Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 3√5 — Split 45 into a perfect square times a factor: 45 = 9 × 5. Take the square root of each part separately: √45 = √9 × √5 = 3√5, since √9 = 3. Writing the perfect-square factor itself (9) as the coefficient instead of its root would give 9√5 — that trap comes from forgetting the last step, rooting 9. Multiplying 3 and 5 together instead of keeping them as coefficient and radicand gives 15, which throws away the surd entirely. Doubling the correct coefficient by mistake gives 6√5.
- (a) x = (y + 9) / 2 — Method: undo the subtraction of 9 first, then undo the multiplication by 2. Working: y = 2x − 9, so adding 9 to both sides gives y + 9 = 2x, then dividing both sides by 2 gives x = (y + 9) / 2. The value x = (y − 9) / 2 comes from a sign error, keeping the −9 instead of moving it to +9. The value x = 2(y + 9) comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing. The value x = y / 2 + 9 comes from dividing by 2 before adding 9, the wrong order of operations, instead of dividing the whole bracket.
- (b) 5:8 — The mix has 5 parts sand and 3 parts cement, so 5 + 3 = 8 parts in total. Sand to total is 5 : 8, and since the highest common factor of 5 and 8 is 1, this is already in its simplest form. Giving 5 : 3 answers sand to cement, not sand to the total mix. Giving 3 : 8 is cement to total, the wrong part of the mix. Giving 8 : 5 has the total and the sand swapped round.
- (b) 4 — The scale factor is the distance from the centre to the image, divided by the distance from the centre to the object: (5 − 1) ÷ (2 − 1) = 4 ÷ 1 = 4. (2.5 comes from dividing the raw y-coordinates, 5 ÷ 2, without first subtracting the centre's coordinate; 3 comes from subtracting the two distances instead of dividing them; 0.25 comes from dividing the distances the wrong way round.)
- (c) 3/16 — The probability that Priya misses a shot is 1 − 3/4 = 1/4. The two shots are independent, so multiply the probability of scoring the first shot by the probability of missing the second shot: 3/4 × 1/4 = 3/16. Choosing 9/16 comes from using the probability of scoring, 3/4, for both shots instead of switching to the miss probability for the second shot, 3/4 × 3/4 = 9/16, which is the probability that she scores with both shots. Choosing 1/2 comes from subtracting the two probabilities instead of multiplying them, 3/4 − 1/4 = 1/2. Choosing 3/4 comes from giving only the probability that she scores with the first shot, forgetting to combine it with what happens on the second shot.
- (d) Correlation is a link; causation is one causing the other — Method: the two words describe different claims — one is about a pattern in the data, the other is about what produced that pattern. Working: correlation says only that two quantities tend to change together, which is something a scatter graph can display; causation says that a change in one quantity actually brings about the change in the other, which needs evidence a scatter graph cannot supply, because a third quantity may be driving both. Answer: correlation is a link between the quantities, while causation is one quantity causing the change in another. The distractors: the statement giving causation as the link and correlation as the cause simply swaps the two words over; the statement that the words mean the same thing is the classic error of reading a correlation as proof of cause; the statement that a scatter graph shows causation but not correlation reverses what a scatter graph can do, since the pattern it displays is exactly the correlation.
- (b) Yes, because 14.8 cm rounds to 15 cm to the nearest cm — Method: a recorded measurement is not an exact length; it stands for every length that rounds to it, so the two records agree if one rod can produce both. Working: Ben's record of 14.8 cm to the nearest 0.1 cm means the rod is between 14.75 cm and 14.85 cm, and 14.8 is nearer to 15 than to 14, so a rod of that length is recorded as 15 cm to the nearest centimetre. Both records can therefore come from the same rod. Answer: Yes, because 14.8 cm rounds to 15 cm to the nearest cm. The distractors: the claim that 14.8 cm rounds to 15.0 cm to 1 decimal place is false, since 14.8 cm is already written to 1 decimal place and stays 14.8 cm; the claim that it rounds to 14 cm is false, because 14.8 is 0.2 away from 15 and 0.8 away from 14; the claim that the two lengths are not the same treats each record as an exact length, when each is only a rounded record of one rod.
- (d) x = 3 or x = −3 — Method: get x² on its own with a coefficient of 1, then take the square root of both sides and keep both the positive and the negative root. Working: dividing 2x² = 18 by 2 gives x² = 9, and the square root of 9 is 3, so x = 3 or x = −3; both check, because 2 × 9 = 18 either way. Answer: x = 3 or x = −3. The distractors: x = 9 or x = −9 comes from dividing by 2 and then forgetting to take the square root; x = 4 or x = −4 comes from subtracting 2 from 18 instead of dividing by it, giving x² = 16; x = 6 or x = −6 comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing, giving x² = 36.
- (b) 25 m/s — Convert km/h to m/s by multiplying by 1000 (km to m) and dividing by 3600 (hours to seconds): 90 × 1000 ÷ 3600 = 25 m/s. Working out 90 ÷ 60 = 1.5 converts using 60, as if going from hours to minutes rather than to seconds. Working out 90 × 3.6 = 324 multiplies by 3.6 instead of dividing by it, going the wrong way between the units. Working out 90 × 1000 = 90000 converts kilometres to metres but forgets to convert hours to seconds at all. The train's speed is 25 m/s.
- (a) 10.4 cm — The scale factor from the smaller triangle to the larger triangle is 8 ÷ 5 = 1.6, so the larger side is 6.5 × 1.6 = 10.4 cm. The distractor 4.0625 cm comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 6.5 × 5 ÷ 8 = 4.0625. The distractor 9.5 cm comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers (8 − 5 = 3) to the given length, 6.5 + 3 = 9.5. The distractor 13 cm comes from doubling the given length, treating the scale factor as 2 instead of 1.6.
- (b) 26 — Method: n(G ∪ H) = n(G) + n(H) − n(G ∩ H), taking off the overlap once so the pupils who study both subjects are not counted twice. Working: 19 + 15 − 8 = 26. Answer: 26. Watch out: adding 19 and 15 without taking off the overlap gives 34, which counts the 8 pupils who study both subjects twice. Taking the 8 off both totals before adding, 19 − 8 + 15 − 8 = 18, counts only the pupils who study exactly one of the two subjects and leaves out the 8 who study both. And writing down 11, which is 19 − 8, gives the number who study geography only, not the number who study geography or history or both.
- (b) £300 — The increased price is 110% of the original, so the original price = £330 ÷ 1.1 = £300. A candidate who finds 10% of £330 and subtracts it, wrongly treating £330 as the original, gets £330 − £33 = £297. A candidate who adds 10% of £330 again instead of reversing the increase gets £330 + £33 = £363. A candidate who divides by 0.1 instead of 1.1 gets £3,300.
- (a) y = −2x − 1 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both differences taken in the same order, and the constant then comes from substituting either point into y = mx + c. Working: m = (−9 − 3) ÷ (4 − (−2)) = (−12) ÷ 6 = −2, so the line is y = −2x + c; substituting (−2, 3) gives 3 = −2 × (−2) + c = 4 + c, so c = 3 − 4 = −1. Answer: y = −2x − 1. The distractors: y = −2x + 1 comes from rearranging 3 = 4 + c the wrong way round and taking the constant as 4 − 3; y = 2x + 7 comes from losing the minus sign when −12 is divided by 6 and then substituting correctly, 3 = 2 × (−2) + c; y = −(1/2)x + 2 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 6 ÷ (−12).
- (a) 0.62 miles — The gradient of the line is the change in miles divided by the change in kilometres: 31 ÷ 50 = 0.62, so 1 kilometre converts to 0.62 miles. Dividing the wrong way round, 50 ÷ 31 = 1.612..., rounds to 1.61 miles — that finds how many kilometres are in 1 mile, not the reverse. Doubling the gradient, 1.24 miles, comes from using 62 ÷ 50 instead of 31 ÷ 50. Reading off the y-coordinate of the given point without dividing by the x-coordinate gives 31.00 miles, which is the number of miles for 50 kilometres, not for 1 kilometre.
- (d) 8.8 — Method: substitute into the cosine rule BC² = AB² + AC² − 2 × AB × AC × cos(BAC) and solve the resulting quadratic in x, keeping only the positive root. Working: 15² = x² + (x + 2)² − 2x(x + 2) cos 100°, which expands to a quadratic with two roots, x = 8.8 and x = −10.8; since x is a length, x = 8.8. Expanding (x + 2)² as x² + 4 instead of x² + 4x + 4, missing the middle term, gives x = 9.6; using +2x(x + 2) cos 100° instead of −2x(x + 2) cos 100° (a sign error on the cosine term) gives x = 10.6; and reporting the size of the rejected negative root instead of discarding it gives x = 10.8. Always expand a squared bracket fully before collecting terms.
- (a) y = −2x + 3 — Method: find the step in the outputs for each step of 1 in the input — falling outputs mean a negative multiplier — then read off the output when the input is 0, because that is the number added on. Working: the outputs 5, 3, 1, −1 fall by 2 each time x rises by 1, so x is multiplied by −2; the output at x = 0 is 3, so 3 is added. Answer: y = −2x + 3, checked at x = 2 by −2 × 2 + 3 = −1. The distractors: y = 2x + 3 comes from taking the size of the step, 2, as the multiplier and ignoring the fact that the outputs are falling; y = −2x − 3 comes from using the correct multiplier but writing the number added on as −3 instead of the output 3 listed at x = 0; y = −x + 4 comes from taking the multiplier as −1, its size read from the step of 1 in the inputs instead of the step of 2 in the outputs and its sign from the fact that the outputs fall, and then fitting the number added on to the pair x = −1, y = 5.
- (c) 4 m/s — The average rate of change of distance with respect to time over an interval is the change in distance divided by the change in time — the gradient of the chord joining the two endpoints, not the gradient of any tangent inside the interval. From t = 3 to t = 8 the change in time is 8 − 3 = 5 and the change in distance is 32 − 12 = 20, so the average speed is 20 ÷ 5 = 4 m/s. Reporting the change in distance on its own, as 20 m/s, is not a speed: those 20 metres were covered over the whole 5 seconds, not in one second, so the 20 still has to be divided by the 5. The tangent's gradient of 3 m/s is the instantaneous speed at the single moment t = 6, not the average over the whole 5-second interval, so it must not be used here. Adding the change in distance and the change in time instead of dividing gives 20 + 5 = 25, which is not a speed. The average speed of the cyclist over the interval is 4 m/s.
- (c) AB ∥ CD only; EF not confirmed — By convention, lines marked with the same number of arrows are parallel to each other, but lines marked with a different number of arrows belong to a different, unrelated family of parallel lines. AB and CD both have a single arrow, so AB is parallel to CD. EF has a double arrow, showing it is not part of the same family as AB and CD; it may be parallel to some other line marked with a double arrow, but nothing here confirms it is parallel to AB or CD, so 'AB ∥ CD only; EF not confirmed' is correct. 'AB, CD and EF are all parallel' and 'EF is parallel to AB' both wrongly treat every arrow mark as showing the same relationship. 'None of the lines are parallel' wrongly assumes a different arrow count rules out any parallel relationship at all, when it actually just signals a different pairing.
- (d) −2 — y = f(x) − 6 is f(x) shifted down by 6, so every y-value on the graph decreases by 6. At x = 0, f(0) = 4, so the new y-value is 4 − 6 = −2. Adding 6 instead of subtracting gives 10; writing down the shift itself, −6, or leaving the original value 4 unchanged both skip the translation altogether.
- (a) 3.5 km/h — Average speed is total distance ÷ total time. Total distance = 5 + 9 = 14 km. Total time, including the rest, = 1 + 1 + 2 = 4 hours. So average speed = 14 ÷ 4 = 3.5 km/h. Leaving out the 1 hour rest and dividing by only the 3 hours of walking gives 14 ÷ 3 = 4.67 km/h. Averaging the two separate speeds, 5 km/h and 4.5 km/h, instead of using total distance over total time, gives (5 + 4.5) ÷ 2 = 4.75 km/h. Dividing only the second leg's distance by the total time, 9 ÷ 4 = 2.25 km/h, ignores the first leg's distance.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.