Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) $y = x^2 + 3$ — Method: a point lies on a curve only if substituting its x-coordinate into the equation gives back its y-coordinate, so read one or two points off curve B and test each equation. Working: curve B crosses the y-axis at (0, 3), and its lowest point is also (0, 3); substituting x = 0 into y = x² + 3 gives 0² + 3 = 3, which matches. Checking a second point: at x = 2 curve B is at y = 7, and 2² + 3 = 4 + 3 = 7, which matches as well. Answer: curve B has equation y = x² + 3. Distractor refutation: y = x² − 3 comes from reading the 3 as a move down instead of a move up; substituting x = 0 gives −3, so that curve would cross the y-axis three squares below the origin, while curve B crosses it three squares above. y = (x − 3)² comes from putting the 3 inside the brackets; substituting x = 0 gives (−3)² = 9, and that curve's lowest point is at (3, 0), three squares to the right along the x-axis, whereas curve B has its lowest point on the y-axis. y = x² + 3x comes from attaching the 3 to the x term instead of writing it on its own; substituting x = 0 gives 0² + 3 × 0 = 0, so that curve passes through the origin, and curve B does not pass through the origin.
- (c) 2(x + 4) ≡ 2x + 8 — 2(x + 4) ≡ 2x + 8 is an identity because expanding the bracket on the left gives exactly the right-hand side for every value of x — try any number and both sides match. 2(x + 4) = 20 is an equation: expanding gives 2x + 8 = 20, which is only true for the single value x = 6. 2(x + 4) = 2x + 4 is not true for any value of x at all: expanding the left side gives 2x + 8, which can never equal 2x + 4 since 8 ≠ 4. x + 4 = 2x is also an equation, true only for the single value x = 4. The identity is 2(x + 4) ≡ 2x + 8.
- (d) (4, 8) — The other endpoint is found from 2 × midpoint − known endpoint: x = 2 × (−1) − (−6) = −2 + 6 = 4, y = 2 × 5 − 2 = 10 − 2 = 8, giving (4, 8). (−3.5, 3.5) comes from averaging the given endpoint and the midpoint as if they were the two endpoints of a segment, instead of working backwards from the midpoint. (5, 3) comes from working out (−1 − (−6), 5 − 2) instead of doubling the midpoint before subtracting. (4, 5) comes from correctly finding the x-coordinate but copying the midpoint's y-coordinate of 5 instead of doubling it.
- (b) 9 — Add the two equations to eliminate y: (x + y) + (x − y) = 15 + 3, so 2x = 18, and x = 9 (then y = 15 − 9 = 6). A candidate who reports the value of y instead of x would give 6. A candidate who forgets to divide by 2 after adding would give 18. A candidate who simply subtracts the two totals (15 − 3) instead of adding the equations would give 12.
- (c) 5(x + y − 1) — Method: take out the highest common factor of all three terms and divide every term by it, the number term included. Working: the highest common factor of 5x, 5y and −5 is 5; dividing gives 5x ÷ 5 = x, 5y ÷ 5 = y and −5 ÷ 5 = −1, so the bracket holds x + y − 1. Answer: 5(x + y − 1), which multiplies back out to 5x + 5y − 5. The distractors: 5(x + y + 1) comes from dividing −5 by 5 and losing the minus sign; 5(x + y − 5) comes from dividing only the terms containing a letter by 5 and carrying the −5 into the bracket unchanged; 5(xy − 1) comes from collecting the unlike terms 5x and 5y as 5xy before factorising.
- (d) Isla is right, because 5 + 1 = 6 — Method: put the input through the machine yourself, then compare what comes out with the output claimed, and check that the reason given with the verdict is itself true. Working: the machine adds 1 to whatever is put in, so an input of 5 gives 5 + 1 = 6, which is exactly the output claimed. Answer: Isla is right, and the reason is that 5 + 1 = 6. The distractors: the statement that the machine adds 1 to its output describes a different machine — this one adds 1 to what goes in — so the verdict is right but the reason is false; 5 − 1 = 4 comes from running the machine backwards and subtracting instead of adding; 5 × 1 = 5 comes from reading ‘adds 1’ as ‘multiplies by 1’, which leaves the input unchanged.
- (d) 50/3 — Method: call the smaller number x, write the larger number in terms of x and use the total. Working: the larger number is 2x, so x + 2x = 50, that is 3x = 50 and x = 50/3. Answer: 50/3, since 50/3 added to 100/3 makes 50 and 100/3 is twice 50/3. The distractors: 100/3 is the larger of the two numbers rather than the smaller one asked for; 25 comes from halving 50 and treating the two numbers as equal; 24 comes from reading 'twice the smaller number' as 'two more than the smaller number' and solving x + (x + 2) = 50.
- (a) y = −3x − 5 — Gradient = (−8 − 4) ÷ (1 − (−3)) = −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Using the point (1, −8): −8 = −3(1) + c, so c = −5, giving y = −3x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the gradient, using m = 3 instead, would then solve −8 = 3(1) + c to get c = −11, writing y = 3x − 11. A candidate who makes a sign error isolating c, writing c = 5 instead of −5, would write y = −3x + 5. A candidate who mixes up both mistakes — keeping the correct gradient but the wrong, positive value of c from the flipped-gradient calculation — would write y = −3x + 11.
- (b) 60 km/h — Method: the gradient of a distance-time graph is the change in distance divided by the change in time, and for a journey at a steady rate that gradient is the speed. Working: the change in distance is 195 − 15 = 180 km and the change in time is 3 hours, so the gradient is 180 ÷ 3 = 60 km/h. Answer: 60 km/h. The distractors: 180 km/h comes from stopping at the change in distance and never dividing by the 3 hours; 195 km/h comes from reading the final marker as the rate instead of working with the change between the two markers; 3 km/h comes from quoting the time taken, which belongs on the bottom of the fraction, as though it were the value of the fraction itself.
- (c) y = 3x + 1 — Method: a line of known gradient m has equation y = mx + c, and c is found by substituting the coordinates of a point known to lie on it. Working: the gradient is 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 4 gives 4 = 3 × 1 + c, so c = 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: y = 3x + 1. The distractors: y = 3x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 3 − 4 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = x + 3 comes from swapping the two numbers over, putting the gradient 3 in the constant position and the x-coordinate 1 in front of x; y = 3x + 4 comes from using the y-coordinate 4 as the constant without substituting.
- (c) the fourth quadrant — Method: read the sign of each coordinate in turn, then count round the regions, which are numbered anticlockwise from the one where both coordinates are positive. Working: the x-coordinate 5 is positive, so A is to the right of the y-axis; the y-coordinate −3 is negative, so A is below the x-axis; right of the y-axis and below the x-axis is the fourth of the four regions. Answer: the fourth quadrant. The distractors: 'the first quadrant' comes from ignoring the minus sign on the y-coordinate and treating the point as (5, 3); 'the second quadrant' comes from writing the pair the wrong way round and locating (−3, 5) instead; 'the third quadrant' comes from assuming that any point with a negative coordinate belongs to the region where the minus signs are, without checking the other coordinate.
- (a) 38 — Method: substitute the position number into the rule and follow the order of operations, so the squaring is carried out before the 2 is added. Working: n = 6 gives 6² + 2; 6² means 6 × 6 = 36, and then 2 is added to 36. Answer: 38. The distractors: 14 comes from multiplying the position by 2 instead of squaring it, 6 × 2 + 2; 36 comes from squaring correctly and then forgetting to add the 2; 64 comes from adding the 2 first and squaring afterwards, (6 + 2)².
- (d) w ≤ 630 — 'No more than 630 kg' means the weight can be exactly 630 kg or anything less, so the correct inequality is w ≤ 630, using 'less than or equal to' to include the limit itself. Writing w < 630 excludes 630 kg itself, as though the limit could not be reached exactly. Writing w ≥ 630 reverses the direction, describing a minimum weight rather than a maximum. Writing w > 630 both reverses the direction and excludes the boundary value. The inequality describing the lift's weight limit is w ≤ 630.
- (a) False — 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12, not 8x − 3. — Expand the bracket by multiplying both terms by 4: 4 × 2x = 8x and 4 × (−3) = −12, so 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12, which is not 8x − 3 — the student is wrong. Saying 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 3 comes from multiplying only the 2x by 4 and copying the −3 across unchanged. Saying 4(2x − 3) = 2x − 12 comes from multiplying only the −3 by 4 and leaving 2x unmultiplied. Claiming it is true because both expressions are linear ignores that equivalence depends on the actual coefficients, not the type of expression.
- (c) 32 — The terms are 60, 53, 46, 39, 32 — each found by subtracting 7 from the term before, so the 5th term is 32. Subtracting 7 five times from the first term instead of four times, 60 − 7 × 5 = 25, treats the first term as if it came before the sequence starts. Adding 7 four times instead of subtracting, 60 + 7 × 4 = 88, uses the wrong operation. Stopping one term early gives the 4th term, 39.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.