Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 12 — Method: division and multiplication have equal priority, so they are carried out in the order they are written, from left to right; a negative divided by a negative is positive. Working: (−36) ÷ (−6) = 6, and then 6 × 2 = 12. Answer: 12. The distractors: 3 comes from carrying out the multiplication first, (−6) × 2 = −12 followed by (−36) ÷ (−12) = 3; −12 comes from treating a negative divided by a negative as negative, giving −6 and then −6 × 2 = −12; 6 comes from stopping at the division and never carrying out the multiplication by 2.
- (d) The graph never crosses either axis — Since x ≠ 0, there is no point on the graph where x = 0, so it cannot cross the y-axis; likewise 1/x is never equal to 0 for any x, so it cannot cross the x-axis either — the graph never touches either axis. A candidate who forgets the restriction x ≠ 0 might think the graph behaves like other graphs and passes through the origin, (0, 0). A candidate who correctly rules out the x-axis but forgets that x = 0 is also excluded might say the graph crosses the y-axis but never the x-axis. A candidate who only pictures the branch where x and y are both positive might say the graph has only one branch, in quadrant 1, forgetting the second branch where x and y are both negative.
- (d) 7/4 — A part-to-part ratio a : b gives the fraction a/b when the first quantity is written as a fraction of the second, so 7 : 4 gives 7/4. Writing 4/7 puts the parts the wrong way round — blue as a fraction of red, not red as a fraction of blue. Writing 7/11 uses the total number of counters, 7 + 4 = 11, as the denominator instead of the number of blue counters — that is red as a fraction of the whole bag, not red as a fraction of blue. Writing 11/7 has both the wrong denominator and the parts inverted.
- (c) 100.5 m — The curved part of a semicircular bend is half of a full circle's circumference. The full circumference would be 2 × 3.14 × 32 = 200.96 m, and half of that is 200.96 ÷ 2 = 100.48 m, which rounds to 100.5 m. Choosing 201.0 m uses the FULL circumference, forgetting to halve it for a semicircle. Choosing 50.2 m halves the radius as well as taking a semicircle, using 3.14 × 16 = 50.24 m instead of the correct radius of 32 m. Choosing 64.0 m uses the diameter, 2 × 32 = 64, as if it were the curved length, ignoring π and the semicircle shape entirely.
- (b) 3 times as likely — Method: to say how many times as likely one event is as another, divide the larger probability by the smaller one; subtracting them gives the gap between the two probabilities, not the multiple. Working: both probabilities are counted in tenths, so 6/10 ÷ 2/10 compares 6 tenths with 2 tenths, and 6 ÷ 2 = 3. Answer: winning at the hoopla stall is 3 times as likely, which is why 6/10 sits three times as far along the 0 to 1 scale as 2/10. The distractors: 4 times as likely comes from subtracting the two counts, 6 − 2, instead of dividing them, which measures the gap rather than the multiple; 6 times as likely comes from reading the larger probability's 6 tenths straight off as the multiple without ever comparing it with the 2 tenths at the other stall; 12 times as likely comes from multiplying the two counts, 6 × 2, instead of dividing one by the other.
- (c) 20 kg ≤ mass < 30 kg — The modal class is the class with the highest frequency. Reading the plotted points, the frequencies are 6, 10, 16, 6 and 2, so the highest frequency is 16, plotted at the midpoint 25. A class of width 10 centred on 25 runs from 25 − 5 = 20 to 25 + 5 = 30, so the modal class is 20 kg ≤ mass < 30 kg. Writing '25 kg' gives only the midpoint, not the class — the modal class is an interval, not a single value. '10 kg ≤ mass < 20 kg' is the class before the peak, centred on 15, which has frequency 10, not the highest. '30 kg ≤ mass < 40 kg' is the class after the peak, centred on 35, which has frequency 6, not the highest.
- (a) 7 — Dividing by 0.1 is the same as multiplying by 10, so 0.7 ÷ 0.1 = 7. Meera's answer of 0.07 comes from dividing 0.7 by 10 instead of by 0.1, the wrong way round. A candidate who confuses 0.1 with 0.01 multiplies by 100 instead of 10 and gets 70. A candidate who thinks dividing by a number less than 1 does not change the value gets 0.7.
- (c) (2n + 1)² + (2n + 3)² = (4n² + 4n + 1) + (4n² + 12n + 9) = 8n² + 16n + 10 = 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2, and n² + 2n + 1 is an integer, so the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. — Expand each square carefully: (2n + 1)² = 4n² + 4n + 1 and (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 12n + 9, since the cross term is 2 × 2n × 3 = 12n. Adding gives 8n² + 16n + 10, and factorising out 8 from every term that can hold one gives 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2; since n² + 2n + 1 is always an integer, the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. The attempt reaching 8(n² + 2n) + 10 has the correct expansion but stops the factorisation one step early — it never pulls a further 8 out of the 10 (10 = 8 + 2), so 'always 10 more than a multiple of 8' should be reduced to 'always 2 more than a multiple of 8'. The attempt reaching 2(4n² + 8n + 5) also has the correct expansion, and the factorisation is true, but 'always even' only shows the sum is a multiple of 2 — being even is necessary but nowhere near sufficient to be a multiple of 8, and the argument never finds the extra factor of 4. The fourth attempt makes an expansion slip, using (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 9 instead of 4n² + 12n + 9 — dropping the 12n cross term entirely — so it works from the wrong expression 8n² + 4n + 10 throughout, and no amount of correct working afterwards can recover the right conclusion.
- (a) 4:3:1 — Convert every part to the same unit: 2 m = 200 cm, so the ratio is 200 : 150 : 50. Dividing all three parts by 50 gives 4 : 3 : 1. Writing 2 : 150 : 50 has not converted 2 m into centimetres, so the units do not match. Writing 3 : 4 : 1 has the first two parts the wrong way round. Writing 4 : 3 : 2 comes from an arithmetic slip on the last part: 50 ÷ 50 = 1, not 2.
- (a) 89.6° — Angle PQR is at vertex Q, so the side opposite it is PR = 13 cm. Using the cosine rule rearranged for an angle: cos(PQR) = (121 + 49 − 169) ÷ (2 × 11 × 7) = 1 ÷ 154 = 0.0065. Taking the inverse cosine, angle PQR = 89.6° (1 d.p.). Using PR as one of the enclosing sides instead of as the opposite side, finding angle P instead of angle Q, gives (121 + 169 − 49) ÷ (2 × 11 × 13) = 241 ÷ 286 = 0.8427, and angle = 32.6°. Swapping the sign inside the bracket, computing 169 − 121 − 49 instead, gives −1 ÷ 154 = −0.0065, and angle = 90.4°. Using PR in the denominator instead of QR gives (121 + 49 − 169) ÷ (2 × 11 × 13) = 1 ÷ 286 = 0.0035, and angle = 89.8°. Keep PR as the opposite side, QR and PQ as the enclosing sides, and angle PQR comes to 89.6°.
- (a) 753 — The estimate from 2000 spins is the most reliable, since it comes from the largest sample size, so the best estimate of the probability is 0.251. Over a further 3000 spins, the expected number landing on green is 3000 × 0.251 = 753. Writing 1050 is wrong because 3000 × 0.350 = 1050 uses the estimate from only 20 spins, the LEAST reliable of the three. Writing 870 is wrong because 3000 × 0.290 = 870 uses the estimate from 200 spins rather than the more reliable 2000-spin estimate. Writing 750 is wrong because 3000 × 0.25 = 750 ignores the recorded data completely and simply assumes each of the 4 colours is equally likely. The best estimate is 753 expected green spins.
- (a) the nearest whole number — The error intervals are 23.5 ≤ p < 24.5 and 5.5 ≤ q < 6.5. The minimum of p ÷ q is 23.5 ÷ 6.5 ≈ 3.615, and the maximum is 24.5 ÷ 5.5 ≈ 4.455. Both of these round to 4 at the nearest whole number, so the answer is guaranteed correct to the nearest whole number — but not to the nearest 0.1, since 3.615 rounds to 3.6 while 4.455 rounds to 4.5, which do not agree. Claiming the nearest 0.1 assumes every figure a calculator shows is trustworthy, without checking whether the bounds actually agree that far. Claiming only the nearest 10 badly understates how much can be guaranteed here, since both bounds already round to 4, not merely to 0. Saying no degree of accuracy can be guaranteed gives up before checking whether the bounds agree at any level at all.
- (a) 6x + 12 — A regular hexagon has 6 equal sides, so the perimeter is 6(x + 2) = 6x + 12. A candidate who multiplies only the x-term by 6 and forgets to multiply the 2 gets 6x + 2. A candidate who multiplies only the number term by 6 and forgets to multiply the x gets x + 12. A candidate who adds 6 and 2 to make a single coefficient of x instead of expanding the brackets gets 8x.
- (b) 0.22 km — The real one-way distance is 4.4 × 2500 = 11000 cm. Converting units: 11000 ÷ 100 = 110 m, and 110 ÷ 1000 = 0.11 km. Since the jogger runs there and back, the total distance is 0.11 × 2 = 0.22 km. 0.11 km comes from working out only the one-way distance and forgetting the return journey. 220 km comes from correctly doubling the one-way distance in metres, 110 × 2 = 220, but leaving it mislabelled as kilometres instead of converting metres to kilometres. 110 km comes from working out only the one-way distance in metres, 110, and mislabelling it as kilometres.
- (a) (−1, 1) — Translating by $\binom{−2}{3}$ subtracts 2 from every x-coordinate and adds 3 to every y-coordinate. This gives image vertices (−1, 4), (3, 4), (3, 7) and (−1, 7). The point (−1, 1) is not one of these: it has the correct new x-coordinate (1 − 2 = −1) but keeps the original y-coordinate (1) instead of adding 3, as if only the horizontal part of the vector had been applied.
- (d) The fixed call-out fee, charged before the hourly rate. — Method: compare the formula with C = (fixed charge) + (rate) × h, where the fixed charge is the part that does not depend on h. Working: in C = 40 + 25h, the term 25h depends on the number of hours, h, but 40 does not change however many hours the job takes. Answer: 40 is the fixed call-out fee. 'The hourly rate' confuses the fixed term with the coefficient of h, which is actually 25. 'The total cost for a job lasting 1 hour' comes from substituting h = 1 into the formula (40 + 25 = 65) rather than reading off the constant term. 'The number of hours worked before charging starts' wrongly treats the constant, which is in pounds, as if it were measured in hours.
- (a) 8/5 — Scaling down from 8 people to 5 people uses the multiplier 5/8. To reverse this and scale back up from 5 people to 8 people, use the reciprocal of that multiplier: flip 5/8 to get 8/5. 5/8 comes from using the forward (scaling down) multiplier again, instead of reversing it. 3/5 comes from writing the difference in people (8 − 5 = 3) over 5, instead of using the reciprocal of 5/8. 25/64 comes from multiplying the forward multiplier by itself (5/8 × 5/8), instead of finding its reciprocal.
- (b) (3, −5) — Method: apply the rotation to the point first, then translate the image, in the order the question gives them. Working: rotating (4, 1) by 90° clockwise about the origin sends (x, y) to (y, −x), so (4, 1) becomes (1, −4). Translating (1, −4) by the vector (2, −1) gives 1 + 2 = 3 and −4 − 1 = −5, so the final image is (3, −5). Answer: (3, −5). Use the CLOCKWISE rule, (x, y) → (y, −x), not the anticlockwise one, and apply the rotation before the translation, exactly as the question states them: reversing the order or the direction of turn both land on a different point.
- (b) −5 — Method: a point whose x-coordinate is 0 lies on the y-axis, so its y-coordinate is the constant c; once m and c are both known the equation can be written down and x substituted into it. Working: the line passes through (0, 1), so c = 1 and the equation is y = −3x + 1; substituting x = 2 gives y = −3 × 2 + 1 = −6 + 1 = −5. Answer: −5. The distractors: 7 comes from ignoring the minus sign on the gradient and working out 3 × 2 + 1; 5 comes from working out 3 × 2 = 6 and then using the minus sign to take the constant off the product, 6 − 1 = 5; −7 comes from subtracting the constant instead of adding it, −6 − 1 = −7.
- (b) x ≥ 5 — Expand the bracket: 2(3x − 1) = 6x − 2, so the inequality is 6x − 2 ≥ 4x + 8. Subtract 4x from both sides and add 2 to both sides: 2x ≥ 10. Divide both sides by 2: x ≥ 5. A candidate who only multiplies the 3x by 2 and forgets to multiply the −1 gets 6x − 1 ≥ 4x + 8, leading to x ≥ 4.5. A candidate who adds 4x instead of subtracting it gets 10x ≥ 10, leading to x ≥ 1. A candidate who multiplies by 2 instead of dividing gets x ≥ 20.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.