Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Combinations of transformations and invariance worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions on "combinations of transformations and invariance" — DfE statement G8. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.
Higher only
Answer key: Combinations of transformations and invariance worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) (2, −3) — Method: apply the transformations in the order given, translation first, then reflection, to the point itself. Working: translating (5, 1) by the vector (−3, 2) moves the x-coordinate by −3 and the y-coordinate by 2, giving 5 − 3 = 2 and 1 + 2 = 3, so the image after the translation is (2, 3). Reflecting this point in the x-axis leaves the x-coordinate unchanged and reverses the sign of the y-coordinate, giving (2, −3). Answer: (2, −3). Do the two maps in the stated order and carry the point all the way through both of them: swapping the order, or stopping after the first map, lands you on a different point altogether.
- (d) (−14, 5) — To undo a composition, reverse the order and invert each transformation: undo the rotation first, then undo the translation. The inverse of 'rotate 90° clockwise about the origin' is 'rotate 90° anticlockwise about the origin', which maps (x, y) to (−y, x); applied to (3, 9) this gives (−9, 3). Then undo the translation by subtracting the vector (5, −2), i.e. adding (−5, 2): (−9 − 5, 3 + 2) = (−14, 5). Undoing the two inverse steps in the same order as the original composition, rather than reversing it, gives (−11, −2). Rotating 90° clockwise again instead of inverting the rotation's direction gives (4, −1). Adding the translation vector again instead of subtracting it, after correctly inverting the rotation, gives (−4, 1).
- (b) −2 — The gradient of the original line is (6 − 2) ÷ (3 − 1) = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Reflecting in the x-axis sends every y-coordinate to its negative, which flips the sign of the gradient: the image line has gradient −2. Translating by (2, 0) is a horizontal shift, which does not change the line's steepness or direction at all, so the gradient stays at −2. Assuming the gradient is unaffected by the reflection gives 2, the original gradient carried straight through. Thinking a reflection in the x-axis turns a gradient into its positive reciprocal gives 1/2. Combining that same wrong idea with the sign flip from the reflection gives −1/2. Only the sign flips, from the reflection, and translating never changes a gradient at all, so the answer is −2.
- (c) (2, 1) — A point that lies on both mirror lines is fixed by each reflection individually, and so is fixed by the combination of the two — it is the intersection point of l1 and l2 that is invariant. Substituting x = 2 into y = x − 1 gives y = 2 − 1 = 1, so the intersection point is (2, 1). Forgetting the '− 1' in l2's equation and using y = x instead gives (2, 2). Making a sign error and computing y = x − (−1) = x + 1 instead gives (2, 3). Solving for x from an assumed y = 0 instead of substituting the given x = 2 gives (1, 0). Substitute x = 2 into l2's equation correctly, and the invariant point is (2, 1).
- (a) 310° — Method: give the two rotations opposite signs since they turn in opposite senses — clockwise positive, anticlockwise negative — combine them into a single signed turn, then convert that turn into an angle measured clockwise between 0° and 360°. Working: the first rotation is 200° clockwise, so +200. The second is 250° anticlockwise, so −250. Combined: 200 − 250 = −50, meaning the net effect is a 50° turn anticlockwise. Measured clockwise instead, that same turn is 360 − 50 = 310°. Answer: 310°. Give the two rotations opposite signs before combining them, and convert a negative (anticlockwise) result into a clockwise angle by subtracting it from 360°, not from 180°: taking 50° away from a half turn gives 130°, which is a different rotation altogether; adding the two sizes as if both were clockwise gives 450°, which reduces to 90°; and reporting the anticlockwise size without converting it gives 50°.
- (d) y = 2 — Two reflections in perpendicular lines that cross at a point combine to a 180° rotation about that point. The line x = 3 is vertical, so the second line must be horizontal, and it must pass through the centre of rotation (3, 2) — that line is y = 2. Taking the y-coordinate of the centre but writing it against the wrong letter gives y = 3. Assuming the second line must also be vertical, like the first one, and just swapping in the other coordinate gives x = 2. Reaching for the standard mirror line y = x without checking that it actually passes through (3, 2) gives y = x — it does not pass through that point at all. The line that is both perpendicular to x = 3 and through (3, 2) is y = 2.
- (b) (−2, −1) — Method: apply the reflection to the point first, then rotate the image about the given centre, in the order the question states them. Working: reflecting (3, 4) in the line y = 1 keeps x = 3 and puts the image as far below the line as the point is above it: 4 is 3 units above y = 1, so the image is 3 units below, at 1 − 3 = −2 (the same as 2 × 1 − 4 = −2). The reflected point is (3, −2). Rotating (3, −2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1): subtracting the centre gives 3 − 1 = 2 and −2 − 1 = −3, the clockwise rule swaps and negates these to give −3 and −2, and adding the centre back gives 1 + (−3) = −2 and 1 + (−2) = −1. The final image is (−2, −1). Answer: (−2, −1). Reflect before you rotate, exactly as the design process is described, and rotate about the CENTRE (1, 1) given in the question rather than the origin: either mistake, or reversing the two steps, sends the tile to a different point.
- (b) (12, 9) — Apply the transformations in the order given: first translate, then enlarge. Translating (3, 5) by the vector (1, −2) gives (3 + 1, 5 − 2) = (4, 3). Enlarging this by scale factor 3 about the origin multiplies both coordinates by 3: (4 × 3, 3 × 3) = (12, 9). Enlarging first and translating afterwards reverses the order and gives (3 × 3 + 1, 5 × 3 − 2) = (10, 13), a different point because the two transformations do not commute. Enlarging the original point by scale factor 3 while forgetting to translate it at all gives (3 × 3, 5 × 3) = (9, 15). Reversing the signs of the translation vector before applying it gives (3 − 1, 5 + 2) = (2, 7), which then enlarges to (2 × 3, 7 × 3) = (6, 21).
- (d) 24 cm²; same way round as T — An enlargement scales area by the square of the scale factor, whatever its sign: area factor = (−2)² = 4, so the image's area is 6 × 4 = 24 cm². A negative scale factor is equivalent to an enlargement by the positive scale factor together with a rotation of 180°, so it does not create a mirror image — it is still a direct transformation, and combining it with a further rotation cannot create one either, since rotations never change a shape's orientation. Using the scale factor itself rather than its square gives area 6 × 2 = 12 cm², which is too small. Believing that a negative scale factor reflects the shape gives 'a mirror image of T' alongside the correct area of 24 cm², and combining both mistakes gives 12 cm² together with 'a mirror image of T'.
- (d) 2 — Method: a point is invariant under a reflection exactly when it lies on the mirror line, so check each vertex's coordinate against the line's equation. Working: the line of reflection is x = 3, so a vertex is invariant only if its x-coordinate equals 3. (3, 1) has x = 3, so it is invariant. (3, 5) has x = 3, so it is also invariant. (6, 1) has x = 6, so it is not invariant, since 6 is not equal to 3. Two of the three vertices are invariant. Answer: 2. Check EVERY vertex against the mirror line's equation rather than assuming a shape either keeps all its vertices fixed or none of them: a vertex is invariant only when it sits exactly on the line, and here two do and one does not.
- (d) No transformation — every point stays exactly where it was — The two vectors (5, −3) and (−5, 3) are opposites, so adding them gives (0, 0): every point ends up exactly where it started, and there is no transformation at all. Misreading the second vector's signs and effectively adding (5, −3) to itself instead of to its opposite gives a translation by the vector (10, −6). Assuming two translations must combine into a reflection gives a reflection in the x-axis — but a reflection reverses orientation, and translations never do. Assuming that two opposite vectors must mean a half turn gives a rotation of 180° about the origin — but a 180° rotation moves every point except its own centre, whereas this pair of translations leaves every single point exactly where it was. Two translations by opposite vectors always cancel exactly, leaving every point unmoved.
- (b) Rotate 180° about the origin, then translate by (6, 0). — Rotating 180° about the origin sends (x, y) to (−x, −y); applied to T's vertices (1, 1), (3, 1) and (1, 4) this gives (−1, −1), (−3, −1) and (−1, −4). Translating this image by the vector (6, 0) adds 6 to every x-coordinate, giving (5, −1), (3, −1) and (5, −4), which matches T′ exactly. Reflecting in the x-axis first changes the sign of the y-coordinate only, and translating that image by (6, 0) gives (7, −1), (9, −1) and (7, −4) — the wrong triangle. Using the correct rotation but translating by (4, 0) instead of (6, 0) gives (3, −1), (1, −1) and (3, −4), shifted 2 units too far left. Reflecting in the y-axis first changes the sign of the x-coordinate only, so translating that image by (6, 0) leaves every y-coordinate positive, giving (5, 1), (3, 1) and (5, 4) — the correct x-coordinates but the wrong sign throughout on y.
- (b) (0, 2) — Method: to rotate about a point that is not the origin, first subtract the centre's coordinates, apply the rotation rule to the shifted point, then add the centre's coordinates back on; only after that do you apply the translation, in the order the question states them. Working: shifting P relative to the centre gives (6 − 1, 4 − 2) = (5, 2); rotating 90° clockwise sends (x, y) to (y, −x), giving (2, −5); adding the centre back on gives (2 + 1, −5 + 2) = (3, −3); applying the translation (−3, 5) gives (3 − 3, −3 + 5) = (0, 2). Answer: (0, 2). Applying the translation BEFORE the rotation, reversing the order the question gives them in, gives (8, 0); stopping after the rotation and forgetting the translation altogether gives (3, −3); and rotating anticlockwise instead of clockwise, using (x, y) → (−y, x), gives (−4, 12). Always carry out the two transformations in the order stated — rotate about the given centre first, then translate — and check each step before moving to the next.
- (d) (4, −2) — Method: apply the rotation to the point first, then reflect the rotated image, in the order stated. Working: rotating (4, 2) by 90° anticlockwise about the origin sends (x, y) to (−y, x), so (4, 2) becomes (−2, 4). Reflecting (−2, 4) in the line y = x swaps its coordinates, giving (4, −2). Answer: (4, −2). Rotate before you reflect, exactly as the question orders them: these two maps do not commute, so reflecting first, only rotating without swapping the coordinates afterwards, or forgetting to negate the coordinate when rotating anticlockwise all send you to a different point.
- (d) (0, −2) — To rotate (4, 2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1), first find its position relative to the centre: (4 − 1, 2 − 1) = (3, 1). A 90° clockwise rotation sends (a, b) to (b, −a), so (3, 1) becomes (1, −3); adding the centre back gives (1 + 1, 1 − 3) = (2, −2). Reflecting (2, −2) in the line x = 1 gives (2 × 1 − 2, −2) = (0, −2). Doing the two transformations in the opposite order, reflecting first and then rotating, gives a different result, (2, 4), which shows the order matters. Stopping after the rotation and forgetting the reflection gives (2, −2). Stopping after only reflecting P in x = 1 and forgetting the rotation entirely gives (−2, 2). Rotate first, then reflect, in that order, and the final image is (0, −2).
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.