Worksheet: Geometry and measures

Answer key

1. (c) 1.5 — The area scale factor is the length scale factor squared, so if n is the length factor, n² = 2.25. Taking the positive square root gives n = 1.5 (check: 1.5² = 2.25). 2.25 is just the area factor restated, with no root taken. 1.125 comes from halving 2.25 instead of taking its square root. 5.0625 comes from squaring 2.25 instead of rooting it.
2. (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
3. (a) Square-based pyramid — A solid with one square base and four triangular faces meeting at a single apex above the base is a square-based pyramid. A triangular prism has two triangular faces and three rectangular faces, not a square base with four triangles, so that is a different solid. A cube has six square faces, and a cuboid has six rectangular faces — neither has any triangular faces at all. The solid described is a square-based pyramid.
4. (b) 22 — Method: add the two drawn lengths together first, then apply the scale to the total. Working: 3 cm + 2.5 cm = 5.5 cm; 5.5 cm × 4 = 22 m. A student who answers 10 has only converted one of the two sections (2.5 cm × 4) and forgotten the other. A student who answers 5.5 has added the two drawn lengths but forgotten to apply the scale at all. A student who answers 44 has doubled the correct answer, effectively applying the scale twice. Answer: 22 m.
5. (b) 8 : 27 — The heights are in the ratio 6 : 9, which simplifies to 2 : 3. For similar solids, volume scales with the cube of the length ratio, so the volume ratio is 2³ : 3³ = 8 : 27. 2 : 3 is only the simplified length ratio, without cubing. 4 : 9 comes from squaring instead of cubing — that's the rule for areas, not volumes. 27 : 8 has the correct cubed values but in the wrong order, giving the larger cone's volume first instead of the smaller.
6. (b) P, since OP = 5 and OQ = 6 — Using the distance formula, OP = √(3² + 4²) = √(9 + 16) = √25 = 5, and OQ = √(6² + 0²) = √36 = 6. Since 5 is less than 6, P is closer to the origin. Naming Q as closer, with OQ = 5 and OP = 6, has the two distances swapped around the wrong point. Naming P as closer but with OP = 6 and OQ = 5 also has the two values swapped, even though it names the right point. The distances are not equal, since 5 is not the same as 6, so P and Q are not equally distant from the origin.
7. (c) No — 50° is angle P, not between PQ and QR. — Method: 1/2ab sin C only gives the area when C is the angle between the two named sides. Working: PQ and QR meet at vertex Q, so the angle between them is angle PQR, not angle QPR (which is the angle at vertex P, between sides PQ and PR). Since angle QPR is not included between PQ and QR, the student's calculation 1/2 × 8 × 11 × sin 50° does not give the area of the triangle — the verdict is No. Claiming that any angle works with any two sides ignores that the formula is only true for the INCLUDED angle. Claiming the formula needs all three sides is a different, incorrect statement about the formula itself — Area = 1/2ab sin C is valid with exactly two sides and their included angle, when that angle is actually known.
8. (a) 25° — PA and PB are tangents from the same external point, so PA = PB and OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°. The four angles of the kite sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 50° = 130°. Triangle OAB is isosceles because OA = OB, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OAB = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. Using angle APB itself as the apex angle of triangle OAB instead of angle AOB gives (180° − 50°) ÷ 2 = 65°. Using a triangle's angle sum on the four-sided kite, and so counting only one of its two right angles, treats angle AOB as 180° − 90° − 50° = 40°, and halving what is then left of triangle OAB gives (180° − 40°) ÷ 2 = 70°. Finding angle AOB = 130° correctly but forgetting to halve for the isosceles base angle gives 180° − 130° = 50°. Halve that remaining angle, and 25° is what's left for angle OAB.
9. (a) (5, 4) — Method: find the vector from the centre to the point, multiply it by the scale factor, then add the result back to the centre. Working: the vector from (2, 4) to (8, 4) is (6, 0); multiplying by 1/2 gives (3, 0); adding this to the centre (2, 4) gives (5, 4). Options: (4, 2) comes from multiplying the original coordinates by 1/2 directly, ignoring the centre of enlargement; (14, 4) comes from using a scale factor of 2 instead of 1/2, giving (2, 4) + 2×(6, 0) = (14, 4); (8, 2) comes from halving only the y-coordinate and leaving the x-coordinate unchanged. Answer: (5, 4).
10. (c) −1.5 — Since n = k × m, dividing a number in n by the matching number in m gives k: k = −6 ÷ 4 = −1.5 (check with the bottom numbers: −9 ÷ 6 = −1.5, the same value, confirming n is a scalar multiple of m). 1.5 has the correct size but is missing the negative sign. −10 comes from subtracting the top numbers, −6 − 4, instead of dividing them. −24 comes from multiplying the top numbers, −6 × 4, instead of dividing them.
11. (a) 20 litres — Volume of water = length × width × depth of water = 40 × 25 × 20 = 20 000 cm³. Since 1000 cm³ = 1 litre, divide by 1000: 20 000 ÷ 1000 = 20 litres. A pupil who uses the full height of the tank, 30 cm, instead of the water depth, 20 cm, gets 40 × 25 × 30 = 30 000 cm³ = 30 litres. A pupil who forgets to convert cm³ to litres at all gives 20 000 litres. A pupil who divides by 1000 twice by mistake gets 20 000 ÷ 1000 ÷ 1000 = 0.02 litres. The correct volume of water is 20 litres.
12. (b) x = 5 — Every point on a vertical line has the same x-coordinate, so the equation of a vertical line through (5, 2) is x = 5. "y = 5" mixes up the coordinates, using the x-value of 5 to write a y-equation. "y = 2" is the equation of the horizontal line through (5, 2), not the vertical one. "x = 2" uses the correct letter but the wrong coordinate, the y-value of 2 instead of the x-value of 5.
13. (a) 3 cm² — Area scale factor = (linear scale factor)² = (1/4)² = 1/16. Area of T = 48 × 1/16 = 3 cm². (12 cm² comes from multiplying by the linear scale factor 1/4 directly, without squaring it; 24 cm² comes from taking the square root of the scale factor instead of squaring it; 768 cm² comes from squaring the reciprocal of the scale factor, 4, instead of the scale factor itself.)
14. (b) 113.04 cm² — Sector area is (angle ÷ 360) × π × radius², and radius means the RADIUS, not the diameter: here the diameter is 24 cm, so the radius is 12 cm. The fraction is 90 ÷ 360 = 1/4, and 12² = 144, so the area is 0.25 × 3.14 × 144 = 113.04 cm². Using the diameter itself as if it were the radius gives 0.25 × 3.14 × 576 = 452.16 cm². Using the arc-length formula, 2 × π × radius, instead of the area formula gives 0.25 × 2 × 3.14 × 12 = 18.84 cm². Using the radius instead of its square gives 0.25 × 3.14 × 12 = 9.42 cm².
15. (a) 245 m² — Method: for similar figures the ratio of the areas is the square of the ratio of the lengths, so multiply the smaller area by the square of the length scale factor. Working: the length scale factor is 7 ÷ 3, so the area scale factor is 49 ÷ 9, and the larger area is 45 × 49 ÷ 9 = 5 × 49 = 245. Answer: 245 m². The distractors: 105 m² comes from multiplying by the length scale factor 7 ÷ 3 instead of by its square, the commonest slip on this topic; 315 m² comes from multiplying by 7 and forgetting to divide by 3; 405 m² comes from multiplying by 3² = 9, squaring the wrong part of the ratio.