Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 9 — List all the factors of 36 in pairs that multiply to give 36: 1 × 36, 2 × 18, 3 × 12, 4 × 9, and 6 × 6. This gives the factors 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 36 — nine factors in total, with 6 counted only once even though it appears in a pair with itself. Forgetting that 36 is itself a factor of 36 and leaving it off the list gives 8. Counting the number of factor pairs, five of them, rather than the number of individual factors gives 5. Treating the repeated pair 6 × 6 as two separate factors, 6 and 6 again, gives 10 instead of 9. So 36 has 9 factors.
- (b) (3, 3) and (−1, −5) — Set the two expressions for y equal: x² − 6 = 2x − 3, which rearranges to x² − 2x − 3 = 0. Factorise: (x − 3)(x + 1) = 0, so x = 3 or x = −1. Substitute into the linear equation, y = 2x − 3: x = 3 gives y = 3; x = −1 gives y = −5. The points are (3, 3) and (−1, −5). Distractor routes: (3, 3) and (1, −1) comes from mis-factorising x² − 2x − 3 as (x − 3)(x − 1), giving a second root of 1 instead of −1. (3, 9) and (−1, 1) comes from finding the y-coordinate from y = x² instead of substituting back into the given line equation y = 2x − 3. (3, 3) alone stops after finding only the first root of the quadratic.
- (d) 2:3:5 — The highest common factor of 12, 18 and 30 is 6. Divide every part by 6: 12 ÷ 6 = 2, 18 ÷ 6 = 3, 30 ÷ 6 = 5, giving 2 : 3 : 5. Dividing by 2 instead of 6 gives 6 : 9 : 15, which still shares a common factor of 3, so it is not fully simplified. Dividing by 3 instead of 6 gives 4 : 6 : 10, which still shares a common factor of 2, so it is not fully simplified either. Swapping the first two parts gives 3 : 2 : 5, the parts in the wrong order.
- (b) 60 units² — Method: the area of a triangle is half the base times the perpendicular height, so choose a side to act as the base and measure the perpendicular distance from the opposite vertex to it. Working: A(0, 0) and B(10, 0) both lie on the x-axis, so AB is horizontal and AB = 10 − 0 = 10. The perpendicular height is the distance of C from the x-axis, which is its y-coordinate, 12. Area = (10 × 12) ÷ 2 = 120 ÷ 2 = 60. Answer: 60 units². The distractors: 120 units² comes from multiplying base by height and forgetting to halve; 65 units² comes from using the slanting side AC, which is 13 long, as the height in place of the perpendicular distance 12; 30 units² comes from halving the base to 5 before multiplying and then halving the product as well, so the halving is done twice.
- (b) £100 — Method: find the expected number of wins, turn that into the expected pay out, then compare it with what the games cost. Working: the expected number of wins is 200 × 0.15 = 30. Each win pays £10, so the expected pay out is 30 × 10 = 300 pounds. Playing 200 times at £2 a go costs 200 × 2 = 400 pounds. The expected loss is 400 − 300 = 100 pounds. Answer: Amir should expect to be about £100 down. The distractors: £300 is the expected winnings on their own, with the cost of playing never taken off; £400 is the total cost of playing, with the winnings never taken off; £700 comes from adding the two totals, 400 + 300 = 700, instead of subtracting one from the other.
- (c) The mean, because every value counts towards it, so 100 pulls it from 7 up to about 20.3. — Method: work each measure out before the extra value is added and again afterwards, then compare the size of the two changes. Working: before, the six values total 42, so the mean is 42 ÷ 6 = 7, and the middle pair 6 and 8 give a median of (6 + 8) ÷ 2 = 7; after, the seven values total 142, so the mean is 142 ÷ 7 = 20.29 to 2 decimal places, while the median is now the 4th of the seven ordered values, which is 8; the mean has moved by about 13.3 and the median by 1. Answer: the mean, because every value counts towards it, so 100 pulls it from 7 up to about 20.3 — this is why the median is often preferred when a data set contains an outlier. The distractors: the reply that the mean rises by 100 adds the extra value to the mean instead of adding it to the total; the reply that the median moves to 12 takes the largest of the original values as the new middle instead of counting to the 4th of the seven values; the reply about even and odd counts quotes a rule that does not exist, since the median moved because a very large value was added, not because the count of values changed.
- (d) x⁽¹⁄²⁾ — Method: dividing two powers of the same letter subtracts the index of the divisor from the index of the term being divided, and fractional indices are subtracted like any other fractions. Working: 3/4 − 1/4 = 2/4, which simplifies to 1/2, so the result is x⁽¹⁄²⁾. Answer: x⁽¹⁄²⁾. The distractors: x comes from adding the indices, 3/4 + 1/4 = 1, as though the powers were being multiplied; x³ comes from dividing the indices, so that 3/4 divided by 1/4 gives 3; x⁽³⁄¹⁶⁾ comes from multiplying the indices, 3/4 × 1/4.
- (b) h = 2A/b — The height has been multiplied by the base and the result then divided by 2, so undo the division first. Multiplying both sides by 2 gives 2A = bh. Undoing the multiplication by the base comes next: dividing both sides by b gives 2A/b = h, so h = 2A/b. Dividing by 2 instead of multiplying gives A/(2b), a quarter of the correct height; multiplying by the base instead of dividing gives 2Ab; writing b/(2A) turns the final fraction upside down.
- (b) No — rate fell by 3.7 thousand/month — Each tangent gradient is the instantaneous growth rate, in thousand subscribers per month. To compare them, subtract the later rate from the earlier one: 4.8 − 1.1 = 3.7. Since 1.1 is less than 4.8, the growth rate has fallen by 3.7 thousand subscribers per month, so the manager is wrong — the app is growing more slowly at 18 months, not faster. Subtracting the other way round and calling the result a rise, 'rate rose by 3.7 thousand/month', gets the direction backwards: the later gradient is the smaller of the two. Adding the two gradients, 4.8 + 1.1 = 5.9, and calling this a combined rate that shows speeding up, is the wrong operation for comparing two rates. Treating the difference 3.7 as a total number of subscribers lost, rather than a rate in thousands per month, confuses a rate with a count. Always subtract the two rates in a sensible order and keep the units in thousands per month.
- (d) 15 cm — Arc length = (angle ÷ 360) × 2 × π × r. Here 120 ÷ 360 = 1/3, and 2 × 3.14 = 6.28, so 31.4 = (1/3) × 6.28 × r. Multiplying both sides by 3 gives 6.28 × r = 94.2, so r = 94.2 ÷ 6.28 = 15 cm. (5 cm comes from forgetting the angle fraction altogether and dividing the arc length by 2 × π alone: 31.4 ÷ 6.28 = 5; 30 cm comes from leaving out the factor of 2, dividing by (1/3) × 3.14 = 1.0467 instead of (1/3) × 6.28: 31.4 ÷ 1.0467 = 30; 7.5 cm comes from correctly finding a radius of 15 cm but then treating that 15 cm as a diameter and halving it.)
- (a) 9/25 — Method: P(badminton | tennis) = n(tennis and badminton) ÷ n(tennis) — restrict to the tennis-players, then find what fraction of them also play badminton. Working: n(tennis and badminton) = 18, n(tennis) = 50, so P(badminton | tennis) = 18/50 = 9/25. Answer: 9/25. Watch out: dividing by 40 (the badminton total) finds P(tennis | badminton) instead of P(badminton | tennis) — the wrong direction. Dividing by 90 (all the members named in the question) ignores that you already know the member plays tennis. And dividing by 72 (50 + 40 − 18, the number who play at least one of the two sports) answers a question about the union, not the condition you were given.
- (a) to the nearest centimetre — Method: the error interval of a rounded measurement runs from half a unit below the stated value to half a unit above it, so the width of the interval is one whole unit of the accuracy used. Working: the interval runs from 24.5 to 25.5, a width of 25.5 − 24.5 = 1, so the unit of accuracy is 1 cm; the stated value is the midpoint, 25 cm, and 25 correct to the nearest centimetre is exactly what gives 24.5 ≤ L < 25.5. Answer: to the nearest centimetre. To the nearest 0.5 cm comes from reading the half-unit, 0.5, as the accuracy itself instead of doubling it back to the full unit. To 1 decimal place comes from seeing the bounds written with one decimal place and taking that as the accuracy, but the bounds of a value given to 1 decimal place would be only 0.05 either side. To the nearest 10 cm comes from confusing the size of the value, about 25, with the unit it was rounded to; rounding to the nearest 10 cm would give an interval 5 cm either side of the stated value.
- (a) 7 — Multiply the input by 2: 6 × 2 = 12. Then subtract 5: 12 − 5 = 7. A candidate who does the operations in the wrong order, subtracting 5 first and then multiplying by 2, gets (6 − 5) × 2 = 2. A candidate who only carries out the multiplication and forgets to subtract gets 12. A candidate who adds 5 instead of subtracting gets 6 × 2 + 5 = 17.
- (d) 24 — Method: split 60 into 3 + 7 = 10 equal parts, find the value of one part, then use the difference in ratio parts. Working: 60 ÷ 10 = 6, so the numbers are 3 × 6 = 18 and 7 × 6 = 42, and their difference is 42 − 18 = 24. Answer: 24. 4 comes from finding the difference between the ratio numbers, 7 − 3, but forgetting to multiply by the value of one part. 60 comes from adding the two numbers back together instead of subtracting, which just repeats the given sum. 80 comes from dividing 60 by the first ratio number, 3, instead of by the total number of parts, 10, giving a part value of 20 and a difference of 7 × 20 − 3 × 20 = 80.
- (b) $\binom{-6}{10}$ — Translating twice by the same vector doubles both components: 2 × $\binom{-3}{5}$ = $\binom{-6}{10}$. $\binom{-3}{5}$ forgets to double the vector at all, giving only one translation's worth. $\binom{-9}{15}$ trebles the vector instead of doubling it. $\binom{-6}{5}$ doubles only the top number and forgets to double the bottom number.
- (a) −7 — The coefficient of xy is the number multiplying that exact term, including its sign: in 4x²y − 7xy + 2, the term in xy is −7xy, so the coefficient is −7. Answering 7 correctly picks out the number but drops the minus sign that belongs to it. Answering 4 picks the coefficient of the x²y term instead of the xy term — x²y and xy are different terms because their powers of x differ. Answering −5 combines −7 with the constant term +2, as though the coefficient of xy included the number with no letter attached to it. The coefficient of xy is −7.
- (b) 7980 — After the first year: 8000 × 0.95 = 7600. After the second year: 7600 × 1.05 = 7980. 8000 comes from assuming a 5% decrease followed by a 5% increase returns exactly to the starting number — it does not, because the increase acts on the smaller, already-reduced number. 8400 comes from applying only the second year's 5% increase to the original number: 8000 × 1.05 = 8400. 7600 comes from applying only the first year's 5% decrease and stopping there, without applying the second year's increase.
- (a) where the angle bisector meets the posts' perpendicular bisector — Being equidistant from the two walls means lying on the angle bisector of the corner; being equidistant from the two posts means lying on the perpendicular bisector of the 4 m segment joining them. A single point satisfying both conditions is wherever those two loci cross. "where the angle bisector meets the line joining the posts" uses the straight line between the posts instead of its perpendicular bisector — a point on that line is not generally equidistant from both posts. "the perpendicular bisector of the posts, alone" satisfies only the posts condition, ignoring the walls entirely. "the angle bisector of the corner, alone" satisfies only the walls condition, ignoring the posts entirely.
- (d) Yes, because 3² + 4² = 25. — A point lies on the circle x² + y² = 25 exactly when substituting its coordinates makes the equation true. Squaring each coordinate separately and adding: 3² + 4² = 9 + 16 = 25, which matches the right-hand side, so (3, 4) does lie on the circle. Adding the coordinates without squaring them, 3 + 4 = 7, and then reasoning that 7 is less than 25 happens to reach the same verdict, but it is not testing the equation of the circle at all — the circle equation depends on x² + y², not x + y. Squaring the sum instead of summing the squares, (3 + 4)² = 49, not 25, wrongly rules the point out. Doubling each coordinate instead of squaring it, so that 4² is taken as 8, gives 9 + 8 = 17, not 25, which also wrongly rules the point out.
- (c) y = 3x + 5 — Method: find the gradient from the two points, then substitute one point into y = mx + c to find c. Working: gradient = (14 − 2) ÷ (3 − (−1)) = 12 ÷ 4 = 3. Using the point (3, 14): 14 = 3(3) + c, so 14 = 9 + c, giving c = 5. Answer: y = 3x + 5. y = 6x − 4 comes from mishandling the negative x-coordinate, treating 3 − (−1) as 3 − 1 = 2, so the gradient becomes 12 ÷ 2 = 6, and then c = 14 − 18 = −4. y = 3x + 23 comes from a sign error isolating c, adding 9 to 14 instead of subtracting it: c = 14 + 9 = 23. y = x/3 + 13 comes from dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round, giving a gradient of 4 ÷ 12 = 1/3, and then c = 14 − 1 = 13.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.