Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Number worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the number statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Number worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- 1.Write these numbers in order, starting with the smallest: −1.4, 5/4, −6/5, 1.3, 0
- 2.The length of a pencil is 8.4 cm, correct to 1 decimal place. Using L for the length of the pencil in centimetres, write down the error interval for L.
- 3.Which statement about the number 51 is correct?
- 4.Work out an estimate for 588 ÷ 31, by rounding each number to 1 significant figure.
- 5.A cyclist rides at a steady speed of 8 metres per second. Work out this speed in kilometres per hour.
- 6.Put these three numbers in order of size, starting with the smallest: 3/8, 0.4, 0.35
- 7.Work out an estimate for 8,900 ÷ 29, by rounding each number to 1 significant figure.
- 8.Work out 2/5 + 1/4, giving your answer in its simplest form.
- 9.3/5 of a 5/6 litre bottle of juice is poured out. Work out the exact volume poured out, in litres.
- 10.Write 0.00072 in standard form.
- 11.Work out an estimate for 79.3 − 24.6, by rounding each number to the nearest whole number.
- 12.A jar of jam costs £2.35. Tom buys 3 jars. He says the total cost is more than £7. Work out the exact total cost, and state whether Tom's claim is correct.
- 13.Write down the symbol that makes this statement true: −9 ___ −4
- 14.Work out an estimate for 89 + 52, by rounding each number to the nearest 10.
- 15.Write 5,000,000 in standard form.
Answer key
- (d) −1.4, −6/5, 0, 5/4, 1.3 — Method: convert the fractions 5/4 and −6/5 to decimals so every number is written the same way, then compare all five decimals. Working: 5/4 = 1.25 and −6/5 = −1.2. Comparing −1.4, −1.2, 0, 1.25 and 1.3 in size gives the order −1.4, −1.2, 0, 1.25, 1.3. Answer: −1.4, −6/5, 0, 5/4, 1.3. −6/5, −1.4, 0, 5/4, 1.3 swaps the two negative numbers, treating −6/5 as more negative than −1.4 even though −1.2 is closer to zero than −1.4. 1.3, 5/4, 0, −6/5, −1.4 lists the numbers from largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest. −1.4, −6/5, 0, 1.3, 5/4 swaps 5/4 and 1.3, comparing the numerator 5 directly with 1.3 instead of converting 5/4 to the decimal 1.25 first.
- (a) 8.35 ≤ L < 8.45 — Method: a length rounded to 1 decimal place lies within half of 0.1 cm, that is 0.05 cm, of the value written down. The lower limit is included because it rounds up to that value, and the upper limit is excluded because it rounds up to the next value instead. Working: 8.4 − 0.05 = 8.35 and 8.4 + 0.05 = 8.45, so a length of 8.35 cm still rounds to 8.4 cm while a length of 8.45 cm rounds to 8.5 cm. Answer: 8.35 ≤ L < 8.45. The distractors: 8.3 ≤ L < 8.5 goes a whole 0.1 cm either side instead of half of it; 8.35 < L ≤ 8.45 has the two limits the wrong way round, excluding the length that does round to 8.4 cm and including the one that does not; 8.4 ≤ L < 8.5 is the interval for a length truncated to 1 decimal place, not one rounded to it.
- (d) 51 is not prime, because 51 = 3 × 17. — Check 51 for small prime factors: 51 ÷ 3 = 17, and both 3 and 17 are themselves prime, so 51 = 3 × 17 and 51 is not a prime number — it has factors other than 1 and itself. Checking only 2, 3 and 5 and concluding wrongly that none of them divide 51 misses that 3 does divide it exactly, so the claim that 51 is prime because it avoids 2, 3 and 5 is false. Assuming any odd number must be prime ignores that 51 = 3 × 17 is a counterexample — plenty of odd numbers are not prime. Misreading 51 as the even number 52 leads to the false claim that it is divisible by 2; 51 itself is odd, and 2 is not one of its factors. So 51 is not prime, because 51 = 3 × 17.
- (a) 20 — Method: round each number to 1 significant figure, then divide the rounded values. Working: 588 rounds to 600 (1 s.f.) and 31 rounds to 30 (1 s.f.). 600 ÷ 30 = 20. Answer: 20. 17 comes from cutting 588 down to 500, keeping the leading digit as it stands instead of rounding it up to 1 significant figure, 600, then dividing by the correctly rounded 30. 200 comes from misreading the rounded divisor 30 as 3, giving 600 ÷ 3 instead of 600 ÷ 30. 19 is the exact value of 588 ÷ 31 rounded to the nearest whole number, found without rounding the numbers first.
- (a) 28.8 km/h — A compound unit is converted one part at a time. There are 3600 seconds in an hour, so in one hour the cyclist travels 8 × 3600 = 28 800 metres. There are 1000 metres in a kilometre, so 28 800 m = 28 800 ÷ 1000 = 28.8 km/h. 28 800 km/h leaves the distance in metres, 0.48 km/h converts the seconds to minutes rather than to hours, and 2.22 km/h divides by 3.6 instead of multiplying.
- (a) 0.35, 3/8, 0.4 — Method: convert the fraction to a decimal so all three values can be compared directly. Working: 3/8 = 0.375, so the three values are 0.35, 0.375 and 0.4. In order from smallest to largest: 0.35, 3/8 (0.375), 0.4. Answer: 0.35, 3/8, 0.4. "3/8, 0.35, 0.4" comes from assuming a fraction must be smaller than any decimal, without converting it first. "0.4, 3/8, 0.35" comes from writing the numbers in reverse order. "0.35, 0.4, 3/8" comes from converting 3/8 by flipping it to 8/3, making it seem larger than both decimals.
- (a) 300 — Method: round each number to 1 significant figure, then divide the rounded values. Working: 8,900 rounds to 9,000 and 29 rounds to 30; cancelling a zero from each gives 900 ÷ 3. Answer: 300. The distractors: 450 comes from rounding 29 down to 20 instead of to the nearest ten, giving 9,000 ÷ 20; 3,000 comes from rounding 29 to 3 rather than to 30, a place-value slip that divides by a number ten times too small; 307 is the exact quotient rounded to the nearest whole number, worked out in full when the question asks for an estimate.
- (d) 13/20 — Method: write both fractions over a common denominator, then add the numerators. Working: 2/5 = 8/20 and 1/4 = 5/20, so 2/5 + 1/4 = 8/20 + 5/20 = 13/20, which is already in its simplest form. Answer: 13/20. 1/3 comes from adding the numerators and the denominators separately: (2+1)/(5+4) = 3/9 = 1/3. 13/40 comes from converting both fractions to twentieths correctly but then adding the denominators as well as the numerators: (8+5)/(20+20) = 13/40. 3/20 comes from adding the original numerators (2+1) but keeping them over the common denominator without converting them first: 3/20.
- (a) 1/2 — To find a fraction of an amount, multiply the fractions together: 3/5 × 5/6 = 15/30, which simplifies to 1/2 litre. Adding the fractions instead of multiplying them, using a common denominator of 30, gives 18/30 + 25/30 = 43/30, a value greater than the whole bottle. Dividing by 5/6 instead of multiplying by it, using its reciprocal 6/5, gives 3/5 × 6/5 = 18/25. Multiplying 5/6 by itself instead of by 3/5 gives 25/36.
- (a) 7.2 × 10⁻⁴ — 0.00072 = 7.2 × 10⁻⁴, moving the decimal point 4 places to the right to reach 7.2, so the exponent is negative. Writing 7.2 × 10⁴ uses a positive exponent, which would give a number far larger than 1, not a small decimal. Writing 7.2 × 10⁻⁵ moves the point one place too many. Writing 0.72 × 10⁻³ leaves the coefficient below 1, which standard form does not allow.
- (b) 54 — Method: round each number to the nearest whole number, then subtract the rounded values. Working: 79.3 rounds to 79 (nearest whole number) and 24.6 rounds to 25 (nearest whole number). 79 − 25 = 54. Answer: 54. 54.7 is the exact value of 79.3 − 24.6, found without rounding first, so it is not an estimate. 55 comes from rounding 24.6 down to 24 instead of up to the nearest whole number, 25, giving 79 − 24. 59 comes from rounding 24.6 to the nearest 10, 20, instead of to the nearest whole number, 25, giving 79 − 20.
- (c) £7.05 — Tom is correct — Method: multiply the cost of one jar by the number of jars, then compare the total to £7. Working: 3 × £2.35 = £7.05, and since £7.05 is more than £7, Tom's claim is correct. Answer: £7.05 — Tom is correct. "£7.05 — Tom is incorrect" comes from reaching the right total but reading the 05 after the point as making the amount less than £7. "£6.95 — Tom is incorrect" comes from working out 3 × 35p as 3 × 30p + 5p = 95p, multiplying only the tens digit, and adding it to 3 × £2 = £6. "£7.20 — Tom is correct" comes from rounding £2.35 up to £2.40 before multiplying: 3 × £2.40 = £7.20.
- (c) < — Method: compare the two negative numbers by their position on a number line, not by the size of the digit. Working: −9 is nine places to the left of zero and −4 is four places to the left of zero, so −9 is further from zero in the negative direction, which makes it the smaller number. Answer: −9 < −4, so the symbol is <. > comes from comparing 9 and 4 as if both numbers were positive, ignoring the negative signs. = comes from treating both numbers as equal simply because they are both negative. ≥ combines > (false) with = (also false).
- (d) 140 — Method: round each number to the nearest 10, then add the rounded values. Working: 89 rounds to 90 (nearest 10) and 52 rounds to 50 (nearest 10). 90 + 50 = 140. Answer: 140. 141 is the exact value of 89 + 52, found without rounding first, so it is not an estimate. 130 comes from rounding 89 down to 80 instead of up to the nearest 10, 90. 150 comes from rounding 52 up to 60 instead of down to the nearest 10, 50.
- (c) 5 × 10⁶ — Method: standard form is written as A × 10ⁿ, where A is at least 1 and less than 10 and n counts the places the decimal point moves. Working: the digits of 5,000,000 give a coefficient of A = 5, and the decimal point travels from the end of 5,000,000 until it sits just after the 5, a move of 6 places, so n = 6. Answer: 5 × 10⁶. The distractors: 50 × 10⁵ comes from stopping before the coefficient has been brought into range, and 50 is not less than 10, so it is not standard form; 5 × 10⁷ comes from counting the seven digits of 5,000,000 instead of the six places the decimal point moves; 5 × 10⁻⁶ comes from making the index negative because the decimal point was carried to the left, when a negative index belongs to a number smaller than 1.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.