Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Combinations of transformations and invariance worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions on "combinations of transformations and invariance" — DfE statement G8. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.
Higher onlyNon-calculator
Answer key: Combinations of transformations and invariance worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) (−14, 5) — To undo a composition, reverse the order and invert each transformation: undo the rotation first, then undo the translation. The inverse of 'rotate 90° clockwise about the origin' is 'rotate 90° anticlockwise about the origin', which maps (x, y) to (−y, x); applied to (3, 9) this gives (−9, 3). Then undo the translation by subtracting the vector (5, −2), i.e. adding (−5, 2): (−9 − 5, 3 + 2) = (−14, 5). Undoing the two inverse steps in the same order as the original composition, rather than reversing it, gives (−11, −2). Rotating 90° clockwise again instead of inverting the rotation's direction gives (4, −1). Adding the translation vector again instead of subtracting it, after correctly inverting the rotation, gives (−4, 1).
- (a) 90° clockwise about (0, 0) — Two reflections in lines through a common point compose to a single rotation about that point, through an angle equal to twice the angle between the two lines, in the direction from the first line to the second. The line y = x makes a 45° angle with the line y = 0, so the resulting rotation turns through 2 × 45° = 90°; testing the point (1, 0) — which reflects to (0, 1) in y = x, then to (0, −1) in y = 0 — shows the turn is clockwise, about the origin where the two lines cross. Taking the rotation anticlockwise instead reverses the direction the two reflections actually compose in. Using 45° directly, without doubling the angle between the lines, gives an angle equal to only half the true rotation. Treating any pair of reflecting lines as perpendicular, and so always giving a 180° rotation, ignores that these two lines actually meet at 45°, not 90°.
- (b) (12, 9) — Apply the transformations in the order given: first translate, then enlarge. Translating (3, 5) by the vector (1, −2) gives (3 + 1, 5 − 2) = (4, 3). Enlarging this by scale factor 3 about the origin multiplies both coordinates by 3: (4 × 3, 3 × 3) = (12, 9). Enlarging first and translating afterwards reverses the order and gives (3 × 3 + 1, 5 × 3 − 2) = (10, 13), a different point because the two transformations do not commute. Enlarging the original point by scale factor 3 while forgetting to translate it at all gives (3 × 3, 5 × 3) = (9, 15). Reversing the signs of the translation vector before applying it gives (3 − 1, 5 + 2) = (2, 7), which then enlarges to (2 × 3, 7 × 3) = (6, 21).
- (c) Translation by the vector (8, 0) — Method: reflecting twice in two parallel vertical lines is always equivalent to a single translation, at right angles to the lines, of twice the distance between them. Working: the two lines are 5 − 1 = 4 units apart, so the translation is 2 × 4 = 8 units in the positive x-direction. Answer: translation by the vector (8, 0). Using just the gap itself, without doubling it, gives (4, 0); translating in the negative x-direction, from the second line back towards the first, gives (−8, 0); and describing the combination as a single reflection in the line halfway between them, x = 3, confuses this combination with the effect of a single reflection — two reflections in parallel lines are always equivalent to a translation, never to another reflection. Always double the gap between the lines, and translate in the direction from the first line towards the second.
- (b) (2, 3) — Applying A first: reflecting (2, 1) in the x-axis gives (2, −1). Applying B to that image: translating (2, −1) by (0, 4) gives (2, −1 + 4) = (2, 3). Applying the transformations in the opposite order — B first, then A — gives a different result: (2, 1) translates to (2, 5), which then reflects to (2, −5); this shows that the order genuinely matters here. Applying only A and stopping there, without the translation, gives (2, −1). Applying only B and stopping there, without the reflection, gives (2, 5). Do both transformations, in the order A then B, and the image of P is (2, 3).
- (b) (5, −3) — Method: rotate the point about the given centre first, then translate the image, in the stated order. Working: rotating (0, 2) by 180° about (2, 2) uses the rule (x, y) → (4 − x, 4 − y), since the centre doubles in each coordinate. This gives 4 − 0 = 4 and 4 − 2 = 2, so (0, 2) maps to (4, 2). Translating (4, 2) by the vector (1, −5) gives 4 + 1 = 5 and 2 − 5 = −3, so the final image is (5, −3). Answer: (5, −3). Rotate about the centre GIVEN in the question, (2, 2), not about the origin, and translate the rotated image afterwards, in that order: rotating about the wrong centre, swapping the order, or stopping after one step all give a different point.
- (b) −2 — The gradient of the original line is (6 − 2) ÷ (3 − 1) = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Reflecting in the x-axis sends every y-coordinate to its negative, which flips the sign of the gradient: the image line has gradient −2. Translating by (2, 0) is a horizontal shift, which does not change the line's steepness or direction at all, so the gradient stays at −2. Assuming the gradient is unaffected by the reflection gives 2, the original gradient carried straight through. Thinking a reflection in the x-axis turns a gradient into its positive reciprocal gives 1/2. Combining that same wrong idea with the sign flip from the reflection gives −1/2. Only the sign flips, from the reflection, and translating never changes a gradient at all, so the answer is −2.
- (d) (4, −2) — Method: apply the rotation to the point first, then reflect the rotated image, in the order stated. Working: rotating (4, 2) by 90° anticlockwise about the origin sends (x, y) to (−y, x), so (4, 2) becomes (−2, 4). Reflecting (−2, 4) in the line y = x swaps its coordinates, giving (4, −2). Answer: (4, −2). Rotate before you reflect, exactly as the question orders them: these two maps do not commute, so reflecting first, only rotating without swapping the coordinates afterwards, or forgetting to negate the coordinate when rotating anticlockwise all send you to a different point.
- (d) (9, −4) — Reflecting (1, 3) in the line x = 4 gives (2 × 4 − 1, 3) = (7, 3). Reflecting (7, 3) in the line y = 1 gives (7, 2 × 1 − 3) = (7, −1). Translating (7, −1) by the vector (2, −3) gives (7 + 2, −1 + (−3)) = (9, −4). Stopping after the two reflections and forgetting the translation gives (7, −1). Applying the translation's y-component with the wrong sign, adding 3 instead of subtracting it, gives (9, 2). Forgetting that the two reflections are centred on (4, 1) rather than the origin, and instead rotating (1, 3) by 180° about the origin to (−1, −3) before translating, gives (1, −6). Do all three steps in order, each one correctly, and the final image is (9, −4).
- (b) (0, 2) — Method: to rotate about a point that is not the origin, first subtract the centre's coordinates, apply the rotation rule to the shifted point, then add the centre's coordinates back on; only after that do you apply the translation, in the order the question states them. Working: shifting P relative to the centre gives (6 − 1, 4 − 2) = (5, 2); rotating 90° clockwise sends (x, y) to (y, −x), giving (2, −5); adding the centre back on gives (2 + 1, −5 + 2) = (3, −3); applying the translation (−3, 5) gives (3 − 3, −3 + 5) = (0, 2). Answer: (0, 2). Applying the translation BEFORE the rotation, reversing the order the question gives them in, gives (8, 0); stopping after the rotation and forgetting the translation altogether gives (3, −3); and rotating anticlockwise instead of clockwise, using (x, y) → (−y, x), gives (−4, 12). Always carry out the two transformations in the order stated — rotate about the given centre first, then translate — and check each step before moving to the next.
- (a) (4, −4) — A point is invariant under a reflection only if it lies exactly on the mirror line. The line y = −x consists of every point where the y-coordinate is the negative of the x-coordinate: (4, −4) satisfies this, since −4 = −(4), so it is invariant. (5, 5) lies on the line y = x, a different line altogether, not y = −x. (4, 4) has equal coordinates, but that alone does not put it on y = −x; it would need y = −4, not 4. (−4, −4) also has equal coordinates and lies on y = x, not y = −x — its coordinates would need opposite signs to sit on the given mirror line. Only a point whose coordinates are negatives of each other stays fixed under this reflection.
- (b) (3, −5) — Method: apply the rotation to the point first, then translate the image, in the order the question gives them. Working: rotating (4, 1) by 90° clockwise about the origin sends (x, y) to (y, −x), so (4, 1) becomes (1, −4). Translating (1, −4) by the vector (2, −1) gives 1 + 2 = 3 and −4 − 1 = −5, so the final image is (3, −5). Answer: (3, −5). Use the CLOCKWISE rule, (x, y) → (y, −x), not the anticlockwise one, and apply the rotation before the translation, exactly as the question states them: reversing the order or the direction of turn both land on a different point.
- (d) (0, −2) — To rotate (4, 2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1), first find its position relative to the centre: (4 − 1, 2 − 1) = (3, 1). A 90° clockwise rotation sends (a, b) to (b, −a), so (3, 1) becomes (1, −3); adding the centre back gives (1 + 1, 1 − 3) = (2, −2). Reflecting (2, −2) in the line x = 1 gives (2 × 1 − 2, −2) = (0, −2). Doing the two transformations in the opposite order, reflecting first and then rotating, gives a different result, (2, 4), which shows the order matters. Stopping after the rotation and forgetting the reflection gives (2, −2). Stopping after only reflecting P in x = 1 and forgetting the rotation entirely gives (−2, 2). Rotate first, then reflect, in that order, and the final image is (0, −2).
- (c) (2, 1) — A point that lies on both mirror lines is fixed by each reflection individually, and so is fixed by the combination of the two — it is the intersection point of l1 and l2 that is invariant. Substituting x = 2 into y = x − 1 gives y = 2 − 1 = 1, so the intersection point is (2, 1). Forgetting the '− 1' in l2's equation and using y = x instead gives (2, 2). Making a sign error and computing y = x − (−1) = x + 1 instead gives (2, 3). Solving for x from an assumed y = 0 instead of substituting the given x = 2 gives (1, 0). Substitute x = 2 into l2's equation correctly, and the invariant point is (2, 1).
- (c) (2, −3) — Method: apply the transformations in the order given, translation first, then reflection, to the point itself. Working: translating (5, 1) by the vector (−3, 2) moves the x-coordinate by −3 and the y-coordinate by 2, giving 5 − 3 = 2 and 1 + 2 = 3, so the image after the translation is (2, 3). Reflecting this point in the x-axis leaves the x-coordinate unchanged and reverses the sign of the y-coordinate, giving (2, −3). Answer: (2, −3). Do the two maps in the stated order and carry the point all the way through both of them: swapping the order, or stopping after the first map, lands you on a different point altogether.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.