We have all heard both sides: 'screen time is bad for children' versus 'educational apps are the future'. The truth, as usual, is more complicated. What does the research actually say about maths games, and how can a parent tell whether the child is learning or just passing the time?
The argument: screen time versus digital learning
Every parent knows the moment: the child asks to play a maths game, and one parent says 'it's educational, let them' while the other looks at the clock and thinks 'another hour of screen'. This argument goes on in many homes, and not without reason — the question of screen time is one of the most fraught in raising the current generation.
Many health organisations recommend limiting children's screen time, while technology companies present research showing educational gains. In between are parents who just want to know: did my child sit for 40 minutes with the phone and learn something, or simply waste time?
The answer to that question is not found in an ideological position — neither 'screens are bad' nor 'technology will save education'. It is found in the research itself, and in the small details that separate a game that teaches from a game that entertains.
What the research actually says
Research into educational games has developed a great deal in the last decade. From analyses of dozens of studies of maths software and apps a complex picture emerges: children who play good-quality maths games regularly, over a period of at least six weeks, show measurable improvement in standardised tests of basic arithmetic — compared with groups that did not use digital tools. Some studies point to different rates of improvement depending on the quality of the game and how it is used.
But — and it is a big 'but' — that improvement was measured specifically in groups where the games were matched to the child's level, gave immediate feedback, and included an element of gradually increasing challenge. Games that did not meet those criteria showed no significant improvement — and sometimes even led children to develop a dependence on external stimulation.
The right question is not 'how long is the child playing?' but 'what is happening in their head while they play?'. Active practice that forces them to think and decide — even on a screen — is completely different from passive consumption of content.
Further studies have found that maths games are especially effective for building fluency — that is, speed and accuracy in basic operations. Arithmetic fluency is a cornerstone: a child who does not have to think about 7 × 8 can devote their working memory to more complex problems. This is exactly the area where quick-recall games show their greatest value — and it is the thinking behind the Year 4 Multiplication Tables Check.
The characteristics of a good maths game
Not every game with numbers in it is a good maths game. Research in digital education points to four key characteristics that separate a game that teaches from a game that entertains:
- Adaptive difficulty: the game recognises the child's level and adjusts the difficulty in real time. If the child has answered ten questions correctly in a row — they need a harder question, not another easy one. Too little challenge creates boredom; too much creates despair.
- Immediate, precise feedback: the child needs to know straight away if they were wrong — and why. 'Wrong: 6 × 7 is 42, not 48' is worth more than a fun animation that hides the mistake.
- Repetition without boredom: maths needs repetition. A good game presents the same operation in different forms — against the clock, with characters, in contexts — so the brain practises without switching off.
- An achievement element: points, ranks, challenges, a leaderboard — each of these triggers real motivation mechanisms. A child who sees they have gone up a rank will play for a few more minutes — and every minute is more practice.
Bad maths games — how to spot them
The market is full of apps and games that present themselves as 'educational' but in practice use the child as a source of advertising revenue. A few red flags worth recognising:
- Adverts mid-play: an advert that appears in the middle of an exercise breaks concentration and teaches the child that learning comes with ad breaks — a bad message.
- A one-way path with no choice: the child cannot choose a topic, a difficulty or a game mode. They go through a fixed series with no flexibility — which drains motivation fast.
- Winning too easily: if the child always feels like a winner, something is wrong. A game that never challenges develops nothing.
- Noise without content: dazzling animations, frantic music and a flood of effects that hide shallow questions. The child may feel they have learnt a lot — but in practice answered ten simple questions.
- An interface built around purchases: the good content sits behind a hidden paywall, and 'the next level' always costs money.
How to choose a suitable game by age
The child's age affects both the topics that need practising and the kind of presentation that suits them cognitively:
| Age / year group | Key topics to practise | What to look for in a game |
|---|---|---|
| Years 1-2 (5-7) | Addition and subtraction to 100, counting, odd/even | Characters, stories, visual demonstrations, a slow pace |
| Years 3-4 (7-9) | Times tables, division, first fractions | Racing the clock, leaderboards, short challenges |
| Years 5-6 (9-11) | Percentages, decimals, area and perimeter | Word problems, work on speed and accuracy |
| Years 7-8 (11-13) | Basic algebra, equations, ratio | Step-by-step explanations, graphical visualisation |
Beyond chronological age, it is important to match the actual level. A Year 4 child who still struggles with times tables needs to strengthen the basics first — and a game that assumes they already know them will frustrate rather than help.
The right balance: games, traditional practice and school
Maths games are a tool — not a complete solution. A child who plays a maths game for 15 minutes a day and skips their homework will not see improvement in a test. But a child who combines:
- Learning in class (understanding the new idea)
- Traditional written practice (solving problems, orderly work with pen and paper)
- Digital revision (building fluency and speed through a game)
— is the one who gets the most out of it. Each of these elements activates a different part of the learning process. The classroom structures and explains; the paper demands accuracy and systematic work; the game builds fluency and motivation.
Studies of blending digital tools with traditional teaching show that the combined approach beats either on its own. It is not a race between 'old' and 'new' — it is about using each tool cleverly according to its strength.
Practical recommendations for parents
If you are considering bringing maths games into your child's routine, here are a few practical recommendations:
- Set a short, fixed time: 10-20 minutes after homework, not an hour before bed. Consistency matters more than length.
- Play with them the first time: understand what the game asks for, whether it challenges the child, and what happens when they get something wrong.
- Check there are no adverts: ad-free premium versions are worth the small outlay if the game is good.
- Vary: do not rely on one game. Several different tools (including written practice) beat dependence on a single platform.
- Talk about what they learnt: ask 'what was hardest today?' — a short conversation joins digital learning with verbal processing.
- Do not compromise on bedtime: tiredness harms learning more than any other factor. If the choice is between an hour of sleep and an educational game — sleep always wins.
One of the tools that tries to meet these standards is MathsUK — a platform offering maths games for Years 1-8, with no adverts and rising difficulty. There are several options such as the defence game, the owls game and more — one of a number of options worth knowing about and trying. Its free tier is genuinely free, and you can try it before deciding.
In the end, the parent is the lighthouse. No app replaces presence, interest and questions. But when a good maths game joins that kind of environment — it can make a child love numbers, not just put up with them.
Frequently asked questions
Do maths games really teach, or do they just entertain?
Both — and it depends on the game. Studies show that good-quality games with adaptive challenge and immediate feedback improve arithmetic fluency by around 9-15% after six weeks of regular use. Games that demand active thinking are completely different from passive consumption of content.
How long a day should a child play maths games?
Research points to 15-25 minutes a day as an effective dose. More important than quantity is regularity — two or three times a week consistently beats one long hour at the weekend.
How do you know if a maths game suits the child's level?
If the child always feels like a winner and never meets a challenge — the game is too easy. If they are frustrated and want to give up within a few minutes — the game is too hard. A good game makes the child concentrate and sometimes ask for 'just one more minute' even though the time is up.
Is a paid app better than a free one?
Not necessarily. The important factor is the absence of adverts and the quality of the content, not the price. There are free, ad-free apps that work brilliantly, and paid apps that are not worth the money. Try before you pay, and check that no adverts interrupt.
Does it matter whether the game follows the National Curriculum?
For younger children it matters a lot — a game that uses the same methods and vocabulary as school (number bonds, bar models, formal written methods) reduces the cognitive load and lets them focus on the maths. From Year 6 upwards a child with secure basics can use good international platforms, as long as the topics line up with what they are doing in class.
Do maths games replace homework?
No, and it is not helpful to think of them that way. They complement — building fluency and motivation — but homework teaches orderly work, writing full solutions and tackling complex problems. Both are needed.
My child hates maths — will a game help?
Often yes, provided you start at a level they can manage and where they feel success. A child who experiences a small success in a game begins to change their inner narrative about maths. But if there is a structural difficulty — it is important to check with the teacher and consider extra support too.
How are maths games different from worksheets?
Both practise, but differently. Worksheets demand sustained concentration, systematic work and writing — important skills. Games provide immediate feedback, motivation through winning elements, and allow intensive repetition in a short time. A combination of the two is more effective than either alone.
Try them free — no sign-up, no adverts
Discover our games ←