instead of 0.75, the probability of scoring. Writing 90 is wrong because it comes from misremembering 0.75 as 2/3 and dividing by that instead: 60 ÷ (2/3) = 90. She needs to attempt 80 free throws.
- (a) 2√3 — Multiply the top and bottom of the fraction by √3, since √3 × √3 = 3: 6/√3 = (6 × √3)/(√3 × √3) = 6√3/3. Dividing 6 by 3 gives 2, so the fraction simplifies to 2√3. Multiplying only the numerator by √3 and then cancelling the surd in the denominator against it as if they were the same term, without properly squaring the denominator, leads to 6. Dividing 6 by 3 as 3 instead of 2 gives 3√3 — a slip in the final division. Simplifying 6√3/3 by cancelling the whole numerator's 3 with the denominator's 3, including the surd, gives 2, which loses the surd altogether.
- (c) x = 0, y = 3 and x = 3, y = 0 — Substitute y = 3 − x into x² + y² = 9: x² + (3 − x)² = 9. Expanding (3 − x)² = 9 − 6x + x² gives x² + 9 − 6x + x² = 9, which simplifies to 2x² − 6x = 0, or 2x(x − 3) = 0, so x = 0 or x = 3. Using y = 3 − x: x = 0 gives y = 3; x = 3 gives y = 0. Distractor routes: x = 0, y = 3 alone stops after the factor 2x = 0 and never checks the second factor, x − 3 = 0. x = 0, y = 3 and x = −3, y = 6 comes from factorising 2x² − 6x as 2x(x + 3), a sign error that gives a second root of −3 instead of 3. x = 0, y = 3 and x = 6, y = −3 comes from expanding (3 − x)² as 9 − 6x, dropping the x² term, which changes the quadratic to x² − 6x = 0 and its second root to 6.
- (c) They are in direct proportion, because y ÷ x = 2.5 for both pairs. — Testing direct proportion means checking that y ÷ x is the same for every pair: 15 ÷ 6 = 2.5 and 25 ÷ 10 = 2.5, so the quantities are in direct proportion. Saying they are not in proportion because x + y differs uses addition, which is not the correct test for proportion. Saying they are not in proportion because y − x differs also uses the wrong test — subtraction, not division. Saying they are in proportion because x × y is 90 and 250 uses multiplication, which is the test for inverse proportion, and the two products are not even equal to each other, so this option also contradicts itself.
- (d) £50 — Area = 1/2 × (3.5 + 6.5) × 4 = 1/2 × 10 × 4 = 20 m². Cost = 20 × £2.50 = £50. (£100 comes from forgetting to halve the trapezium area, giving 40 m² instead of 20 m²; £65 comes from using only the longer parallel side, 6.5 × 4 = 26 m², instead of the trapezium formula; £35 comes from adding all three given lengths, 3.5 + 6.5 + 4, and treating that total as the area in square metres.)
- (c) y = 3x + 1 — Method: a line of known gradient m has equation y = mx + c, and c is found by substituting the coordinates of a point known to lie on it. Working: the gradient is 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 4 gives 4 = 3 × 1 + c, so c = 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: y = 3x + 1. The distractors: y = 3x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 3 − 4 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = x + 3 comes from swapping the two numbers over, putting the gradient 3 in the constant position and the x-coordinate 1 in front of x; y = 3x + 4 comes from using the y-coordinate 4 as the constant without substituting.
- (d) 3/2 — Work out the number of altos: 40% of 30 = 12. The rest are sopranos, so there are 30 − 12 = 18 sopranos. Form the fraction 18/12; both numbers share a factor of 6, so 18 ÷ 6 = 3 and 12 ÷ 6 = 2, giving 3/2. 2/3 comes from writing the fraction the wrong way round, as altos over sopranos (12/18). 3/5 comes from comparing the sopranos with the whole choir (18/30), instead of with the altos. 7/3 comes from miscalculating 30 − 12 as 28 instead of 18, then forming 28/12.
- (b) AB = DE — RHS needs a right angle, the hypotenuse, and one OTHER side to be equal; the right angles and hypotenuses are already equal, so a matching pair of the remaining sides, AB = DE, completes RHS. Angle A = angle D is an extra ANGLE fact, not the extra SIDE fact that RHS specifically requires. AC being parallel to DF says nothing about either triangle's side lengths, so it cannot complete a congruence condition. Being drawn the same way up is about orientation on the page, not about any measurement, so it proves nothing about congruence.
- (d) 2x/(x − 2) — Factorise x² − 4 as (x − 2)(x + 2) first — it's a difference of two squares. The (x + 2) in the numerator then cancels with the (x + 2) in the factorised denominator, and 6x² ÷ 3x simplifies to 2x, leaving 2x/(x − 2). Writing 2/(x − 2) comes from over-cancelling 6x² ÷ 3x as 2 instead of 2x, dropping the x that should remain. Writing 2x/(x + 2) comes from factorising x² − 4 as (x + 2)² instead of (x − 2)(x + 2), a difference of two squares always has one plus and one minus bracket. Writing 2x²/(x − 2) comes from simplifying 6x² ÷ 3x as 2x² instead of 2x, dividing the coefficients but not reducing the power of x.
- (d) 47 — To reach the 8th term from the 1st term, the difference of 6 is added 7 times (8 − 1 = 7): 5 + 7 × 6 = 47. A candidate who multiplies by the term number itself, rather than one less, would compute 5 + 8 × 6 = 53. A candidate who uses one step too few (6 instead of 7) would reach 5 + 6 × 6 = 41. A candidate who forgets to include the first term at all would compute just 8 × 6 = 48.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.