⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 20% — Method: percentage increase = (increase ÷ original) × 100. Working: the increase is 54 − 45 = 9, and 9 ÷ 45 = 0.2, so the percentage increase is 0.2 × 100 = 20. Answer: 20%. The distractors: 9% comes from writing the actual increase as a percentage; 16.7% comes from dividing by the new value 54 instead of the original 45; 120% is the multiplier 1.2 written as a change rather than the change itself.
2. (b) 12/25 — List every outcome as an ordered pair (first dice, second dice) out of the 25 equally likely outcomes. The pairs with a difference of exactly 2 are (1, 3), (3, 1), (2, 4), (4, 2), (3, 5) and (5, 3), the pairs with a difference of 3 are (1, 4), (4, 1), (2, 5) and (5, 2), and the pairs with a difference of 4 are (1, 5) and (5, 1), giving 6 + 4 + 2 = 12 outcomes with a difference of at least 2, so the probability is 12/25. Choosing 13/25 comes from finding the probability that the two scores differ by LESS than 2 instead, using the remaining 13 outcomes, the opposite of what was asked. Choosing 10/25 comes from forgetting the two outcomes where the difference is 4, (1, 5) and (5, 1), and adding only the difference-2 and difference-3 outcomes, 6 + 4 = 10 out of 25. Choosing 6/25 comes from counting only the pairs with a difference of exactly 2, forgetting that differences of 3 and 4 also count as at least 2.
3. (b) £35 — Method: round each price to the nearest pound, then add the rounded prices. Working: £9.95 rounds to £10, £19.90 rounds to £20 and £4.99 rounds to £5, and £10 + £20 + £5 gives the estimate. Answer: £35. The distractors: £40 comes from rounding each price up to the nearest £10 rather than to the nearest pound, giving £10 + £20 + £10; £32 comes from cutting the pence off each price instead of rounding it, giving £9 + £19 + £4; £34.84 is the exact total, worked out in full when the question asks for an estimate.
4. (a) 3 squares — Method: the plan view shows only the floor positions that have at least one cube standing on them; height does not add extra squares to the plan. Working: the base row occupies three floor positions in a line. The two extra cubes stand on top of two of those same three positions, so they do not create any new floor position. Answer: 3 squares. The distractors: 5 squares comes from adding the total number of cubes used (3 + 2 = 5) instead of counting distinct floor positions. 2 squares comes from counting only the raised two-cube section and ignoring the single cube at the other end of the row. 4 squares comes from counting one of the shared positions twice.
5. (c) 52° — When two straight lines cross, the angles opposite each other at the crossing point are vertically opposite and are equal. Ray OQ is opposite ray OP and ray OS is opposite ray OR, so angle QOS is vertically opposite angle POR. Therefore angle QOS = 52°.
6. (c) y = x² — Method: test a candidate rule against every pair given, not just one — a rule that fits one pair and fails another is not the rule. Working: the outputs 1, 4, 9 rise by 3 and then by 5, so they are not going up in equal steps and the input is not simply multiplied by a fixed number; comparing each output with its own input gives 1 × 1 = 1, 2 × 2 = 4 and 3 × 3 = 9, and all three pairs fit. Answer: y = x². The distractors: y = 3x comes from fitting only the last pair, where 3 × 3 = 9, and reading that 3 as a multiplier; y = 3x − 2 comes from assuming a multiply-then-add rule and using the first step in the outputs, 4 − 1 = 3, as the multiplier — it fits the first two pairs and fails the third; y = 2x comes from fitting only the pair 2 and 4 and reading every output as double its input.
7. (c) w/6 — Method: a ÷ b is written as a fraction a/b, with the number being divided (w) on top. Working: w ÷ 6 = w/6. Answer: w/6. 6/w comes from writing the numbers the wrong way round, putting the 6 on top instead of w. 6w comes from reading the ÷ sign as ×, multiplying instead of dividing. w − 6 comes from reading ÷ as −, subtracting instead of dividing.
8. (c) y = 2 — Method: substituting Noah's value shows why it fails, and the equation is then solved by undoing the addition. Working: substituting y = 3 gives 3 + 10 = 13, which is not 12, so Noah's value is not a solution; subtracting 10 from both sides of y + 10 = 12 gives y = 2, and substituting back gives 2 + 10 = 12. Answer: y = 2. The distractors: y = 22 comes from adding 10 to both sides instead of subtracting it; y = −2 comes from carrying out the subtraction the wrong way round, 10 − 12 rather than 12 − 10; y = 12 comes from copying the right-hand side as the value of y and ignoring the 10 that is added to it.
9. (a) 5p + 7q — Tom's total spend combines like terms: (2p + 6q) + (3p + q) = 5p + 7q, adding the notebook terms (2p + 3p = 5p) and the pencil terms (6q + q = 7q) separately. Answering 12pq adds every coefficient together (2 + 6 + 3 + 1 = 12) and multiplies the letters, combining unlike terms as though notebooks and pencils were the same item. Answering 5p + 6q correctly combines the notebook terms but forgets to add Tuesday's extra pencil to the 6q. Answering 2p + 7q correctly combines the pencil terms but forgets to add Tuesday's 3 extra notebooks to the 2p. The total amount Tom has spent is 5p + 7q pence.
10. (a) x/5 — Read the decimal as a fraction first: 0.2 is 2 tenths, so the coefficient is 2/10. Dividing the numerator and the denominator by 2 cancels this to 1/5, and a coefficient of 1/5 in front of a letter is written x/5. Reading the digit 2 as 'a half' gives x/2; reading 0.2 as 1/20 gives x/20; dividing only the denominator by 2 leaves 2/5, which is the coefficient 0.4 and twice as large as it should be.
11. (c) 3 — Method: the index counts how many times the coefficient has been multiplied by 10, which is the number of places the decimal point moves from the end of the number to just after the first significant digit. Working: 2,000 = 2 × 1,000, and 1,000 = 10 × 10 × 10, which is three tens. Answer: 3. The distractors: 4 comes from counting the four digits of 2,000 rather than the three places the decimal point moves; 2 comes from copying the coefficient 2 into the index; −3 comes from making the index negative, which would describe a number smaller than 1 rather than two thousand.
12. (a) 4 : 15 — Convert to the same unit first: 1.5 kg = 1500 g, since 1 kg = 1000 g. This gives the ratio 400 : 1500. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 100, to get 4 : 15. Giving 40 : 150 divides by 10 only, which is not the highest common factor, so it is not fully simplified. Giving 15 : 4 swaps the order. Giving 4 : 1.5 has not converted 1.5 kg into grams, so the two parts are not measured in the same unit.