Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Combinations of transformations and invariance worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions on "combinations of transformations and invariance" — DfE statement G8. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.
Higher only
Answer key: Combinations of transformations and invariance worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) Translation by the vector (0, 6) — Method: reflecting twice in two parallel horizontal lines is always equivalent to a single translation, at right angles to the lines, of twice the distance between them. Working: the two lines are 4 − 1 = 3 units apart, so the translation is 2 × 3 = 6 units in the positive y-direction. Answer: translation by the vector (0, 6). Using just the gap itself, without doubling it, gives (0, 3); translating in the negative y-direction, from the second line back towards the first, gives (0, −6); and describing the combination as a single reflection in the line halfway between them, y = 2.5, confuses this combination with the effect of a single reflection — two reflections in parallel lines are always equivalent to a translation, never to another reflection. Always double the gap between the lines, and translate in the direction from the first line towards the second.
- (d) (4, −2) — Method: apply the rotation to the point first, then reflect the rotated image, in the order stated. Working: rotating (4, 2) by 90° anticlockwise about the origin sends (x, y) to (−y, x), so (4, 2) becomes (−2, 4). Reflecting (−2, 4) in the line y = x swaps its coordinates, giving (4, −2). Answer: (4, −2). Rotate before you reflect, exactly as the question orders them: these two maps do not commute, so reflecting first, only rotating without swapping the coordinates afterwards, or forgetting to negate the coordinate when rotating anticlockwise all send you to a different point.
- (d) 2 — Method: a point is invariant under a reflection exactly when it lies on the mirror line, so check each vertex's coordinate against the line's equation. Working: the line of reflection is x = 3, so a vertex is invariant only if its x-coordinate equals 3. (3, 1) has x = 3, so it is invariant. (3, 5) has x = 3, so it is also invariant. (6, 1) has x = 6, so it is not invariant, since 6 is not equal to 3. Two of the three vertices are invariant. Answer: 2. Check EVERY vertex against the mirror line's equation rather than assuming a shape either keeps all its vertices fixed or none of them: a vertex is invariant only when it sits exactly on the line, and here two do and one does not.
- (a) 90° clockwise about (0, 0) — Two reflections in lines through a common point compose to a single rotation about that point, through an angle equal to twice the angle between the two lines, in the direction from the first line to the second. The line y = x makes a 45° angle with the line y = 0, so the resulting rotation turns through 2 × 45° = 90°; testing the point (1, 0) — which reflects to (0, 1) in y = x, then to (0, −1) in y = 0 — shows the turn is clockwise, about the origin where the two lines cross. Taking the rotation anticlockwise instead reverses the direction the two reflections actually compose in. Using 45° directly, without doubling the angle between the lines, gives an angle equal to only half the true rotation. Treating any pair of reflecting lines as perpendicular, and so always giving a 180° rotation, ignores that these two lines actually meet at 45°, not 90°.
- (b) (−2, −1) — Method: apply the reflection to the point first, then rotate the image about the given centre, in the order the question states them. Working: reflecting (3, 4) in the line y = 1 keeps x = 3 and puts the image as far below the line as the point is above it: 4 is 3 units above y = 1, so the image is 3 units below, at 1 − 3 = −2 (the same as 2 × 1 − 4 = −2). The reflected point is (3, −2). Rotating (3, −2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1): subtracting the centre gives 3 − 1 = 2 and −2 − 1 = −3, the clockwise rule swaps and negates these to give −3 and −2, and adding the centre back gives 1 + (−3) = −2 and 1 + (−2) = −1. The final image is (−2, −1). Answer: (−2, −1). Reflect before you rotate, exactly as the design process is described, and rotate about the CENTRE (1, 1) given in the question rather than the origin: either mistake, or reversing the two steps, sends the tile to a different point.
- (d) 24 cm²; same way round as T — An enlargement scales area by the square of the scale factor, whatever its sign: area factor = (−2)² = 4, so the image's area is 6 × 4 = 24 cm². A negative scale factor is equivalent to an enlargement by the positive scale factor together with a rotation of 180°, so it does not create a mirror image — it is still a direct transformation, and combining it with a further rotation cannot create one either, since rotations never change a shape's orientation. Using the scale factor itself rather than its square gives area 6 × 2 = 12 cm², which is too small. Believing that a negative scale factor reflects the shape gives 'a mirror image of T' alongside the correct area of 24 cm², and combining both mistakes gives 12 cm² together with 'a mirror image of T'.
- (d) (0, −2) — To rotate (4, 2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1), first find its position relative to the centre: (4 − 1, 2 − 1) = (3, 1). A 90° clockwise rotation sends (a, b) to (b, −a), so (3, 1) becomes (1, −3); adding the centre back gives (1 + 1, 1 − 3) = (2, −2). Reflecting (2, −2) in the line x = 1 gives (2 × 1 − 2, −2) = (0, −2). Doing the two transformations in the opposite order, reflecting first and then rotating, gives a different result, (2, 4), which shows the order matters. Stopping after the rotation and forgetting the reflection gives (2, −2). Stopping after only reflecting P in x = 1 and forgetting the rotation entirely gives (−2, 2). Rotate first, then reflect, in that order, and the final image is (0, −2).
- (b) −2 — The gradient of the original line is (6 − 2) ÷ (3 − 1) = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Reflecting in the x-axis sends every y-coordinate to its negative, which flips the sign of the gradient: the image line has gradient −2. Translating by (2, 0) is a horizontal shift, which does not change the line's steepness or direction at all, so the gradient stays at −2. Assuming the gradient is unaffected by the reflection gives 2, the original gradient carried straight through. Thinking a reflection in the x-axis turns a gradient into its positive reciprocal gives 1/2. Combining that same wrong idea with the sign flip from the reflection gives −1/2. Only the sign flips, from the reflection, and translating never changes a gradient at all, so the answer is −2.
- (c) (2, 1) — A point that lies on both mirror lines is fixed by each reflection individually, and so is fixed by the combination of the two — it is the intersection point of l1 and l2 that is invariant. Substituting x = 2 into y = x − 1 gives y = 2 − 1 = 1, so the intersection point is (2, 1). Forgetting the '− 1' in l2's equation and using y = x instead gives (2, 2). Making a sign error and computing y = x − (−1) = x + 1 instead gives (2, 3). Solving for x from an assumed y = 0 instead of substituting the given x = 2 gives (1, 0). Substitute x = 2 into l2's equation correctly, and the invariant point is (2, 1).
- (b) (2, 3) — Applying A first: reflecting (2, 1) in the x-axis gives (2, −1). Applying B to that image: translating (2, −1) by (0, 4) gives (2, −1 + 4) = (2, 3). Applying the transformations in the opposite order — B first, then A — gives a different result: (2, 1) translates to (2, 5), which then reflects to (2, −5); this shows that the order genuinely matters here. Applying only A and stopping there, without the translation, gives (2, −1). Applying only B and stopping there, without the reflection, gives (2, 5). Do both transformations, in the order A then B, and the image of P is (2, 3).
- (d) (9, −4) — Reflecting (1, 3) in the line x = 4 gives (2 × 4 − 1, 3) = (7, 3). Reflecting (7, 3) in the line y = 1 gives (7, 2 × 1 − 3) = (7, −1). Translating (7, −1) by the vector (2, −3) gives (7 + 2, −1 + (−3)) = (9, −4). Stopping after the two reflections and forgetting the translation gives (7, −1). Applying the translation's y-component with the wrong sign, adding 3 instead of subtracting it, gives (9, 2). Forgetting that the two reflections are centred on (4, 1) rather than the origin, and instead rotating (1, 3) by 180° about the origin to (−1, −3) before translating, gives (1, −6). Do all three steps in order, each one correctly, and the final image is (9, −4).
- (d) A translation by the vector (8, 0) — Method: two reflections in PARALLEL lines combine into a single translation, perpendicular to the lines, of size twice the distance between them; two reflections in lines that CROSS combine into a rotation instead, never a translation. Working: the lines x = 2 and x = 6 are parallel, a distance of 6 − 2 = 4 apart. Doubling this distance gives 2 × 4 = 8, and the translation runs in the direction from the first line towards the second, so the vector is (8, 0). Answer: a translation by the vector (8, 0). Double the distance between the lines rather than using it directly, keep the direction running from the FIRST line reflected to the SECOND, and remember that two reflections in lines that never meet can only give a translation, never a rotation.
- (a) A rotation of 180° about the origin — Method: composing two reflections in lines that cross is always a single rotation about the point where the lines meet, through twice the angle between them. Working: the x-axis and y-axis meet at the origin at an angle of 90°, so the combined transformation is a rotation about the origin through 2 × 90 = 180 degrees. Answer: a rotation of 180° about the origin. The rotation angle is TWICE the angle between the mirror lines, not the angle itself, and the centre is always where the two lines cross, not some other point, and the result of two reflections in intersecting lines is a rotation, never another reflection.
- (b) (12, 9) — Apply the transformations in the order given: first translate, then enlarge. Translating (3, 5) by the vector (1, −2) gives (3 + 1, 5 − 2) = (4, 3). Enlarging this by scale factor 3 about the origin multiplies both coordinates by 3: (4 × 3, 3 × 3) = (12, 9). Enlarging first and translating afterwards reverses the order and gives (3 × 3 + 1, 5 × 3 − 2) = (10, 13), a different point because the two transformations do not commute. Enlarging the original point by scale factor 3 while forgetting to translate it at all gives (3 × 3, 5 × 3) = (9, 15). Reversing the signs of the translation vector before applying it gives (3 − 1, 5 + 2) = (2, 7), which then enlarges to (2 × 3, 7 × 3) = (6, 21).
- (b) Rotate 180° about the origin, then translate by (6, 0). — Rotating 180° about the origin sends (x, y) to (−x, −y); applied to T's vertices (1, 1), (3, 1) and (1, 4) this gives (−1, −1), (−3, −1) and (−1, −4). Translating this image by the vector (6, 0) adds 6 to every x-coordinate, giving (5, −1), (3, −1) and (5, −4), which matches T′ exactly. Reflecting in the x-axis first changes the sign of the y-coordinate only, and translating that image by (6, 0) gives (7, −1), (9, −1) and (7, −4) — the wrong triangle. Using the correct rotation but translating by (4, 0) instead of (6, 0) gives (3, −1), (1, −1) and (3, −4), shifted 2 units too far left. Reflecting in the y-axis first changes the sign of the x-coordinate only, so translating that image by (6, 0) leaves every y-coordinate positive, giving (5, 1), (3, 1) and (5, 4) — the correct x-coordinates but the wrong sign throughout on y.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.