Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 8.4 cm — Two sides and the angle between them are known, so use the cosine rule: BC² = AB² + AC² − 2 × AB × AC × cos(BAC). Substituting, BC² = 81 + 36 − 45.64 = 71.36. Taking the square root: BC = √71.36 = 8.4 cm (1 d.p.). Leaving out the factor of 2 in the formula gives BC² = 81 + 36 − 22.82 = 94.18, so BC = 9.7 cm. Adding the cosine term instead of subtracting it gives BC² = 81 + 36 + 45.64 = 162.64, so BC = 12.8 cm. Using sin65° in place of cos65° gives BC² = 81 + 36 − 97.88 = 19.12, so BC = 4.4 cm. Keep the factor of 2, subtract the cosine term, and the correct length is 8.4 cm.
- (b) (−2, −1) — Method: apply the reflection to the point first, then rotate the image about the given centre, in the order the question states them. Working: reflecting (3, 4) in the line y = 1 keeps x = 3 and puts the image as far below the line as the point is above it: 4 is 3 units above y = 1, so the image is 3 units below, at 1 − 3 = −2 (the same as 2 × 1 − 4 = −2). The reflected point is (3, −2). Rotating (3, −2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1): subtracting the centre gives 3 − 1 = 2 and −2 − 1 = −3, the clockwise rule swaps and negates these to give −3 and −2, and adding the centre back gives 1 + (−3) = −2 and 1 + (−2) = −1. The final image is (−2, −1). Answer: (−2, −1). Reflect before you rotate, exactly as the design process is described, and rotate about the CENTRE (1, 1) given in the question rather than the origin: either mistake, or reversing the two steps, sends the tile to a different point.
- (c) 49.5 m² — Method: the area formula needs two sides and the angle between them, and only sides are given, so find one angle with the cosine rule first and then use the two sides that enclose it. Working: angle ABC lies between AB = 14 m and BC = 9 m, so cos ABC = (14² + 9² − 11²) ÷ (2 × 14 × 9) = (196 + 81 − 121) ÷ 252 = 156 ÷ 252 = 0.61905, giving angle ABC = 51.753° and sin ABC = 0.78535. The area is then 1/2 × 14 × 9 × 0.78535 = 63 × 0.78535 = 49.477. Answer: the area is 49.5 m² to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 60.5 m² comes from using the correct angle at B with the sides 14 m and 11 m, which do not both meet at B, so the angle is no longer the one they enclose; 63.0 m² comes from leaving the sine out and treating the two sides as a base and a perpendicular height; 40.5 m² comes from working out angle BAC = 39.98° instead and using its sine with the sides that meet at B, so that the angle used is not the angle between them.
- (d) 77 — Method: angles that meet at a point add up to 360°. Working: 82 + 105 + 96 = 283; 360 − 283 = 77. Answer: 77°. A candidate who gives the sum of the three known angles and forgets to subtract it from 360° gets 283. A candidate who leaves out the 105° angle, working out 360 − 82 − 96, gets 182. A candidate who leaves out the 82° angle, working out 360 − 105 − 96, gets 159.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
- (a) 6 cm — Method: a rectangle is made of two lengths and two widths, so the perimeter is 2 × (length + width). Half the perimeter is therefore one length plus one width, and the width is what is left of that half once the length is taken away. Working: 30 ÷ 2 = 15 cm is one length added to one width, and 15 − 9 = 6. Answer: 6 cm. The distractors: 21 cm comes from taking the length off the whole perimeter, 30 − 9, so three sides are still counted in the figure that is written down; 12 cm comes from removing both lengths correctly, 30 − 2 × 9 = 12, and then recording that remainder as the width instead of halving it, because it is in fact the two widths together; 7.5 cm comes from dividing the perimeter by four, 30 ÷ 4, which is the calculation for the side of a square and throws away the length that was given.
- (c) £7.85 — Arc length = (90 ÷ 360) × 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 0.25 × 62.8 = 15.7 cm. Cost = 15.7 × £0.50 = £7.85. (£31.40 comes from finding the full circumference and forgetting the angle fraction; £15.70 comes from using the diameter, 20 cm, in place of the radius; £157.00 comes from multiplying the arc length by the radius instead of by the cost per centimetre.)
- (b) 2 cm — Method: the volume of a cube is edge × edge × edge, so finding the edge from the volume means undoing a cube, not a square or a halving. Working: edge × edge × edge = 8; testing whole numbers, 1 × 1 × 1 = 1 is too small and the next whole number gives 2 × 2 × 2 = 8, which matches. Answer: 2 cm. The distractors: 8 cm comes from writing the volume down as the edge length and changing only the unit; 4 cm comes from halving the volume, 8 ÷ 2, as though a cube were undone by dividing by 2; 2.83 cm is the square root of 8, from taking a square root where a cube root is needed.
- (c) RHS applies: the right angle, hypotenuse and one matching side are all equal — Both triangles are right-angled, and the hypotenuses (AC and DF) are equal, and one further pair of matching sides (AB and DE) are equal. This matches the Right angle-Hypotenuse-Side condition, which needs only these three facts, not a third side.
- (b) Neither, because both coordinates differ — A line segment is horizontal only when both points share the same y-coordinate, and vertical only when both points share the same x-coordinate. Here A has x-coordinate −4 and B has x-coordinate 2, which differ, and A has y-coordinate 3 and B has y-coordinate 6, which also differ, so the segment is neither horizontal nor vertical. Every point has a y-coordinate and an x-coordinate, so simply having one is not a reason for the line to be horizontal or vertical — both of those wrong reasons ignore that the coordinates must match, not just exist. The x-coordinates do increase from A to B, but an increasing x-coordinate on its own describes a slope, not a horizontal line.
- (b) (2, 3) — Applying A first: reflecting (2, 1) in the x-axis gives (2, −1). Applying B to that image: translating (2, −1) by (0, 4) gives (2, −1 + 4) = (2, 3). Applying the transformations in the opposite order — B first, then A — gives a different result: (2, 1) translates to (2, 5), which then reflects to (2, −5); this shows that the order genuinely matters here. Applying only A and stopping there, without the translation, gives (2, −1). Applying only B and stopping there, without the reflection, gives (2, 5). Do both transformations, in the order A then B, and the image of P is (2, 3).
- (a) −2 — Let the centre be C = (c, 0). The vector from the centre to the image equals the scale factor k times the vector from the centre to the object: (7 − c, −4) = k(1 − c, 2). The y-coordinate gives −4 = 2k, so k = −2 — this doesn't depend on knowing c. (Checking: substituting k = −2 into the x-equation gives c = 3, consistent with a centre on the x-axis.) '2' comes from taking the magnitude of the ratio without noticing the image is on the opposite side of the centre from the object, so the sign should be negative. '−1/2' comes from inverting the scale factor, dividing the object's coordinate by the image's instead of the other way round. '3' is the x-coordinate of the centre, mistaken for the scale factor.
- (b) (1, 6) — Method: when a square is set square-on to the grid, so that its sides run parallel to the axes, each vertex shares its x-coordinate with one neighbour and its y-coordinate with the other, and the missing vertex then borrows one coordinate from each of the two vertices it is joined to; so the first job is to check from the given points that the sides really do run parallel to the axes. Working: A(1, 2) and B(5, 2) share y = 2, so AB is a horizontal side; B(5, 2) and C(5, 6) share x = 5, so BC is a vertical side, which confirms that this square lies square-on to the axes and that the rule may be used. In square ABCD the vertex D is joined to C and to A. DC must be horizontal like AB, so D takes the y-coordinate of C, which is 6; DA must be vertical like CB, so D takes the x-coordinate of A, which is 1. D is therefore (1, 6), and checking confirms every side is 4 long. Answer: (1, 6). The distractors: (1, 5) comes from lifting the first number out of each of A and C, pairing the x-coordinate of A with the x-coordinate of C; (6, 1) comes from finding the right two numbers but writing them the wrong way round, height before sideways position; (9, 6) comes from stepping a further 4 to the right from C instead of closing the square back to the column A stands in.
- (c) ASA — Method: check which condition matches two angles and the side between them, since that is all the sailmaker has measured. Working: the 10 m side lies between the 50° and 75° angles in both panels, so this is two Angles and the included Side, ASA. Options: SAS would need two sides and the angle between them, but only one side has been measured here; SSS would need three sides, but only one is known; RHS needs a right angle and a hypotenuse, and neither panel has a stated right angle. Answer: ASA.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.