Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Combinations of transformations and invariance worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions on "combinations of transformations and invariance" — DfE statement G8. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.
Higher only
Answer key: Combinations of transformations and invariance worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) (0, −2) — To rotate (4, 2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1), first find its position relative to the centre: (4 − 1, 2 − 1) = (3, 1). A 90° clockwise rotation sends (a, b) to (b, −a), so (3, 1) becomes (1, −3); adding the centre back gives (1 + 1, 1 − 3) = (2, −2). Reflecting (2, −2) in the line x = 1 gives (2 × 1 − 2, −2) = (0, −2). Doing the two transformations in the opposite order, reflecting first and then rotating, gives a different result, (2, 4), which shows the order matters. Stopping after the rotation and forgetting the reflection gives (2, −2). Stopping after only reflecting P in x = 1 and forgetting the rotation entirely gives (−2, 2). Rotate first, then reflect, in that order, and the final image is (0, −2).
- (d) (−1, 3) — Method: two 90° rotations about the SAME centre, applied one after another, combine into a single 180° rotation about that same centre: use the shortcut (x, y) → (2a − x, 2b − y) for a half-turn about (a, b). Working: with centre (2, 3), doubling each coordinate gives 2 × 2 = 4 and 2 × 3 = 6, so the rule is (x, y) → (4 − x, 6 − y). Applying it to (5, 3) gives 4 − 5 = −1 and 6 − 3 = 3, so the coin ends at (−1, 3). Answer: (−1, 3). Rotate about the centre (2, 3) stated in the game, not about the origin, and remember the button is pressed TWICE: stopping after one press, or rotating about the wrong centre, both leave the coin somewhere else.
- (b) Rotate 180° about the origin, then translate by (6, 0). — Rotating 180° about the origin sends (x, y) to (−x, −y); applied to T's vertices (1, 1), (3, 1) and (1, 4) this gives (−1, −1), (−3, −1) and (−1, −4). Translating this image by the vector (6, 0) adds 6 to every x-coordinate, giving (5, −1), (3, −1) and (5, −4), which matches T′ exactly. Reflecting in the x-axis first changes the sign of the y-coordinate only, and translating that image by (6, 0) gives (7, −1), (9, −1) and (7, −4) — the wrong triangle. Using the correct rotation but translating by (4, 0) instead of (6, 0) gives (3, −1), (1, −1) and (3, −4), shifted 2 units too far left. Reflecting in the y-axis first changes the sign of the x-coordinate only, so translating that image by (6, 0) leaves every y-coordinate positive, giving (5, 1), (3, 1) and (5, 4) — the correct x-coordinates but the wrong sign throughout on y.
- (b) (−2, −1) — Method: apply the reflection to the point first, then rotate the image about the given centre, in the order the question states them. Working: reflecting (3, 4) in the line y = 1 keeps x = 3 and puts the image as far below the line as the point is above it: 4 is 3 units above y = 1, so the image is 3 units below, at 1 − 3 = −2 (the same as 2 × 1 − 4 = −2). The reflected point is (3, −2). Rotating (3, −2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1): subtracting the centre gives 3 − 1 = 2 and −2 − 1 = −3, the clockwise rule swaps and negates these to give −3 and −2, and adding the centre back gives 1 + (−3) = −2 and 1 + (−2) = −1. The final image is (−2, −1). Answer: (−2, −1). Reflect before you rotate, exactly as the design process is described, and rotate about the CENTRE (1, 1) given in the question rather than the origin: either mistake, or reversing the two steps, sends the tile to a different point.
- (a) 310° — Method: give the two rotations opposite signs since they turn in opposite senses — clockwise positive, anticlockwise negative — combine them into a single signed turn, then convert that turn into an angle measured clockwise between 0° and 360°. Working: the first rotation is 200° clockwise, so +200. The second is 250° anticlockwise, so −250. Combined: 200 − 250 = −50, meaning the net effect is a 50° turn anticlockwise. Measured clockwise instead, that same turn is 360 − 50 = 310°. Answer: 310°. Give the two rotations opposite signs before combining them, and convert a negative (anticlockwise) result into a clockwise angle by subtracting it from 360°, not from 180°: taking 50° away from a half turn gives 130°, which is a different rotation altogether; adding the two sizes as if both were clockwise gives 450°, which reduces to 90°; and reporting the anticlockwise size without converting it gives 50°.
- (b) (0, 2) — Method: to rotate about a point that is not the origin, first subtract the centre's coordinates, apply the rotation rule to the shifted point, then add the centre's coordinates back on; only after that do you apply the translation, in the order the question states them. Working: shifting P relative to the centre gives (6 − 1, 4 − 2) = (5, 2); rotating 90° clockwise sends (x, y) to (y, −x), giving (2, −5); adding the centre back on gives (2 + 1, −5 + 2) = (3, −3); applying the translation (−3, 5) gives (3 − 3, −3 + 5) = (0, 2). Answer: (0, 2). Applying the translation BEFORE the rotation, reversing the order the question gives them in, gives (8, 0); stopping after the rotation and forgetting the translation altogether gives (3, −3); and rotating anticlockwise instead of clockwise, using (x, y) → (−y, x), gives (−4, 12). Always carry out the two transformations in the order stated — rotate about the given centre first, then translate — and check each step before moving to the next.
- (d) (4, −2) — Method: apply the rotation to the point first, then reflect the rotated image, in the order stated. Working: rotating (4, 2) by 90° anticlockwise about the origin sends (x, y) to (−y, x), so (4, 2) becomes (−2, 4). Reflecting (−2, 4) in the line y = x swaps its coordinates, giving (4, −2). Answer: (4, −2). Rotate before you reflect, exactly as the question orders them: these two maps do not commute, so reflecting first, only rotating without swapping the coordinates afterwards, or forgetting to negate the coordinate when rotating anticlockwise all send you to a different point.
- (c) Translation by the vector (8, 0) — Method: reflecting twice in two parallel vertical lines is always equivalent to a single translation, at right angles to the lines, of twice the distance between them. Working: the two lines are 5 − 1 = 4 units apart, so the translation is 2 × 4 = 8 units in the positive x-direction. Answer: translation by the vector (8, 0). Using just the gap itself, without doubling it, gives (4, 0); translating in the negative x-direction, from the second line back towards the first, gives (−8, 0); and describing the combination as a single reflection in the line halfway between them, x = 3, confuses this combination with the effect of a single reflection — two reflections in parallel lines are always equivalent to a translation, never to another reflection. Always double the gap between the lines, and translate in the direction from the first line towards the second.
- (b) (12, 9) — Apply the transformations in the order given: first translate, then enlarge. Translating (3, 5) by the vector (1, −2) gives (3 + 1, 5 − 2) = (4, 3). Enlarging this by scale factor 3 about the origin multiplies both coordinates by 3: (4 × 3, 3 × 3) = (12, 9). Enlarging first and translating afterwards reverses the order and gives (3 × 3 + 1, 5 × 3 − 2) = (10, 13), a different point because the two transformations do not commute. Enlarging the original point by scale factor 3 while forgetting to translate it at all gives (3 × 3, 5 × 3) = (9, 15). Reversing the signs of the translation vector before applying it gives (3 − 1, 5 + 2) = (2, 7), which then enlarges to (2 × 3, 7 × 3) = (6, 21).
- (d) 2 — Method: a point is invariant under a reflection exactly when it lies on the mirror line, so check each vertex's coordinate against the line's equation. Working: the line of reflection is x = 3, so a vertex is invariant only if its x-coordinate equals 3. (3, 1) has x = 3, so it is invariant. (3, 5) has x = 3, so it is also invariant. (6, 1) has x = 6, so it is not invariant, since 6 is not equal to 3. Two of the three vertices are invariant. Answer: 2. Check EVERY vertex against the mirror line's equation rather than assuming a shape either keeps all its vertices fixed or none of them: a vertex is invariant only when it sits exactly on the line, and here two do and one does not.
- (b) (5, −3) — Method: rotate the point about the given centre first, then translate the image, in the stated order. Working: rotating (0, 2) by 180° about (2, 2) uses the rule (x, y) → (4 − x, 4 − y), since the centre doubles in each coordinate. This gives 4 − 0 = 4 and 4 − 2 = 2, so (0, 2) maps to (4, 2). Translating (4, 2) by the vector (1, −5) gives 4 + 1 = 5 and 2 − 5 = −3, so the final image is (5, −3). Answer: (5, −3). Rotate about the centre GIVEN in the question, (2, 2), not about the origin, and translate the rotated image afterwards, in that order: rotating about the wrong centre, swapping the order, or stopping after one step all give a different point.
- (a) 90° clockwise about (0, 0) — Two reflections in lines through a common point compose to a single rotation about that point, through an angle equal to twice the angle between the two lines, in the direction from the first line to the second. The line y = x makes a 45° angle with the line y = 0, so the resulting rotation turns through 2 × 45° = 90°; testing the point (1, 0) — which reflects to (0, 1) in y = x, then to (0, −1) in y = 0 — shows the turn is clockwise, about the origin where the two lines cross. Taking the rotation anticlockwise instead reverses the direction the two reflections actually compose in. Using 45° directly, without doubling the angle between the lines, gives an angle equal to only half the true rotation. Treating any pair of reflecting lines as perpendicular, and so always giving a 180° rotation, ignores that these two lines actually meet at 45°, not 90°.
- (b) (2, 3) — Applying A first: reflecting (2, 1) in the x-axis gives (2, −1). Applying B to that image: translating (2, −1) by (0, 4) gives (2, −1 + 4) = (2, 3). Applying the transformations in the opposite order — B first, then A — gives a different result: (2, 1) translates to (2, 5), which then reflects to (2, −5); this shows that the order genuinely matters here. Applying only A and stopping there, without the translation, gives (2, −1). Applying only B and stopping there, without the reflection, gives (2, 5). Do both transformations, in the order A then B, and the image of P is (2, 3).
- (b) −2 — The gradient of the original line is (6 − 2) ÷ (3 − 1) = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Reflecting in the x-axis sends every y-coordinate to its negative, which flips the sign of the gradient: the image line has gradient −2. Translating by (2, 0) is a horizontal shift, which does not change the line's steepness or direction at all, so the gradient stays at −2. Assuming the gradient is unaffected by the reflection gives 2, the original gradient carried straight through. Thinking a reflection in the x-axis turns a gradient into its positive reciprocal gives 1/2. Combining that same wrong idea with the sign flip from the reflection gives −1/2. Only the sign flips, from the reflection, and translating never changes a gradient at all, so the answer is −2.
- (c) (2, −3) — Method: apply the transformations in the order given, translation first, then reflection, to the point itself. Working: translating (5, 1) by the vector (−3, 2) moves the x-coordinate by −3 and the y-coordinate by 2, giving 5 − 3 = 2 and 1 + 2 = 3, so the image after the translation is (2, 3). Reflecting this point in the x-axis leaves the x-coordinate unchanged and reverses the sign of the y-coordinate, giving (2, −3). Answer: (2, −3). Do the two maps in the stated order and carry the point all the way through both of them: swapping the order, or stopping after the first map, lands you on a different point altogether.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.