Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) x⁶ — Method: work through the powers in order — multiplying powers of the same base means adding indices, and dividing powers of the same base means subtracting indices. Working: first, x⁵ × x³ = x⁸ (adding 5 and 3); then x⁸ ÷ x² = x⁶ (subtracting 2 from 8). x⁴ comes from swapping the two rules — subtracting for the multiplication, 5 − 3 = 2, and then adding for the division, 2 + 2 = 4. x¹⁰ comes from adding all three indices, 5 + 3 + 2 = 10, treating the division the same as a multiplication. 6x comes from correctly reaching a total index of 6 but then writing it as a coefficient of x instead of as its power. Answer: x⁶.
- (b) −5 — Method: a point whose x-coordinate is 0 lies on the y-axis, so its y-coordinate is the constant c; once m and c are both known the equation can be written down and x substituted into it. Working: the line passes through (0, 1), so c = 1 and the equation is y = −3x + 1; substituting x = 2 gives y = −3 × 2 + 1 = −6 + 1 = −5. Answer: −5. The distractors: 7 comes from ignoring the minus sign on the gradient and working out 3 × 2 + 1; 5 comes from working out 3 × 2 = 6 and then using the minus sign to take the constant off the product, 6 − 1 = 5; −7 comes from subtracting the constant instead of adding it, −6 − 1 = −7.
- (c) 183 mg — Apply the decay, then add the new dose, once for each hour. Hour 1: 0.7 × 200 = 140, then 140 + 50 = 190. Hour 2: 0.7 × 190 = 133, then 133 + 50 = 183, so there is 183 mg after 2 hours. Forgetting the top-up dose and only applying the decay gives 0.7 × 200 = 140, then 0.7 × 140 = 98 — this ignores that a further 50 mg is given every hour. Adding the 50 mg BEFORE the decay is applied, instead of after, gives 0.7 × (200 + 50) = 175, then 0.7 × (175 + 50) = 157.5, which changes how much of the dose is eliminated in the same hour it is given. Multiplying by 0.3, the percentage ELIMINATED, instead of by 0.7, the percentage REMAINING, gives 0.3 × 200 + 50 = 110, then 0.3 × 110 + 50 = 83 — this mixes up the amount that leaves the bloodstream with the amount that stays in it. Always check whether a percentage describes what remains or what is removed before choosing the multiplier.
- (b) 10.5 m² — The area of a trapezium is half of the sum of the parallel sides, multiplied by the width. Add the parallel sides: 2.5 + 4.5 = 7. Multiply by the width: 7 × 3 = 21. Half of 21 is 10.5 m². 21 m² forgets to halve, using the full (2.5+4.5)×3. 3.5 m² averages the two parallel sides, (2.5+4.5)÷2 = 3.5, but forgets to multiply by the width. 6.75 m² treats the bed as a triangle, using only the longer parallel side: half of 4.5 × 3.
- (c) 9/28 — Method: two linked steps. Total everyone whose test is positive, since the person picked is known to be one of them, then divide the positive tests that belong to people with the condition by that total. Working: 45 positive tests come from people who have the condition and 95 come from people who do not, so 140 tests are positive. The people with the condition give 45/140, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 5 gives 9/28. Answer: the probability is 9/28. The distractors: 9/10 is 45/50, the probability of a positive test given that the person has the condition, which is the condition and the event the wrong way round and is the figure a candidate quotes when the two are confused; 9/200 is 45/1000, dividing by everyone tested rather than by the 140 who tested positive; 1/20 is 50/1000, the probability that a person has the condition before the test result is used at all.
- (c) Neither causes the other; sunshine links both. — Both ice cream sales and sunburn cases tend to rise on hot, sunny days, so the amount of sunshine is a third factor linked to both — neither variable causes the other. Saying ice cream sales cause the sunburn assumes a causal link in one direction that the correlation alone cannot establish. Saying sunburn cases cause the ice cream sales assumes the reverse causal link, which is no more justified. Saying a strong correlation always means causation is the general error this question is testing: correlation, however strong, does not by itself prove that one variable causes the other.
- (c) Yes — the greatest possible total is 493.5 kg, under 500 kg — 493 kg correct to the nearest kg means the true total mass, m, satisfies 492.5 kg ≤ m < 493.5 kg. The greatest possible total is 493.5 kg, which is under the 500 kg safe working load, so the four people are definitely within it. 'The true total could be as high as 498 kg' comes from treating 'nearest kg' as an error of ±5 kg instead of ±0.5 kg. 'Cannot be decided without the exact total' overlooks that the error interval already gives the greatest possible total, so the decision can be made without knowing the exact figure. '493 kg is only an estimate, so it may be over 500 kg' ignores that the error interval is bounded — the true total cannot exceed 493.5 kg, well under 500 kg.
- (b) a = 7; turning point (4, 2) — A vertical translation y = f(x) + a moves every point on the graph up or down by a, so the x-coordinate of the turning point stays at 4 and the minimum value becomes −5 + a. Setting −5 + a = 2 and solving gives a = 7, so the new turning point is (4, 2). Rearranging −5 + a = 2 with a sign error, treating it as a = −5 − 2, gives a = −7 while still landing on the correct turning-point coordinates. Correctly finding a = 7 but then writing down the original turning point instead of the shifted one gives (4, −5). Assuming a is simply equal to the new minimum value itself, ignoring the original −5 entirely, gives a = 2.
- (d) 8/5 — Two masses can only be compared once they are in the same unit. Since 1 kg is 1000 g, the recipe needs 1200 g. The recipe's mass is being written as a fraction of Dan's mass, so 1200 goes on the top and 750 on the bottom, giving 1200/750. The highest common factor of the two is 150: 1200 ÷ 150 = 8 and 750 ÷ 150 = 5. The fraction is 8/5, which is greater than 1 because the recipe needs more flour than Dan has.
- (b) trapezium — A quadrilateral with exactly one pair of parallel sides is a trapezium; field ABCD has AB parallel to DC and no other pair of parallel sides, so trapezium is correct. Parallelogram requires BOTH pairs of opposite sides to be parallel, but the plan says only AB and DC are parallel. Rhombus requires all four sides to be equal in length, which is not stated here. A kite is defined by two pairs of adjacent equal sides, not by having a pair of parallel sides, so it does not match this description either.
- (a) 50 — To find the number of shots needed for an expected 12 hits, divide the number of hits wanted by the probability of a hit: 12 ÷ 0.24 = 50. Multiplying the number of hits by the probability instead of dividing gives 12 × 0.24 = 2.88, which rounds to 3 shots. Rounding 0.24 to 0.25 before dividing gives 12 ÷ 0.25 = 48. Using the probability of missing, 1 − 0.24 = 0.76, instead of the probability of hitting, gives 12 ÷ 0.76 = 15.79, which rounds to 16.
- (a) 200 g — One quarter of 160 g is 40 g. Increasing the amount means adding this on: 160 + 40 = 200 g. Finding the increase, 1/4 of 160 = 40 g, but stopping there without adding it to the original amount leaves just 40 g. Using 4/5 instead of 5/4 as the scaling fraction, 160 × 4/5 = 128 g, actually decreases the amount rather than increasing it. Increasing by a half instead of a quarter, 160 + 80 = 240 g, uses the wrong fraction of 160.
- (c) x = 0 or x = 3 — Method: take out the common factor 5x: 5x(x − 3) = 0, so 5x = 0 or x − 3 = 0, giving x = 0 or x = 3. Distractor origins: x = 0 or x = 15 comes from forgetting to divide the second term by the common factor 5x correctly, leaving 15 instead of 3; x = 3 loses the solution x = 0 by dividing both sides by x; x = 5 or x = 3 mistakes the coefficient 5 itself for one of the solutions.
- (d) 90 cm — Method: scale each dimension by the scale factor, then find the perimeter. Working: model height = 240 ÷ 8 = 30 cm; model width = 120 ÷ 8 = 15 cm. Perimeter = 2 × (30 + 15) = 90 cm. Wrong options: 11.25 cm comes from squaring the scale factor as if finding an area (720 ÷ 64); 510 cm comes from scaling only one dimension and leaving the other at full size; 720 cm comes from finding the real perimeter (2 × (240 + 120)) but forgetting to scale it down at all.
- (a) 114.6° — Using the sine rule, sin(ACB) = AB × sin(ABC) ÷ AC = 6 × sin(40°) ÷ 9. Since sin(40°) ≈ 0.64279, this gives sin(ACB) ≈ 3.8567 ÷ 9 ≈ 0.42852, so angle ACB ≈ 25.4° or its supplement, 154.6°. Testing the obtuse candidate: 40° + 154.6° = 194.6°, which already exceeds 180°, so angle BAC would have to be negative — impossible, so 154.6° is rejected. With angle ACB ≈ 25.4°, angle BAC = 180° − 40° − 25.4° = 114.6°. 25.4° is angle ACB, not angle BAC that the question asks for. 14.6° comes from using the invalid 154.6° candidate anyway and then wrongly turning the resulting negative angle sum (−14.6°) positive instead of rejecting it. 65.4° comes from inverting the sine rule ratio — dividing AC × sin(ABC) by AB instead of AB × sin(ABC) by AC — which gives a different, incorrect candidate for angle ACB entirely.
- (c) y = 3x + 1 — Method: a line of known gradient m has equation y = mx + c, and c is found by substituting the coordinates of a point known to lie on it. Working: the gradient is 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 4 gives 4 = 3 × 1 + c, so c = 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: y = 3x + 1. The distractors: y = 3x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 3 − 4 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = x + 3 comes from swapping the two numbers over, putting the gradient 3 in the constant position and the x-coordinate 1 in front of x; y = 3x + 4 comes from using the y-coordinate 4 as the constant without substituting.
- (b) £250 — Since cost is proportional to the cube of the radius, C = kr³. Using r = 3, C = 54: 3³ = 27, so 54 = k × 27, giving k = 54 ÷ 27 = 2. The equation is C = 2r³. When r = 5: 5³ = 125, so C = 2 × 125 = 250. Treating the relationship as proportional to r² instead of r³ gives k = 54 ÷ 9 = 6 and then C = 6 × 25 = 150, which models area scaling, not volume scaling. Treating it as proportional to r itself gives k = 54 ÷ 3 = 18 and then C = 18 × 5 = 90. Finding k correctly from the cube but then multiplying it by the radius instead of by the cube of the radius gives 2 × 5 = 10, which applies the right constant to the wrong power of r. The cost of a container of radius 5 cm is £250.
- (c) 18 — Method: divide the real length by 5 to find how many 'units' of 5 m it contains, then multiply by 2 cm for each unit. Working: 45 ÷ 5 = 9, so the real bridge is 9 lots of 5 m; each lot is represented by 2 cm on the model, so the model length is 9 × 2 = 18 cm. Options: 9 comes from stopping after the division, without multiplying by the 2 cm per unit; 90 comes from multiplying the real length by 2 directly, without dividing by 5 first; 4.5 comes from dividing by 5 and then dividing by 2 again, instead of multiplying by 2. Answer: 18.
- (b) 3n + 1 — Method: find how many more tiles each pattern uses, then find the constant by adjusting pattern 1's total. Working: each pattern uses 3 more tiles than the last, so the coefficient of n is 3. The constant is pattern 1's total minus the common difference: 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: the nth term is 3n + 1. 3n + 4 comes from using pattern 1's total, 4, as the constant without subtracting the common difference. 3n − 2 comes from a slip in working out the constant, subtracting the common difference twice (4 − 3 − 3 = −2) instead of once. n + 3 comes from swapping the common difference and the constant.
- (c) Line D — Method: the steeper of two lines is the one whose gradient is greater, and the gradient of a line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x. Working: line C rises 2 for a run of 4, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 4 = 1/2; the other line rises 2 for a run of 2, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 2 = 1; since 1 is greater than 1/2, it is line D that is the steeper. Answer: Line D. The distractors: Line C is chosen by comparing the x-coordinates and calling the line that reaches further along the x-axis the steeper one; They are equally steep comes from comparing only the y-coordinates, which are both 2, without dividing by the two different runs; There is not enough information comes from believing that a gradient can only be measured off a drawn graph, when two points on a line are enough to work it out.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.