Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) Student B's — narrower strips fit the curve more closely. — The trapezium rule replaces the curve with straight-line segments; the narrower each strip, the more closely its straight edge follows the curve, so Student B's estimate with 8 narrower strips is more likely to be closer to the true area. Reasoning from the number of arithmetic steps rather than from how well the straight lines fit the curve gives the wrong claim that Student A makes fewer rounding errors. Believing the trapezium rule is exact, rather than an estimate that improves with narrower strips, gives the wrong claim that the two are always the same. Believing wider strips smooth out the curve better, rather than following it less closely, gives the wrong claim in favour of Student A's wider strips.
- (b) 1 — First differences: 2, 4, 6, 8. Second differences: 2, 2, 2, a constant, confirming the sequence is quadratic. The coefficient of n² is half the constant second difference: 2 ÷ 2 = 1. Using the second difference itself as the coefficient, without halving it, gives 2. Halving twice, dividing the second difference by 4 instead of by 2, gives 0.5. Doubling the second difference instead of halving it, on the mistaken rule that the n² coefficient is twice the second difference, gives 2 × 2 = 4.
- (d) 28 cm — Method: rate = 12 cm ÷ 3 min = 4 cm per minute. Depth after 7 minutes = 4 × 7 = 28 cm. Distractor origins: 84 cm multiplies the given depth by 7 directly, without first finding the rate per minute (12 × 7 = 84); 24 cm simply doubles the given depth instead of scaling correctly by the ratio of times; 16 cm combines the numbers with subtraction and addition (12 − 3 + 7 = 16) instead of finding a rate.
- (a) False — 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12, not 8x − 3. — Expand the bracket by multiplying both terms by 4: 4 × 2x = 8x and 4 × (−3) = −12, so 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12, which is not 8x − 3 — the student is wrong. Saying 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 3 comes from multiplying only the 2x by 4 and copying the −3 across unchanged. Saying 4(2x − 3) = 2x − 12 comes from multiplying only the −3 by 4 and leaving 2x unmultiplied. Claiming it is true because both expressions are linear ignores that equivalence depends on the actual coefficients, not the type of expression.
- (b) 0.458 — x₁ = (0.4² + 3) ÷ 7 = 3.16 ÷ 7 = 0.4514 (unrounded, 0.451428...). x₂ = (x₁² + 3) ÷ 7 = (0.2038 + 3) ÷ 7 = 3.2038 ÷ 7 = 0.458 (3 d.p.). Choosing 0.632 divides only the 3 by 7 instead of dividing the whole sum x₁² + 3 by 7. Choosing 0.451 repeats the calculation for x₁ instead of moving on to x₂. Choosing 0.493 uses x₁ itself instead of x₁² inside the formula.
- (c) x = 3 and x = −5 — To factorise x² + 2x − 15, find two numbers that multiply to −15 and add to 2: these are 5 and −3, since 5 × (−3) = −15 and 5 + (−3) = 2. So x² + 2x − 15 = (x + 5)(x − 3). Setting each factor to zero gives x = −5 and x = 3. Choosing x = −3 and x = 5 comes from swapping the signs of the correct roots. Choosing x = 5 and x = 3 uses the right pair of numbers, 5 and 3, but forgets that one of them must be negative for the product to equal −15. Choosing x = −15 and x = 1 mistakes the constant term, −15, for one of the roots, and pairs it oddly with x = 1.
- (c) 4 years — The yearly multiplier is 1 − 0.12 = 0.88. After 1 year: 2400 × 0.88 = 2112. After 2 years: 2112 × 0.88 = 1858.56. After 3 years: 1858.56 × 0.88 = 1635.5328. After 4 years: 1635.5328 × 0.88 = 1439.27 (2 d.p.), which is the first value below £1,500 — so it takes 4 complete years. Stopping after 3 years, where the value is still £1,635.53, above £1,500, gives 3 years — wrong, because the threshold has not been crossed yet at that point. Continuing for one year longer than needed gives 5 years — wrong, because the value has already fallen below £1,500 by year 4, so year 5 overcounts. Multiplying by the percentage itself instead of by the multiplier — using 0.12 in place of 0.88 — gives 2400 × 0.12 = £288 after a single year, apparently below £1,500 straight away, so 1 year — wrong, because 12% is the part lost each year, and the part left is 88%, so the multiplier is 0.88.
- (d) k < 4 — Method: the number of real solutions of ax² + bx + c = 0 is decided by the discriminant b² − 4ac, and two different real solutions need it to be greater than zero. Working: here a = 1, b = −4 and c = k, so b² − 4ac = 16 − 4k; the condition is 16 − 4k > 0, which gives 16 > 4k and then k < 4. Answer: k < 4; for example k = 3 gives x² − 4x + 3 = 0, whose solutions are 1 and 3. The distractors: k ≤ 4 comes from using b² − 4ac ≥ 0, which also allows the single repeated solution at k = 4; k > 4 comes from dividing −4k > −16 by −4 without reversing the inequality sign; k < 16 comes from leaving the factor 4 out of 4ac and solving 16 − k > 0.
- (b) x = −4, y = −3 and x = 3, y = 4 — Substitute y = x + 1 into x² + y² = 25: x² + (x + 1)² = 25, which expands to x² + x² + 2x + 1 = 25, giving 2x² + 2x − 24 = 0, or x² + x − 12 = 0. Factorise: (x + 4)(x − 3) = 0, so x = −4 or x = 3. Using y = x + 1: when x = −4, y = −3; when x = 3, y = 4. Distractor routes: x = 4, y = 5 and x = −3, y = −2 comes from mis-factorising x² + x − 12 as (x − 4)(x + 3), reversing the sign of each root. x = −4, y = −3 alone stops after finding the first root of the quadratic and never goes back for the second pair. x = 12, y = 13 comes from misreading x² + y² = 25 as the linear equation x + y = 25 and solving that together with y = x + 1.
- (d) 2 — The gradient between two points on a line is the change in y divided by the change in x. Using (5, 2) and (0, −8): (2 − (−8)) ÷ (5 − 0) = 10 ÷ 5 = 2. Inverting the fraction, dividing the change in x by the change in y instead, gives 5 ÷ 10 = 0.5. Reversing the order of the x-values in the denominator, giving (2 − (−8)) ÷ (0 − 5) = 10 ÷ (−5), gives −2. Misreading the y-intercept as 8 instead of −8, giving (2 − 8) ÷ 5 = −6 ÷ 5, gives −1.2.
- (b) (2x + 1)/(x − 3) — Factorise both the numerator and the denominator before you cancel anything. The numerator 2x² + 7x + 3 factorises to (2x + 1)(x + 3), and the denominator x² − 9 is a difference of two squares, factorising to (x − 3)(x + 3). The (x + 3) factor is common to both, so it cancels, leaving (2x + 1)/(x − 3). Writing (2x + 1)/(x + 3) comes from factorising x² − 9 as (x + 3)² instead of (x − 3)(x + 3) — a difference of two squares always has one plus and one minus bracket. Writing (2x + 3)/(x − 3) comes from mis-factorising the numerator as (2x + 3)(x + 1) and then wrongly cancelling the (x + 1) against the denominator's (x + 3) as though they were the same bracket. Writing 2x + 1 comes from cancelling the (x + 3) factor correctly but then dropping the remaining (x − 3) on the denominator altogether.
- (a) k = 3 — Method: a solution of an equation makes both sides balance, so substitute it in and solve the equation in k that is left. Working: putting x = 3 gives 3² − (k + 1) × 3 + k = 0, that is 9 − 3k − 3 + k = 0, so 6 − 2k = 0 and k = 3; the equation is then x² − 4x + 3 = 0, whose solutions are 3 and 1. Answer: k = 3. The distractors: k = −3 comes from solving 6 − 2k = 0 as though it gave 2k = −6; k = 4 comes from expanding −3(k + 1) as −3k − 1, multiplying only the k by 3; k = 1.5 comes from working 3² as 3 × 2 = 6, which leaves 3 − 2k = 0.
- (d) The cost increases by about £10 per extra item — Gradient = change in cost ÷ change in items = (800 − 400) ÷ (70 − 30) = 400 ÷ 40 = 10. The units of the gradient are £ per item, so the cost is increasing by about £10 for every extra item produced, near x = 50. Subtracting in the wrong order, (400 − 800) ÷ (70 − 30) = −10, gives the right size but the wrong sign — check which point comes first each time. Leaving out the division by 40 gives £400 per item; dividing the wrong way round, 40 ÷ 400 = 0.1, gives £0.10 per item.
- (d) V = lwh — V = lwh is a formula: it relates one quantity, the volume V, to others, the length, width and height, in a way that is true generally. A candidate who picks lwh has chosen the expression, not a full statement relating two quantities. A candidate who picks lwh = 60 has chosen an equation, since it is only true for particular values of l, w and h that multiply to 60. A candidate who picks 2(l + w) ≡ 2l + 2w has chosen an identity, mistaking the identity symbol ≡ for a sign that makes a statement a formula.
- (a) 3.5 km/h — Average speed is total distance ÷ total time. Total distance = 5 + 9 = 14 km. Total time, including the rest, = 1 + 1 + 2 = 4 hours. So average speed = 14 ÷ 4 = 3.5 km/h. Leaving out the 1 hour rest and dividing by only the 3 hours of walking gives 14 ÷ 3 = 4.67 km/h. Averaging the two separate speeds, 5 km/h and 4.5 km/h, instead of using total distance over total time, gives (5 + 4.5) ÷ 2 = 4.75 km/h. Dividing only the second leg's distance by the total time, 9 ÷ 4 = 2.25 km/h, ignores the first leg's distance.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.