Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 2/5 — The ratio 2:3 has 2 + 3 = 5 parts in total, and the larger plot is 3 of those parts. Since the larger plot is 18 m², each part is 18 ÷ 3 = 6 m², so the total area is 5 × 6 = 30 m² and the smaller plot is 2 × 6 = 12 m². The fraction of the total area taken up by the smaller plot is 12/30, which simplifies to 2/5. Giving the fraction for the larger plot instead of the smaller one gives 3/5. Comparing the smaller plot to the larger plot instead of to the total area gives 2/3. Assuming the two plots split the area evenly, ignoring the given ratio altogether, gives 1/2.
- (a) 3y² — 'y squared, multiplied by 3' means the square is applied to y only, and the result is then multiplied by 3, written as 3y². Writing y³ mistakes the multiplication by 3 for an extra factor of y, adding to the power instead of using a coefficient. Writing (3y)² squares the whole of 3y, including the 3, which gives 9y² rather than 3y² — the square should apply to y alone. Writing 3 + y² adds the 3 instead of multiplying by it. The expression for 'y squared, multiplied by 3' is 3y².
- (c) 6.00 m — Method: the ratio of height to shadow length is the same for both objects. Working: road sign height ÷ shadow = 3 ÷ 5 = 0.6. Lamppost height = 0.6 × 10 = 6.00 m. Wrong options: 16.67 m comes from inverting the ratio, using shadow ÷ height instead of height ÷ shadow (10 × 5 ÷ 3); 8.00 m comes from adding the difference between the two shadow lengths to the road sign's height instead of scaling (3 + (10 − 5)); 1.50 m comes from multiplying by the ratio of the two shadow lengths the wrong way round (3 × 5 ÷ 10).
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
- (a) 4/9 — Method: two steps. Find how many cars failed altogether, because the car picked is known to be one of them, then divide the diesel failures by that total. Working: 30 petrol cars and 24 diesel cars failed, so 54 cars failed. The diesel failures give 24/54, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 6 gives 4/9. Answer: the probability is 4/9. The distractors: 3/10 is 24/80, the probability that a car fails given that it is a diesel car, which is the condition and the event swapped; 3/25 is 24/200, dividing by every car serviced that week rather than by the 54 that failed; 2/5 is 80/200, the probability that a car chosen from the whole week is a diesel car, which ignores the fact that the car picked failed.
- (d) 25 — Method: the median is estimated at position n ÷ 2 in the cumulative frequency table, then interpolated across the class it falls in: lower boundary, plus the fraction of the way through the class, times the class width. Working: there are 80 sacks, so the median sits at position 80 ÷ 2 = 40. Before the class 20 ≤ m < 30 the cumulative frequency is 22, and by the end of it, it is 58, so this class holds the 40th sack; its frequency is 58 − 22 = 36 and its width is 30 − 20 = 10. The extra distance needed into the class is 40 − 22 = 18, and 18 ÷ 36 × 10 = 5, so the median is 20 + 5 = 25. Answer: the estimated median mass is 25 kg. Watch which numbers the interpolation uses: reading off just the lower boundary of the median class, 20, ignores how far into that class the 40th sack actually falls; treating n ÷ 2 = 40 itself as the median mass mistakes a position in the list for a mass in kilograms; and using the target position, 40, as the extra distance into the class instead of subtracting the sacks already counted changes the calculation to 20 + 40 ÷ 36 × 10. That comes to 20 + 11.1 = 31.1, overshooting the class because it never subtracts the 22 sacks already counted before it.
- (b) £72 — One fifth of £60 = £12. New price = £60 + £12 = £72. A candidate who gives the increase instead of the new price gets £12. A candidate who subtracts the increase instead of adding it gets £60 − £12 = £48. A candidate who uses 1/4 instead of 1/5 gets £60 + £15 = £75.
- (c) 4 — x² + 12x + 40 = (x + 6)² − 6² + 40 = (x + 6)² + 4, so a = 6 and b = 4. Since (x + 6)² can never be negative, y = (x + 6)² + 4 is smallest when the bracket is zero, so the minimum value of y is 4. Giving 40 instead reads off the ORIGINAL constant term and ignores the completing-the-square step entirely — wrong, because 40 is the value of y when x = 0, not the minimum value. Giving −6 instead answers with the x-coordinate of the turning point (where the bracket is zero) rather than the minimum y-value itself — wrong, because the question asks for the minimum value of y, not the value of x that produces it. Giving 36 instead stops after squaring half the coefficient, 6² = 36, without combining it with the 40 already in the expression — wrong, because the minimum value is 40 minus 36, not 36 on its own.
- (c) 3 : 5 — If orange juice is 3/8 of the total, apple juice is the remaining 1 − 3/8 = 5/8. The ratio of orange to apple is therefore 3 : 5. Inverting gives 5 : 3, apple to orange instead of orange to apple. Using the denominator 8 as the second part of the ratio, 3 : 8, compares orange juice to the whole drink rather than to the apple juice alone. Pairing the total 8 with the apple fraction's numerator 5 gives 8 : 5, which mixes a whole-total figure with a part figure.
- (c) 24 — PQ lies along the x-axis with length 6, and PR lies along the y-axis with length 8, meeting at a right angle at P, so QR = √(6² + 8²) = √100 = 10. The perimeter is 6 + 8 + 10 = 24. "14" adds only the two shorter sides, PQ and PR, and leaves out the hypotenuse QR completely. "28" comes from finding QR incorrectly as 6 + 8 = 14 instead of using Pythagoras' theorem, then adding 6 + 8 + 14. "48" comes from multiplying the two shorter sides, 6 × 8, instead of finding and adding all three sides of the triangle.
- (c) £3.10 — Aisha's tickets cost 8 × 50p = £4.00. Her expected winnings are (8/400) × £45 = £0.90, since she holds 8 of the 400 tickets. Her expected loss is the cost minus the expected winnings: £4.00 − £0.90 = £3.10. Writing £4.00 is wrong because it is only the cost of her tickets, with no account taken of the expected winnings she might get back. Writing £0.90 is wrong because that is her expected WINNINGS, not her loss — the cost has not been subtracted. Writing £3.89 is wrong because it uses 1 ticket instead of her actual 8 tickets when working out the expected winnings: (1/400) × £45 = £0.1125, giving £4.00 − £0.11 = £3.89. Aisha should expect to lose £3.10.
- (b) 20 — Each length has its own error interval: 11.5 ≤ a < 12.5 and 6.5 ≤ b < 7.5. The upper bound of a sum is found by adding the upper bounds of both quantities: 12.5 + 7.5 = 20. Bounding only one of the two lengths and adding the other quantity's given value unbounded, 12.5 + 7 = 19.5, misses that both measurements carry their own uncertainty. Adding the lower bounds instead of the upper bounds, 11.5 + 6.5 = 18, gives the lower bound of the sum, not the upper one. Using a whole centimetre of error either side instead of half a centimetre, (12 + 1) + (7 + 1) = 21, comes from forgetting the error is half the rounding unit.
- (c) 25 — Method: read off a, b and c with their signs and substitute them into b² − 4ac. Working: for 2x² + 3x − 2 = 0, a = 2, b = 3 and c = −2, so b² − 4ac = 3² − 4 × 2 × (−2) = 9 − (−16) = 9 + 16 = 25. Answer: 25. The distractors: −7 comes from taking c as +2, which gives 9 − 16; 22 comes from working b² as 2 × 3 = 6 and then 6 + 16; 13 comes from leaving the 4 out of 4ac and working 9 − 2 × (−2).
- (b) litres per minute — The gradient of a tangent is the change in the quantity on the vertical axis divided by the change in the quantity on the horizontal axis, so its units come from both axes: litres on the vertical axis and minutes on the horizontal axis give litres per minute. Giving the units as minutes for each litre inverts the fraction, giving the units of the RECIPROCAL of the gradient, not the gradient itself. Writing just litres uses only the vertical axis's units and ignores that a gradient is a rate, not an amount. Writing just minutes uses only the horizontal axis's units. A gradient always combines both axes' units as one divided by the other.
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (d) x + y = 7 — The midpoint of AB is (−1 + 5)/2, (2 + 8)/2, which is (2, 5). The gradient of AB is (8 − 2)/(5 − (−1)) = 6/6 = 1. The perpendicular bisector has gradient −1 and passes through (2, 5): y − 5 = −(x − 2), which rearranges to x + y = 7. Distractor routes: x − y = −3 uses the gradient of AB itself, 1, rather than its negative reciprocal, giving a line PARALLEL to AB through the midpoint instead of perpendicular to it. x + y = 12 comes from adding the y-coordinates, 2 + 8 = 10, but forgetting to divide by 2, using the midpoint (2, 10) instead of (2, 5). x + y = 4 comes from using A's x-coordinate, −1, directly instead of averaging it with B's, giving the point (−1, 5) instead of the true midpoint (2, 5).
- (b) 5/7 — The enlargement multiplier is 1.4, which as a fraction is 7/5. To reverse an enlargement, use the reciprocal of the multiplier: flip 7/5 to get 5/7. 7/5 comes from using the enlargement multiplier again, instead of reversing it. 3/5 comes from treating the reverse as 'give back the extra amount', working out 1 − (1.4 − 1) = 0.6, instead of using the reciprocal. 5/2 comes from ignoring the whole number in 1.4 and inverting only the decimal part, 0.4, as if it were the whole multiplier.
- (d) 12 cm — Since DE is parallel to BC, triangle ADE is similar to triangle ABC (the two triangles share angle A, and the parallel lines make the angles at D and E equal to the angles at B and C). The whole side AB = AD + DB = 3 + 6 = 9 cm. The scale factor from the small triangle to the large triangle is AB ÷ AD = 9 ÷ 3 = 3, so BC = DE × 3 = 4 × 3 = 12 cm. Scaling by DB ÷ AD instead of AB ÷ AD gives 4 × (6 ÷ 3) = 8 cm. Adding DB directly onto DE, instead of scaling, gives 4 + 6 = 10 cm. Treating the triangles as congruent rather than similar, so assuming corresponding sides are simply equal, gives BC = DE = 4 cm.
- (b) 3/2 — Rearrange 2x + 3y = 6 into y = mx + c: 3y = −2x + 6, so y = −(2/3)x + 2. The gradient of this line is −2/3. The perpendicular gradient is the negative reciprocal: 3/2. Distractor routes: −1/2 comes from reading the gradient straight off the x-coefficient, 2, without dividing by the y-coefficient, 3, first, then taking its negative reciprocal. −3/2 correctly finds the gradient −2/3 but only takes its reciprocal without also changing the sign, giving −3/2 instead of 3/2. 2/3 comes from negating the gradient −2/3 to 2/3, but forgetting to also take the reciprocal.
- (a) y = 2ˣ — An exponential graph y = 2ˣ passes through (0, 1) since 2⁰ = 1, rises more and more steeply for positive x, and has the x-axis as an asymptote as x becomes very negative, since 2ˣ gets closer to 0 without ever reaching it. y = x² + 1 also passes through (0, 1) and also rises steeply for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it rises to infinity too, rather than settling towards the x-axis — mistaking any curve that gets steeper for an exponential misses this. y = x³ + 1 passes through (0, 1) and rises for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it falls towards negative infinity rather than approaching the x-axis from above. y = 1 − x² also passes through (0, 1), but it falls for large positive x rather than rising — a candidate who checks only the y-intercept, without reading the described shape of the curve, could pick this.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.