Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) x⁽¹⁄²⁾ — Method: dividing two powers of the same letter subtracts the index of the divisor from the index of the term being divided, and fractional indices are subtracted like any other fractions. Working: 3/4 − 1/4 = 2/4, which simplifies to 1/2, so the result is x⁽¹⁄²⁾. Answer: x⁽¹⁄²⁾. The distractors: x comes from adding the indices, 3/4 + 1/4 = 1, as though the powers were being multiplied; x³ comes from dividing the indices, so that 3/4 divided by 1/4 gives 3; x⁽³⁄¹⁶⁾ comes from multiplying the indices, 3/4 × 1/4.
- (d) 9 — Method: expand the brackets fully first, then collect the x-terms and constants before dividing. Working: 4(x − 3) = 4x − 12, so 4x − 12 = 2x + 6; 4x − 2x = 6 + 12; 2x = 18; x = 9. Answer: x = 9. 4.5 comes from expanding only the x-term in the bracket and forgetting to multiply the 3, giving 4x − 3 = 2x + 6, then 2x = 9, x = 4.5. −3 comes from a sign error when expanding, giving 4x + 12 = 2x + 6, then 2x = −6, x = −3. 3 comes from a sign error collecting the x-terms, adding instead of subtracting: 4x + 2x = 6 + 12, so 6x = 18, x = 3.
- (b) 2.5 hours — Method: when two objects move in opposite directions the gap between them grows at the sum of their speeds, so divide the required gap by that combined rate. Working: 80 + 60 = 140 km of gap each hour, and 350 ÷ 140 = 2.5. Answer: 2.5 hours. The distractors: 17.5 hours comes from subtracting the speeds, 80 − 60 = 20, which is the rate for two cars travelling in the same direction; 5 hours comes from using the mean of the two speeds, 70 km/h, instead of their sum; 4.375 hours comes from dividing 350 by 80 and ignoring the second car altogether.
- (c) 0.5 — The real distance is 2 × 25000 = 50000 cm. Converting to metres, by dividing by 100, gives 500 m, and converting to kilometres, by dividing by 1000, gives 0.5 km. A candidate who divides the 50000 cm by 1000 in one go, applying the metres-to-kilometres factor straight to the centimetres, gets 50 km. A candidate who divides by 100 twice, treating 100 m as 1 km, gets 5 km. A candidate who slips one extra decimal place when converting 500 m to kilometres gets 0.05 km. The real distance is 0.5 km.
- (b) 8/35 — Method: the pupil picked is known to play at least one of the two sports, so first count how many pupils that is, then divide the number who play both by it. Working: 25 play football and 18 play tennis, but the 8 who play both have been counted in each figure, so the number who play at least one sport is 25 + 18 minus 8, which is 35. The pupils who play both give 8/35, which will not cancel. Answer: the probability is 8/35. The distractors: 2/15 is 8/60, dividing by the whole year group instead of by the 35 pupils who play at least one sport; 8/43 uses 25 + 18 as the denominator, forgetting that the 8 pupils who play both have been counted twice; 8/25 conditions on the footballers alone, answering the probability that a footballer also plays tennis rather than using every pupil who plays a sport.
- (c) Yes — with an estimate of 320, above the 250 limit. — Method: scale the sample proportion up to the whole batch to get an estimate, then compare that estimate with the 250 limit to reach a decision. Working: in the sample, 4 out of 50 boards are faulty, a proportion of 4 ÷ 50 = 0.08. Applying that proportion to the batch of 4,000 gives an estimate of 0.08 × 4000 = 320 faulty boards. Since 320 is more than 250, the factory should scrap the batch. Inverting the proportion, 50 ÷ 4 = 12.5, and treating that as a percentage of the batch, 12.5% × 4000 = 500, still gives 'yes' but from the wrong fraction, so it overstates the estimate. Comparing the raw number of faulty boards found in the sample, 4, directly with the 250 limit skips the scaling up to the batch altogether, and 4 is nowhere near 250, so that route wrongly says 'no'. Dividing the batch by the sample size, 4000 ÷ 50 = 80, finds how many samples of 50 fit into the batch but stops before multiplying by the 4 faulty boards found, so it also wrongly says 'no'. Always find the proportion in the sample first, scale it up to the whole batch, and only then compare the estimate with the limit given.
- (a) 3.84 × 10⁵ — 384,000 = 3.84 × 100,000 = 3.84 × 10⁵, with the decimal point moved five places and the coefficient kept between 1 and 10. Moving the point six places instead of five gives 3.84 × 10⁶, ten times too large. Leaving the coefficient as 38.4 gives 38.4 × 10⁴, which is not between 1 and 10. Using a negative exponent instead of a positive one gives 3.84 × 10⁻⁵, a number far smaller than 1.
- (a) x = 3.5 — Method: clear the fractions by multiplying both sides by 15, expand both brackets, then collect the x terms on one side and the numbers on the other. Working: multiplying both sides by 15 gives 3(3x + 2) = 5(x + 4), which expands to 9x + 6 = 5x + 20; subtracting 5x and 6 from both sides gives 4x = 14, and dividing both sides by 4 gives x = 3.5. Answer: x = 3.5. The distractors: x = 1 comes from collecting the x terms by adding the 5x instead of subtracting it, giving 9x + 5x = 20 − 6 and so 14x = 14; x = 4.5 comes from expanding 3(3x + 2) as 9x + 2, multiplying only the x term by the 3, which leads to 4x = 18; x = 10 comes from reaching 4x = 14 correctly and then subtracting 4 instead of dividing by 4.
- (d) 12 hours — Since time is inversely proportional to the number of installers, T = k/n. Using n = 4, T = 18: 18 = k ÷ 4, so k = 18 × 4 = 72. The equation is T = 72/n. When n = 6: T = 72 ÷ 6 = 12. Using the original number of installers instead of the new one gives T = 72 ÷ 4 = 18, the wrong value substituted. Treating more installers as needing more time, as if T were directly proportional to n, gives k = 18 ÷ 4 = 4.5 and then T = 4.5 × 6 = 27, the opposite relationship to the one described. Stopping at k = 72 and reporting it gives the time the job would take a single installer working alone — the constant still has to be divided by the new number of installers before it answers the question asked. With 6 installers, the job takes 12 hours.
- (d) 118° — In an isosceles trapezium, the two angles next to the same parallel side are equal, because the sloping sides are equal in length. So the angle at the other end of the shorter parallel side also equals 118°.
- (c) No — 7/30 is the relative frequency; theory stays 1/6. — The theoretical probability of rolling a 6 on an ordinary dice is fixed at 1/6, worked out from the number of equally likely outcomes, and does not change however the dice is actually rolled. The relative frequency from this trial is 7/30, found from what happened in these particular 30 rolls. Since 7/30 and 1/6 are different numbers, the correct statement is 'No — 7/30 is the relative frequency; theory stays 1/6.' Assuming the two values must always match because they describe the same event gives 'Yes — relative frequency always equals theory.' Believing that an observed result redefines the theoretical probability gives 'Yes — the theoretical probability has now become 7/30.' Refusing to work out either value at all gives 'Neither can be found — 30 rolls is too few to tell', which ignores that both numbers CAN be calculated from the information given.
- (d) £4.80 — Method: find the error interval, then check which value falls outside it. Working: half of 20p is 10p, so the actual cost, c, satisfies £4.50 ≤ c < £4.70. £4.80 is above £4.70, so it could not be the actual cost. Answer: £4.80. (£4.50 is a genuine possible cost — it sits at the included lower boundary. £4.65 is a genuine possible cost, below the £4.70 upper boundary. £4.55 is a genuine possible cost, well inside the interval.)
- (b) 1 at x = 90° — The graph of y = sin x rises from (0°, 0) to its maximum value of 1 at x = 90°, a quarter of the way through the period. Thinking the maximum occurs where the graph crosses the y-axis, at the start of the curve, gives 1 at x = 0°, but sin 0° = 0, not the maximum. Thinking the maximum occurs halfway to x = 360°, rather than a quarter of the way, gives 1 at x = 180°, but sin 180° = 0, not the maximum. Swapping the roles of the maximum value and the x co-ordinate at which it occurs gives 90 at x = 1, but the maximum value of sin x is 1, not 90.
- (c) £840 — Method: find the total amount raised using the reverse percentage, then subtract the entry fees to find the donations. Working: £1,260 is 60% of the total, so the total is £1,260 ÷ 0.6, and subtracting the entry fees from this total leaves £840 raised through donations. Answer: £840. £2,100 comes from correctly finding the total amount raised but then forgetting to subtract the entry fees, giving the total instead of the donations alone. £504 comes from working out 40% of the entry fees themselves, £1,260 × 0.4 = £504, instead of first finding the total amount raised. £1,890 comes from treating £1,260 as 40% of the total instead of 60%, dividing by 0.4 to get a total of £3,150, and then subtracting the entry fees from that incorrect total.
- (a) 5 — Method: BC faces the 60° angle, so put the two algebraic sides into the cosine rule and solve the equation that results. By hand, cos 60° = 0.5. Working: 7² = x² + (x + 3)² − 2 × x × (x + 3) × 0.5, so 49 = x² + x² + 6x + 9 − x² − 3x = x² + 3x + 9. That rearranges to x² + 3x − 40 = 0, which factorises as (x + 8)(x − 5) = 0, giving x = −8 or x = 5. A length cannot be negative, so the negative root is rejected. Answer: x = 5. The distractors: 8 comes from expanding (x + 3)² as x² + 9, the error of assuming that squaring a bracket squares each term, which turns the equation into x² − 3x − 40 = 0; −8 is the negative root, kept by a candidate who solves the quadratic but never checks that x has to be a length; 37 comes from applying the cosine rule as though the 60° angle were at C facing AB, which gives x² = (x + 3)² + 49 − 7(x + 3) and a single linear solution.
- (a) 55 − 5n — The number of chairs decreases by 5 in each row after the first, so the common difference is d=−5, and the first term is a=50. The nth term is a+(n−1)d = 50+(n−1)(−5) = 50−5n+5 = 55−5n. A candidate who uses the common difference as the constant term instead of correctly finding 55, giving the constant as −5 instead, would write −5n−5. A candidate who uses the first term, 50, as the coefficient of n instead of the common difference, would write 50n−5. A candidate who does not multiply the common difference by n at all, treating the nth term as n+d instead of dn+c, would write n−5.
- (c) 2:3 — The white paint is 5 − 2 = 3 litres. The ratio of blue paint to white paint is 2 : 3, which has no common factor, so it is already in simplest form. Getting 2 : 5 compares the blue paint to the total amount of shade instead of to the white paint. Getting 3 : 2 has the two parts the wrong way round. Getting 5 : 3 uses the total amount of shade instead of the blue paint as the first part.
- (b) 2x + 2y = 180° — Method: use the fact that OA, OB and OC are all radii, so triangles OAC and OBC are each isosceles, and set up the angle sum of triangle ABC as a whole. Working: since OA = OC, triangle OAC is isosceles, so angle OAC = angle OCA = x. Since OB = OC, triangle OBC is isosceles, so angle OBC = angle OCB = y. The angle at A in triangle ABC is x, the angle at B is y, and the angle at C is angle OCA plus angle OCB, which is x + y. The three angles of triangle ABC sum to 180°, giving x + y + (x + y) = 180°, which is 2x + 2y = 180°. Answer: 2x + 2y = 180°. Dividing this by 2 gives x + y = 90°, and since angle ACB = x + y, this proves angle ACB = 90°: the point C was never restricted to any particular position on the circle, so the proof holds for every choice of C. Include ALL THREE angles of the triangle in the sum, do not use a quadrilateral's 360° total, and remember angle ACB is the SUM x + y, not x alone.
- (c) (0, 0) — A curve crosses the y-axis where x = 0. Substituting x = 0 into y = x³ − 4x gives y = 0³ − 4(0) = 0 − 0 = 0, so the curve crosses the y-axis at (0, 0). A candidate who reads off the coefficient of x as the y-intercept, instead of working out the constant term, might write (0, −4). A candidate who swaps the coordinates might write (4, 0). A candidate who takes the coefficient of x but drops its sign might write (0, 4).
- (b) £105 — The hourly charge is 25 × 3 = £75. Adding the call-out fee: £75 + £30 = £105. A candidate who forgets the call-out fee gives just the hourly charge, £75. A candidate who adds the call-out fee to the hourly rate before multiplying by the hours, (30 + 25) × 3, gets £165. A candidate who multiplies the call-out fee by the number of hours instead of the hourly rate, 30 × 3, gets £90.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.