Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 31 — Method: work out each power separately, remembering that any non-zero base raised to the power 0 is 1 and a base raised to the power 1 is itself, then add the three values. Working: 5⁰ = 1, 5¹ = 5 and 5² = 25, so the total is 1 + 5 + 25 = 31. Answer: 31. The distractors: 30 comes from taking 5⁰ as 0 instead of 1; 35 comes from taking 5⁰ as 5, treating a zero index as leaving the base unchanged; 125 comes from adding the indices first, as though the three terms were being multiplied, and working out 5³.
- (a) x = 2, x = 7; y-intercept cannot be found here — Translating y = f(x) to y = f(x − 3) shifts the graph 3 units to the right, so each root increases by 3: x = −1 becomes x = 2, and x = 4 becomes x = 7. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0, which for this new graph is f(0 − 3) = f(−3) — and f(−3) is not one of the values given, so the new y-intercept cannot be worked out from the information given. Writing 'y-intercept stays at (0, −8)' wrongly assumes a horizontal translation leaves the y-intercept unchanged — it generally does not, since it moves the whole graph sideways, including the point that used to sit on the y-axis. Writing roots at x = −4 and x = 1 comes from translating 3 units to the LEFT instead of to the right — f(x − 3) shifts the graph in the positive x-direction, not the negative direction.
- (b) 5:8 — The mix has 5 parts sand and 3 parts cement, so 5 + 3 = 8 parts in total. Sand to total is 5 : 8, and since the highest common factor of 5 and 8 is 1, this is already in its simplest form. Giving 5 : 3 answers sand to cement, not sand to the total mix. Giving 3 : 8 is cement to total, the wrong part of the mix. Giving 8 : 5 has the total and the sand swapped round.
- (a) 180 cm³ — Method: the volume of a right prism is the area of its cross-section multiplied by its length, and the area of a triangle is half the base multiplied by the perpendicular height. Working: the cross-section has area (6 × 5) ÷ 2 = 15 cm², and 15 × 12 = 180. Answer: 180 cm³. The distractors: 360 cm³ comes from taking the cross-section as 6 × 5 = 30 and never halving it, which measures the rectangle around the triangular face rather than the face itself; 66 cm³ comes from adding the base and the perpendicular height and halving, (6 + 5) ÷ 2 = 5.5, which is the trapezium rule used where the triangle rule is needed, and then multiplying by the 12 cm length; 15 cm³ comes from working out the triangular cross-section correctly and stopping there, so the 12 cm length is never used and an area is handed in as a volume.
- (c) 3/8 — Method: write out every result of the three coins as a string of three letters, H for heads and T for tails, count the results that match the description and divide by how many results the list holds. Working: each coin lands two ways and no coin affects another, so the list holds 2 × 2 × 2 = 8 equally likely results. Exactly two heads means one coin lands on tails and the other two on heads, so the results are HHT, HTH and THH — 3 of the 8. Answer: the probability is 3/8. The distractors: 4/8 comes from reading 'exactly two heads' as 'at least two heads' and counting HHH as well; 2/8 comes from a list made without a system, in which HHT and THH are written down and HTH, the result with the tail between the two heads, is missed; 6/8 comes from counting 3 × 2 = 6 ways of picking which two of the three coins show heads, which counts every pair of coins twice, once in each order.
- (d) 25 — Method: the median is estimated at position n ÷ 2 in the cumulative frequency table, then interpolated across the class it falls in: lower boundary, plus the fraction of the way through the class, times the class width. Working: there are 80 sacks, so the median sits at position 80 ÷ 2 = 40. Before the class 20 ≤ m < 30 the cumulative frequency is 22, and by the end of it, it is 58, so this class holds the 40th sack; its frequency is 58 − 22 = 36 and its width is 30 − 20 = 10. The extra distance needed into the class is 40 − 22 = 18, and 18 ÷ 36 × 10 = 5, so the median is 20 + 5 = 25. Answer: the estimated median mass is 25 kg. Watch which numbers the interpolation uses: reading off just the lower boundary of the median class, 20, ignores how far into that class the 40th sack actually falls; treating n ÷ 2 = 40 itself as the median mass mistakes a position in the list for a mass in kilograms; and using the target position, 40, as the extra distance into the class instead of subtracting the sacks already counted changes the calculation to 20 + 40 ÷ 36 × 10. That comes to 20 + 11.1 = 31.1, overshooting the class because it never subtracts the 22 sacks already counted before it.
- (d) 1.2 × 10⁵ — 4 × 3 = 12, and 3 + 1 = 4, giving 12 × 10⁴ — but 12 is not between 1 and 10, so this must be rewritten as 1.2 × 10⁵. Stopping at 12 × 10⁴ without rewriting it leaves the coefficient out of range. Rewriting 12 as 1.2 but leaving the exponent at 4 instead of increasing it to 5 gives 1.2 × 10⁴, which is ten times too small. Adding the coefficients instead of multiplying them gives 4 + 3 = 7, so 7 × 10⁴.
- (a) n² + 4n + 4 — The whole patio-plus-border square has side length (n + 2), so the total is (n + 2)². Expanding this bracket correctly gives n² + 4n + 4, which matches 9, 16, 25, 36 for n = 1, 2, 3, 4. Expanding (n + 2)² by squaring each term separately, as if (a + b)² = a² + b², gives n² + 4, which is already wrong at n = 1 (it gives 5, not 9). Multiplying out (n + 2)(n + 2) as n² + 2n + 2n but forgetting the final 2 × 2 gives n² + 4n, which is 5 short at every value of n. Counting the patio twice — once as the n² inner square and again inside the (n + 2)² total — gives n² + (n² + 4n + 4) = 2n² + 4n + 4.
- (c) 1 : 3 — n : P = 15 : 45. Dividing both parts by their highest common factor, 15, gives 1 : 3. Inverting the ratio, 3 : 1, swaps profit and number of items. Dividing only the n-part by 15, getting 1, but leaving the P-part as 45 gives 1 : 45 — only one side has been simplified. Dividing only the P-part by 15, getting 3, but leaving the n-part as 15 gives 15 : 3, the opposite partial mistake.
- (a) 110° — The angles in a quadrilateral add up to 360°. So 40° + 100° + W + W = 360°, giving 2W = 360° − 140° = 220°, so W = 110°. A pupil who works out 2W = 220° but forgets to divide by 2, since there are two equal angles W, gives 220°. A pupil who mistakenly uses the angle sum of a triangle, 180°, instead of 360°, gets 180° − 140° = 40°. A pupil who simply adds the two given angles together instead of subtracting from 360° gets 40° + 100° = 140°. The correct answer is 110°.
- (b) £100 — Method: find the expected number of wins, turn that into the expected pay out, then compare it with what the games cost. Working: the expected number of wins is 200 × 0.15 = 30. Each win pays £10, so the expected pay out is 30 × 10 = 300 pounds. Playing 200 times at £2 a go costs 200 × 2 = 400 pounds. The expected loss is 400 − 300 = 100 pounds. Answer: Amir should expect to be about £100 down. The distractors: £300 is the expected winnings on their own, with the cost of playing never taken off; £400 is the total cost of playing, with the winnings never taken off; £700 comes from adding the two totals, 400 + 300 = 700, instead of subtracting one from the other.
- (a) 0.625 — Method: convert the fraction to a decimal so it can be compared properly with 0.6. Working: 5/8 = 0.625, and since 0.625 > 0.6, the larger value is 0.625. Answer: 0.625. 0.6 repeats Sam's incorrect claim, made by comparing single digits rather than full place value. 0.58 comes from converting 5/8 incorrectly, treating it as if it read 5 tenths and 8 hundredths. 0.85 comes from turning the fraction upside down and writing its digits straight after the decimal point, 8 then 5, instead of dividing.
- (b) 3/2 — Rearrange 2x + 3y = 6 into y = mx + c: 3y = −2x + 6, so y = −(2/3)x + 2. The gradient of this line is −2/3. The perpendicular gradient is the negative reciprocal: 3/2. Distractor routes: −1/2 comes from reading the gradient straight off the x-coefficient, 2, without dividing by the y-coefficient, 3, first, then taking its negative reciprocal. −3/2 correctly finds the gradient −2/3 but only takes its reciprocal without also changing the sign, giving −3/2 instead of 3/2. 2/3 comes from negating the gradient −2/3 to 2/3, but forgetting to also take the reciprocal.
- (b) Provider Y — £21.00 against Provider X's £23.00 — Provider X's gradient is (35 − 15) ÷ 100 = 0.2, so cost = 15 + 0.2 × 40 = 15 + 8 = £23.00. Provider Y's gradient is (45 − 5) ÷ 100 = 0.4, so cost = 5 + 0.4 × 40 = 5 + 16 = £21.00. £21.00 is less than £23.00, so Provider Y is cheaper: 'Provider Y — £21.00 against Provider X's £23.00'. Getting both costs right but naming Provider X as cheaper compares the two numbers the wrong way round — £23.00 is more than £21.00, not less. Comparing only the fixed fees, £15.00 and £5.00, ignores the cost of the 40 gigabytes actually used. Reading off the costs at 100 gigabytes, £35.00 and £45.00, directly from the graph answers a different usage from the 40 gigabytes the question asks about.
- (b) 10 — Corresponding angles are equal, so 5x + 4 = 3x + 24. Subtracting 3x from both sides gives 2x + 4 = 24, then subtracting 4 gives 2x = 20, so x = 10. 14 comes from adding the constants, 4 + 24, instead of subtracting them when rearranging. 19 comes from treating the angles as co-interior (summing to 180°): 5x + 4 + 3x + 24 = 180 gives 8x = 152, so x = 19. 20 correctly reaches 2x = 20 but stops without dividing by 2.
- (d) The graph never crosses either axis — Since x ≠ 0, there is no point on the graph where x = 0, so it cannot cross the y-axis; likewise 1/x is never equal to 0 for any x, so it cannot cross the x-axis either — the graph never touches either axis. A candidate who forgets the restriction x ≠ 0 might think the graph behaves like other graphs and passes through the origin, (0, 0). A candidate who correctly rules out the x-axis but forgets that x = 0 is also excluded might say the graph crosses the y-axis but never the x-axis. A candidate who only pictures the branch where x and y are both positive might say the graph has only one branch, in quadrant 1, forgetting the second branch where x and y are both negative.
- (d) 7/3 — Put the kettle's energy over the toaster's energy: 2.1/0.9. Multiply both numbers by 10 to clear the decimals: 21/9. Divide both by their highest common factor, 3: 21÷3 = 7, 9÷3 = 3, giving 7/3. (3/7 comes from writing the energy values the wrong way round. 4/3 comes from finding the difference, 2.1 − 0.9 = 1.2 kWh, and writing it as a fraction of the toaster's energy, 1.2/0.9. 7/10 comes from comparing the kettle's energy to the total energy used by both appliances, 2.1/3.0.)
- (d) 4 — Method: a plane of symmetry must pass through the apex and cut the base along one of the base's own lines of symmetry. Working: a square has 4 lines of symmetry (2 through opposite edge midpoints, 2 through opposite corners), and each of these, combined with the apex, gives one plane of symmetry of the pyramid. A student who answers 2 has only found the planes through the edge midpoints, or only the ones through the corners, and missed the other pair. A student who answers 8 has doubled the correct count, perhaps confusing it with a different solid. A student who answers 1 has only spotted the one obvious front-to-back plane. Answer: 4.
- (c) 2 < x < 3 — Factorise x² − 5x + 6 = (x − 2)(x − 3), giving roots x = 2 and x = 3. Since the coefficient of x² is positive, the graph is a U-shape that dips below the x-axis between its roots. So x² − 5x + 6 < 0 for 2 < x < 3. Distractor routes: x < 2 or x > 3 takes the region OUTSIDE the roots, where the graph is above the x-axis, the opposite of what is wanted. 2 ≤ x ≤ 3 uses ≤ instead of the strict < the question asks for, wrongly including the roots themselves, where the expression equals zero, not less than zero. −3 < x < −2 comes from factorising as (x + 2)(x + 3), reversing the sign of both roots.
- (b) (0, −2) — Method: a translation acts on the two coordinates separately: moving right or left changes the x-coordinate only, moving up or down changes the y-coordinate only, and right and up add while left and down subtract. Working: the point starts at (−4, 7); moving 4 units to the right gives an x-coordinate of −4 + 4 = 0; moving 9 units down gives a y-coordinate of 7 − 9 = −2. Answer: (0, −2). The distractors: (5, 3) comes from pairing each number with the wrong coordinate, adding 9 to −4 and taking 4 from 7; (0, 16) comes from treating 'down' as an addition, giving 7 + 9 = 16 for the second coordinate; (−8, −2) comes from treating 'to the right' as a subtraction, giving −4 − 4 = −8 for the first coordinate.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.