Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) $y = x^2 - 2x - 3$ — Method: read the two x-intercepts (roots) from the graph, write the quadratic as the product of the corresponding factors, then expand. Working: the curve crosses the x-axis at x = −1 and x = 3, so the equation factorises as (x + 1)(x − 3), which expands to x² − 2x − 3. Answer: y = x² − 2x − 3. Distractor refutation: y = x² − x − 6 comes from misreading the left-hand crossing point as x = −2 instead of x = −1, giving factors (x + 2)(x − 3). y = x² − x − 2 comes from misreading the right-hand crossing point as x = 2 instead of x = 3, giving factors (x + 1)(x − 2). y = x² + 2x − 3 comes from writing the factors as (x − 1)(x + 3), swapping which root gets the plus sign and which gets the minus sign, giving the wrong sign on the x term.
- (c) 2.26 — Method: apply the formula repeatedly, keeping the whole display each time, and stop when two values in a row round to the same 2 decimal places; that shared rounded value is the solution to that accuracy. Working: x₁ = ∛(2 × 2 + 7) = ∛11 = 2.22398…; x₂ = ∛(2 × 2.22398… + 7) = ∛11.44796… = 2.25377…; x₃ = ∛11.50754… = 2.25767…; x₄ = ∛11.51534… = 2.25818…. Now x₃ and x₄ both round to 2.26, so the sequence has settled. Answer: 2.26. The distractors: 2.22 is x₁ rounded, quoted by a candidate who stops after one use of the formula; 2.25 is x₂ rounded, quoted by a candidate who stops as soon as two values look close instead of waiting until two consecutive values round to the same figure; 1.91 is ∛7, which comes from ignoring the 2x term and solving x³ = 7 instead.
- (c) 71 — Method: square x first, then multiply by 3, then subtract 4, following the order of operations. Working: x² = 5² = 25; 3 × 25 = 75; 75 − 4 = 71. Answer: 71. 221 comes from squaring (3x) as a whole first: (3 × 5)² = 225, then − 4 = 221, squaring the coefficient along with x. 75 comes from correctly working out 3x² but forgetting to subtract the 4. 3 comes from subtracting the 4 from x before squaring: (5 − 4)² × 3 = 3, doing the operations in the wrong order.
- (c) The sequence diverges, moving away from x = 3 — Starting from x₀ = 2.9: x₁ = 2.9² − 6 = 2.41, x₂ = 2.41² − 6 = −0.19, x₃ = (−0.19)² − 6 = −5.96, x₄ = (−5.96)² − 6 = 29.56 — the values swing away from 3 and grow rapidly, so the sequence diverges rather than settling anywhere. Choosing 'settles towards x = 3' assumes that starting close to a root is enough for a rearrangement to converge to it, which is not always true — this rearrangement changes values too steeply near x = 3 to stay there. Choosing 'settles towards x = −2' assumes a diverging sequence must eventually land on the other root; instead it runs away to increasingly large values. Choosing 'stays constant at 2.9' ignores that applying the formula changes the value at every step.
- (b) 9 — Subtract 14 from both sides: 4s ≤ 36. Divide both sides by 4: s ≤ 9, so the greatest number of tickets is 9. A candidate who forgets the £14 coach cost solves 4s ≤ 50, getting s ≤ 12.5, rounded down to 12. A candidate who adds the £14 instead of subtracting it solves 4s ≤ 64, getting s = 16. A candidate who miscalculates 50 − 14 as 32 solves 4s ≤ 32, getting s = 8.
- (a) k = 3 — Method: a solution of an equation makes both sides balance, so substitute it in and solve the equation in k that is left. Working: putting x = 3 gives 3² − (k + 1) × 3 + k = 0, that is 9 − 3k − 3 + k = 0, so 6 − 2k = 0 and k = 3; the equation is then x² − 4x + 3 = 0, whose solutions are 3 and 1. Answer: k = 3. The distractors: k = −3 comes from solving 6 − 2k = 0 as though it gave 2k = −6; k = 4 comes from expanding −3(k + 1) as −3k − 1, multiplying only the k by 3; k = 1.5 comes from working 3² as 3 × 2 = 6, which leaves 3 − 2k = 0.
- (b) 3 — At the limit, L = √(2L + 3). Squaring both sides: L² = 2L + 3, so L² − 2L − 3 = 0, which factorises as (L − 3)(L + 1) = 0, giving L = 3 or L = −1. Since the sequence of iterates stays positive throughout, the limit is L = 3. Taking the other, negative root without rejecting it gives −1. Treating the equation L = 2L + 3 as already linear, forgetting to square both sides first, gives −L = 3, so L = −3. A sign error when factorising, writing (L + 3)(L − 1) = 0 instead of (L − 3)(L + 1) = 0, gives L = 1.
- (a) 18 cm² — Method: substitute the width into the formula, applying the index to the letter before multiplying by the 2 in front of it. Working: x² = 3 × 3 = 9, and then A = 2 × 9 = 18, so the area is 18 cm². Answer: 18 cm². The distractors: 36 cm² comes from multiplying 2 by 3 first and squaring afterwards, giving (2 × 3)²; 12 cm² comes from doubling instead of squaring, so that x² is replaced by 2x and the calculation becomes 2 × 2 × 3; 6 cm² comes from working out 2 × 3 and never applying the index at all.
- (b) 3/2 — Rearrange 2x + 3y = 6 into y = mx + c: 3y = −2x + 6, so y = −(2/3)x + 2. The gradient of this line is −2/3. The perpendicular gradient is the negative reciprocal: 3/2. Distractor routes: −1/2 comes from reading the gradient straight off the x-coefficient, 2, without dividing by the y-coefficient, 3, first, then taking its negative reciprocal. −3/2 correctly finds the gradient −2/3 but only takes its reciprocal without also changing the sign, giving −3/2 instead of 3/2. 2/3 comes from negating the gradient −2/3 to 2/3, but forgetting to also take the reciprocal.
- (c) 5 — Method: substitute the value into the formula, work out the index first and the addition afterwards. Working: x² = (−2) × (−2) = 4, so y = 4 + 1 = 5. Answer: 5. The distractors: −3 comes from squaring only the 2 and keeping the minus sign outside the index, giving −4 + 1; 1 comes from adding the 1 to x before squaring, giving (−2 + 1)²; 4 comes from squaring correctly but stopping there and never adding the 1.
- (d) h = 2A / (a + b) — Method: undo the multiplication by 1/2 by multiplying both sides by 2, then undo the multiplication by (a + b) by dividing both sides by it. Working: A = (a + b)h / 2, so multiplying both sides by 2 gives 2A = (a + b)h, then dividing both sides by (a + b) gives h = 2A / (a + b). The value h = A / (a + b) comes from forgetting to multiply by 2 to clear the 1/2 first. The value h = 2A / a + b comes from dividing only by a and leaving b outside the fraction, instead of dividing by the whole bracket (a + b). The value h = (a + b) / (2A) comes from inverting the fraction.
- (b) 5 — From x + y = 7, x = 7 − y. Substituting into 3x + 2y = 16: 3(7 − y) + 2y = 16, so 21 − 3y + 2y = 16, giving 21 − y = 16, so y = 5 (then x = 2). A candidate who forgets to multiply the y-term inside the bracket by 3 would write 21 − y + 2y = 16, giving 21 + y = 16, so y = −5. A candidate who subtracts the two equations directly, (3x + 2y) − (x + y) = 16 − 7, gets 2x + y = 9, and if they wrongly treat this as giving y alone, ignoring the x term, they would answer 9. A candidate who reports the value of x instead of y would answer 2.
- (c) −6 — Method: substitute the value, work out the bracket first, then multiply what the bracket comes to by 2. Working: the bracket gives (−5) + 2 = −3, and multiplying by 2 gives 2 × (−3) = −6. Answer: −6. The distractors: −3 comes from working out the bracket correctly but stopping there and never multiplying by 2; −1 comes from multiplying the 2 inside the bracket by the 2 outside before adding, giving −5 + 4; −8 comes from multiplying only the x by 2 and leaving the 2 inside the bracket unchanged, giving −10 + 2.
- (b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
- (d) k < 4 — Method: the number of real solutions of ax² + bx + c = 0 is decided by the discriminant b² − 4ac, and two different real solutions need it to be greater than zero. Working: here a = 1, b = −4 and c = k, so b² − 4ac = 16 − 4k; the condition is 16 − 4k > 0, which gives 16 > 4k and then k < 4. Answer: k < 4; for example k = 3 gives x² − 4x + 3 = 0, whose solutions are 1 and 3. The distractors: k ≤ 4 comes from using b² − 4ac ≥ 0, which also allows the single repeated solution at k = 4; k > 4 comes from dividing −4k > −16 by −4 without reversing the inequality sign; k < 16 comes from leaving the factor 4 out of 4ac and solving 16 − k > 0.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.