Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 2/5 — Method: find the number of vegetable plots in each allotment, add them, then divide by the total number of plots in both allotments. Working: Allotment A: 3/5 × 20 = 12 vegetable plots. Allotment B: 1/5 × 20 = 4 vegetable plots. Total vegetable plots = 12 + 4 = 16. Total plots = 20 + 20 = 40. Fraction = 16/40 = 2/5. Answer: 2/5. 3/10 comes from using only Allotment A's 12 vegetable plots over the combined total of 40 plots, forgetting to add Allotment B's vegetable plots. 1/5 comes from using only Allotment B's ratio (1:4) as the fraction of vegetables, ignoring Allotment A altogether. 3/5 comes from working out the fraction of the combined plots that grow flowers instead of vegetables.
- (d) Line 3 — Method: check each line of Chloe's working against the correct algebraic step. Working: Line 1 to Line 2 is correct, subtracting 2x from both sides gives 3x − 4 = 8. But Line 2 to Line 3 should add 4 to both sides, giving 3x = 12, not 3x = 4 — the constant −4 has been dropped rather than removed correctly. Line 4 follows correctly from Chloe's own, incorrect, Line 3. Answer: Line 3. Line 1 is simply the original equation, copied out correctly. Line 2 correctly subtracts 2x from both sides of Line 1. Line 4 divides Chloe's own Line 3 by 3 correctly — the arithmetic there is fine, the mistake happened one line earlier.
- (c) 7800 kg/m³ — Method: build the conversion factor from the two unit changes separately — one for the mass, one for the volume. Working: 1 kg = 1000 g, so the mass figure is divided by 1000; 1 m = 100 cm, so 1 m³ = 100 × 100 × 100 = 1000000 cm³ and the volume figure is multiplied by 1000000. The density figure is therefore multiplied by 1000000 ÷ 1000 = 1000, giving 7.8 × 1000 = 7800. So the density of the metal is 7800 kg/m³. Distractor 780 kg/m³ comes from multiplying by 100 instead of 1000. Distractor 78000 kg/m³ comes from multiplying by 10000, an extra zero. Distractor 7.8 kg/m³ comes from not converting the units at all.
- (a) 3 : 5 — Method: for similar figures the ratio of the areas is the square of the ratio of the lengths, so the length ratio is found by taking the square root of each part of the area ratio. Working: the areas are in the ratio 36 : 100, and taking square roots gives √36 : √100 = 6 : 10, which cancels to 3 : 5. Answer: 3 : 5. The distractors: 9 : 25 is 36 : 100 in its simplest form, so it is still the ratio of the areas and the square roots were never taken; 5 : 3 takes the roots correctly but writes the parts the wrong way round, giving DEF to ABC when ABC to DEF was asked for; 25 : 9 makes both mistakes at once, leaving the area ratio and reversing it.
- (d) 3/36 — Method: list the results as ordered pairs, decide which totals satisfy the condition, count the pairs that give those totals and divide by the number of pairs there are. Working: there are 6 × 6 = 36 equally likely ordered pairs. Greater than 10 means a total of 11 or a total of 12. A total of 11 comes from (5, 6) and (6, 5); a total of 12 comes from (6, 6) alone, because both dice must show a 6. That is 2 + 1 = 3 pairs out of the 36. Answer: the probability is 3/36. The distractors: 2/36 comes from counting the two ways of making 11 and forgetting that 12 is greater than 10 as well; 4/36 comes from writing (6, 6) down twice, applying the rule that a pair can be turned round to a double that can only happen one way; 33/36 comes from reading the condition the wrong way round and giving the probability that the total is 10 or less.
- (b) 120, unreliable — x = 25 is outside 1 to 12 — The line of best fit is y = 4x + 20. 4 × 25 = 100, and 100 + 20 = 120, so the estimate is y = 120. But x = 25 lies far outside the plotted range of 1 to 12 years, so this is an extrapolation, and the estimate is not reliable. Reaching 100 instead of 120 comes from 4 × 25 = 100 with the intercept of 20 left out — still correctly flagged as unreliable, but the wrong value. Calling the estimate reliable simply because it was calculated correctly, giving 120, wrongly assumes that a correct calculation is automatically trustworthy, ignoring that x = 25 lies far beyond the data actually collected. Reaching 68, from 4 × 12 = 48 and 48 + 20 = 68, substitutes x = 12, the top of the plotted range, instead of the assistant's actual x = 25, and wrongly calls that reliable because 12 lies inside the range.
- (a) 2.5 × 10⁷ — Method: place the decimal point so that the coefficient is at least 1 and less than 10, then count the places it has moved. Working: the digits give a coefficient of 2.5, and the decimal point travels from the end of 25,000,000 until it sits between the 2 and the 5, a move of 7 places. Answer: 2.5 × 10⁷. The distractors: 25 × 10⁶ is the same area but not in standard form, because the coefficient must be less than 10; 2.5 × 10⁸ comes from counting the eight digits of 25,000,000 instead of the seven places the decimal point moves; 2.5 × 10⁻⁷ comes from making the index negative because the decimal point was carried to the left.
- (c) −2 — Method: rearrange the equation into the form y = mx + c, then read off the gradient. Working: 3y = 12 − 6x, so dividing every term by 3 gives y = 4 − 2x, so the gradient is −2. Answer: the gradient is −2. 2 comes from dropping the negative sign after dividing by 3. 4 comes from using the y-intercept, 4, instead of the gradient. −6 comes from reading off the coefficient of x before dividing the whole equation by 3.
- (d) 24 — Method: split 60 into 3 + 7 = 10 equal parts, find the value of one part, then use the difference in ratio parts. Working: 60 ÷ 10 = 6, so the numbers are 3 × 6 = 18 and 7 × 6 = 42, and their difference is 42 − 18 = 24. Answer: 24. 4 comes from finding the difference between the ratio numbers, 7 − 3, but forgetting to multiply by the value of one part. 60 comes from adding the two numbers back together instead of subtracting, which just repeats the given sum. 80 comes from dividing 60 by the first ratio number, 3, instead of by the total number of parts, 10, giving a part value of 20 and a difference of 7 × 20 − 3 × 20 = 80.
- (c) 22.3 km — The bearing of E from D is 065°, so the bearing of D from E (the back bearing) is 065° + 180° = 245°. The bearing of F from E is 165°, so the angle at E between ED and EF is 245° − 165° = 80°. Using the cosine rule, DF² = DE² + EF² − 2 × DE × EF × cos(80°) = 14² + 20² − 2 × 14 × 20 × cos(80°) = 196 + 400 − 560 × cos(80°). Since cos(80°) ≈ 0.17365, 560 × cos(80°) ≈ 97.24, so DF² ≈ 596 − 97.24 = 498.76. Taking the square root, DF ≈ 22.333, which rounds to 22.3 km. 26.3 km comes from using 100° as the angle at E — the difference between the two given bearings taken directly (165° − 65°) without converting to the back bearing first. 498.8 km is DF² itself, rounded, with the square root never taken. 23.4 km comes from leaving out the factor of 2 in the cosine rule formula, computing DF² = 196 + 400 − 14 × 20 × cos(80°) ≈ 547.38 instead.
- (c) 100 — There are 3 even numbers on a fair dice (2, 4 and 6), so the probability of landing on an even number is 3/6 = 1/2, and 300 × 1/2 = 150. The probability of landing on a six is 1/6, so 300 × 1/6 = 50. The dice is expected to land on an even number 150 − 50 = 100 more times than on a six. Writing 50 is wrong because that is just the expected number of sixes on its own, without comparing it to the expected number of evens. Writing 150 is wrong because that is just the expected number of evens on its own, without subtracting the sixes. Writing 200 is wrong because it adds the two expected frequencies together (150 + 50 = 200) instead of finding the difference between them. The dice is expected to land on an even number 100 more times than on a six.
- (b) Chloe's estimate — √70 = 8.3666... to 4 decimal places. Comparing each estimate against this: Ben's 8.3 is 0.0666 away; Chloe's 8.4 is only 0.0334 away; Dan's 8.9 is 0.5334 away; Ella's 8.5 is 0.1334 away. Chloe's estimate is closest, because her method tests an actual calculation, 8.5² = 72.25, sees that it overshoots 70, and corrects slightly downward from it, rather than only comparing which perfect square is nearer. Ben's sharing-out is not a bad idea in itself — 70 sits 6 of the way along the 17 from 64 to 81, so 'about a third of the way' from 8 to 9 points at roughly 8.35 — but he then rounds that position down to 8.3, and it is that rounding, not the sharing-out, that leaves him twice as far from √70 as Chloe. Dan's claim that 81 is closer to 70 than 64 is is backwards: 70 − 64 = 6, while 81 − 70 = 11, so 64 is in fact the nearer square, which makes his estimate of 8.9 the furthest from the truth of all four. Ella's plain midpoint of 8 and 9 tests nothing at all: √70 does not sit halfway between 8 and 9, and her 8.5 lands further from √70 than Chloe's checked estimate does.
- (c) x + 2y = 6 — L has gradient 2, so the perpendicular gradient is −1/2. Substituting (4, 1) into y − 1 = −(1/2)(x − 4): y = −(1/2)x + 2 + 1 = −(1/2)x + 3, so 2y = −x + 6, giving x + 2y = 6. Distractor routes: x − 2y = 2 comes from using gradient +1/2 instead of −1/2, forgetting the negative sign the perpendicular rule needs. x + 2y = 9 comes from swapping the point's coordinates, substituting (1, 4) instead of (4, 1). x + 2y = −2 comes from a sign error distributing the negative gradient over the bracket, computing −(1/2)(x − 4) as −(1/2)x − 2 instead of −(1/2)x + 2.
- (d) 1:4 — Convert 1.4 l to millilitres: 1.4 l = 1400 ml. The ratio is 350 : 1400. Divide both parts by 350: 350 ÷ 350 = 1 and 1400 ÷ 350 = 4, giving 1 : 4. Misreading 1.4 l as 14 (moving the decimal point) gives 350 : 14, which simplifies to 25 : 1 — a very different, implausible ratio. Dividing by 175 instead of 350 gives 2 : 8, which still shares a common factor of 2, so it is not fully simplified. Swapping the order gives 4 : 1, litres to millilitres the wrong way round.
- (c) (1/3)a + (2/3)b — Method: OP = OA + AP, and since AP is twice PB, AP is 2/3 of the whole of AB, with AB = b − a. Working: OP = a + 2/3(b − a) = a − (2/3)a + (2/3)b = (1/3)a + (2/3)b. Answer: OP = (1/3)a + (2/3)b. Measuring 2/3 of AB from B's end instead of A's swaps the fractions round, giving (2/3)a + (1/3)b; adding (2/3)b onto the whole of a without first subtracting a inside the bracket gives a + (2/3)b; and treating the ratio as though AP and PB were equal gives the midpoint, (1/2)a + (1/2)b. Convert the ratio to a fraction of AB measured from the point named first in the ratio, subtract before you scale, and then add the result to OA.
- (a) y = −2x − 1 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both differences taken in the same order, and the constant then comes from substituting either point into y = mx + c. Working: m = (−9 − 3) ÷ (4 − (−2)) = (−12) ÷ 6 = −2, so the line is y = −2x + c; substituting (−2, 3) gives 3 = −2 × (−2) + c = 4 + c, so c = 3 − 4 = −1. Answer: y = −2x − 1. The distractors: y = −2x + 1 comes from rearranging 3 = 4 + c the wrong way round and taking the constant as 4 − 3; y = 2x + 7 comes from losing the minus sign when −12 is divided by 6 and then substituting correctly, 3 = 2 × (−2) + c; y = −(1/2)x + 2 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 6 ÷ (−12).
- (c) 10,800 kg — Method: since the model and the real container are similar and made of the same material, mass scales with volume, so the mass scale factor is the length scale factor cubed. Working: 30³ = 27,000, so the real container's mass is 400 × 27,000 = 10,800,000 g, which is 10,800,000 ÷ 1,000 = 10,800 kg. Answer: 10,800 kg. 12 kg comes from using the length scale factor directly, 400 × 30 = 12,000 g, without cubing it. 360 kg comes from squaring the length scale factor instead of cubing it, 400 × 30² = 360,000 g. 10,800,000 kg comes from correctly cubing the scale factor but then forgetting to convert the mass from grams into kilograms.
- (b) (1, 6) — Method: when a square is set square-on to the grid, so that its sides run parallel to the axes, each vertex shares its x-coordinate with one neighbour and its y-coordinate with the other, and the missing vertex then borrows one coordinate from each of the two vertices it is joined to; so the first job is to check from the given points that the sides really do run parallel to the axes. Working: A(1, 2) and B(5, 2) share y = 2, so AB is a horizontal side; B(5, 2) and C(5, 6) share x = 5, so BC is a vertical side, which confirms that this square lies square-on to the axes and that the rule may be used. In square ABCD the vertex D is joined to C and to A. DC must be horizontal like AB, so D takes the y-coordinate of C, which is 6; DA must be vertical like CB, so D takes the x-coordinate of A, which is 1. D is therefore (1, 6), and checking confirms every side is 4 long. Answer: (1, 6). The distractors: (1, 5) comes from lifting the first number out of each of A and C, pairing the x-coordinate of A with the x-coordinate of C; (6, 1) comes from finding the right two numbers but writing them the wrong way round, height before sideways position; (9, 6) comes from stepping a further 4 to the right from C instead of closing the square back to the column A stands in.
- (d) (x − 8)(x + 8) — x² − 64 = x² − 8², a difference of two squares, which factorises as (x − 8)(x + 8). A candidate who treats it as a perfect square with a repeated negative factor gets (x − 8)(x − 8), which expands to x² − 16x + 64 — wrong on both the middle and constant terms. A candidate who uses a repeated positive factor gets (x + 8)(x + 8), which expands to x² + 16x + 64. A candidate who picks a different factor pair of 64, such as 4 and 16, without checking that the middle term cancels, gets (x − 4)(x + 16), which expands to x² + 12x − 64 — the wrong middle term.
- (a) (−6, −3) — Reflecting in the y-axis changes the sign of the x-coordinate and keeps the y-coordinate the same: (−6, −3). (6, 3) comes from reflecting in the x-axis instead, which changes the sign of the y-coordinate. (−6, 3) comes from reflecting in both axes. (6, −3) comes from not applying the reflection at all.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.