Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 5 × 10⁻³ — Method: in standard form the coefficient must be at least 1 and less than 10, and for a number smaller than 1 the index is negative and counts the places the decimal point moves to the right. Working: the only significant digit is 5, so the coefficient is 5; moving the decimal point in 0.005 three places to the right gives 5, so the index is −3. Answer: 5 × 10⁻³. The distractors: 0.5 × 10⁻² is the same value written the wrong way, because 0.5 is smaller than 1 and so is not an allowed coefficient; 5 × 10⁻² comes from counting the two zeros after the decimal point instead of the three places the point moves; 5 × 10³ comes from taking the index as positive, which describes a number in the thousands rather than one smaller than 1.
- (b) 20 — F = 4s, so when s = 5, F = 4 × 5 = 20. 9 comes from adding 4 and 5 instead of multiplying, the mistake described in the question. 25 comes from squaring s (5²) instead of multiplying by 4. 45 comes from writing the digits 4 and 5 next to each other instead of carrying out the multiplication.
- (a) 15 : 12 — Multiply both parts of the ratio 5 : 4 by the same number, 3, to get an equivalent ratio: 5 × 3 = 15 and 4 × 3 = 12, giving 15 : 12. Giving 15 : 16 multiplies the two parts by different scale factors (×3 and ×4), which changes the ratio. Giving 9 : 8 adds 4 to each part instead of multiplying, which also changes the ratio. Giving 4 : 5 swaps the order of the two parts.
- (a) ∠QRS — Method: the middle letter in three-letter angle notation is always the vertex of the angle, and the outer two letters are the neighbouring vertices along the shape's sides. Working: at vertex R, the two adjacent vertices along the pentagon are Q and S, so the interior angle is written ∠QRS, with R in the middle. Options: ∠PQR names the angle at Q, not R, since Q is the middle letter there; ∠RST puts R first rather than in the middle, so it actually names the angle at S; ∠TRP does have R in the middle, but T and P are not the vertices adjacent to R along the pentagon's sides, so it does not describe R's interior angle. Answer: ∠QRS.
- (c) 24 — Silver, bronze and copper cover every counter, so their probabilities sum to 1: P(copper) = 1 − 1/2 − 1/8 = 3/8. Number of copper counters = 3/8 × 64 = 24. Multiplying the silver probability by 64 gives 32, the number of silver counters, not copper. Multiplying the bronze probability by 64 gives 8, the number of bronze counters. Adding the silver and bronze probabilities (1/2 + 1/8 = 5/8) and multiplying by 64 gives 40, the combined number of silver and bronze counters, not the copper count.
- (b) 120, unreliable — x = 25 is outside 1 to 12 — The line of best fit is y = 4x + 20. 4 × 25 = 100, and 100 + 20 = 120, so the estimate is y = 120. But x = 25 lies far outside the plotted range of 1 to 12 years, so this is an extrapolation, and the estimate is not reliable. Reaching 100 instead of 120 comes from 4 × 25 = 100 with the intercept of 20 left out — still correctly flagged as unreliable, but the wrong value. Calling the estimate reliable simply because it was calculated correctly, giving 120, wrongly assumes that a correct calculation is automatically trustworthy, ignoring that x = 25 lies far beyond the data actually collected. Reaching 68, from 4 × 12 = 48 and 48 + 20 = 68, substitutes x = 12, the top of the plotted range, instead of the assistant's actual x = 25, and wrongly calls that reliable because 12 lies inside the range.
- (c) 43 — Method: work out each power separately before adding. Working: 3³ = 27 and 2⁴ = 16, so 3³ + 2⁴ = 27 + 16 = 43. Answer: 43. (25 comes from using 3² instead of 3³, giving 9 + 16. 35 comes from working out 2⁴ as 2 × 4 = 8 instead of 2 × 2 × 2 × 2, giving 27 + 8. 432 comes from multiplying the two powers together instead of adding them.)
- (a) 4x + 2 — Expand the bracket: 4(x − 2) = 4x − 8. Then add the 10 that follows the bracket: 4x − 8 + 10 = 4x + 2. The option 4x − 8 comes from expanding the bracket correctly but then forgetting to add the 10. The option 4x + 8 comes from forgetting to multiply the 2 inside the bracket by 4 (treating it as 4x − 2 instead of 4x − 8), then adding 10. The option 4x + 18 comes from a sign error when expanding — treating 4 × (−2) as +8 instead of −8, giving 4x + 8, then adding 10.
- (b) 4:9 — 4 : 9 has no common factor other than 1, so it is already in its simplest form. 6 : 8 can be divided by 2 to give 3 : 4, so it is not simplest. 10 : 15 can be divided by 5 to give 2 : 3, so it is not simplest. 7 : 14 can be divided by 7 to give 1 : 2, so it is not simplest.
- (a) 7.2 cm — The distance around the mat is the circumference, π × diameter = 3.14 × 20 = 62.8 cm. Yasmin started with 70 cm, so the ribbon left over is 70 − 62.8 = 7.2 cm. 62.8 cm is the circumference itself, the amount of ribbon used, not what is left over. 50 cm comes from subtracting the diameter instead of the circumference: 70 − 20 = 50. 20 cm is simply the diameter of the mat and involves no calculation with the ribbon length at all.
- (b) 6/25 — The probability of winning on any one spin is 2/5, and the probability of losing on any one spin is 3/5. Since the spins are independent, multiply the probability of winning on the first spin by the probability of losing on the second spin: 2/5 × 3/5 = 6/25. A candidate who answers 4/25 has used the winning probability for both spins, 2/5 × 2/5. A candidate who answers 9/25 has used the losing probability for both spins, 3/5 × 3/5. A candidate who answers 3/10 has treated the spins as if they were dependent, reducing the second spin's denominator to 4.
- (a) −15 °C — Method: the lowest temperature is the reading furthest to the left on a number line, and among negative readings that is the one furthest below zero. Working: the three negative readings are 1 degree, 7 degrees and 15 degrees below zero, and 0 °C is not below zero at all. Fifteen degrees below zero is the furthest below. Answer: −15 °C. The distractors: −1 °C comes from ordering the negatives by the size of their digits, so that the smallest digit is taken as the lowest temperature; −7 °C comes from comparing 15 and 7 by their leading digits, deciding that 1 is less than 7 and so that −7 lies below −15; 0 °C comes from treating zero as the smallest number there is.
- (d) 3 — Method: add the constant term to both sides first, then divide by the coefficient of x. Working: 3x = 4 + 5 = 9; x = 9 ÷ 3 = 3. Answer: x = 3. −1/3 comes from a sign error when moving the 5, subtracting instead of adding: 3x = 4 − 5 = −1, then x = −1/3. 6 comes from subtracting the coefficient 3 instead of dividing by it: 9 − 3 = 6. 9 comes from correctly finding 3x = 9 but forgetting to divide by 3.
- (c) 20 cm — Convert 5 km to centimetres: 5 km = 5000 m = 500 000 cm. Divide by the scale factor: 500 000 ÷ 25 000 = 20, giving 20 cm. Converting only as far as metres, 5000 ÷ 25 000 = 0.2, gives 0.2 cm — the conversion to centimetres was never finished. Dropping a zero in the division gives 2 cm, ten times too small. Misreading the scale as 1 : 2500 instead of 1 : 25 000 gives 500 000 ÷ 2500 = 200 cm, ten times too big.
- (a) £4.20 — 350 g is 3.5 lots of 100 g, since 350 ÷ 100 = 3.5, so the cost is 3.5 × £1.20 = £4.20. Multiplying the mass in grams directly by the price, without dividing by 100 first, gives £420.00. Working out 100 ÷ 350 instead of 350 ÷ 100 inverts the ratio and gives about £0.34. Rounding 350 g down to 300 g gives 3 × £1.20 = £3.60.
- (c) Ben: 2 × 3 = 6, then 6 + 6 = 12 — Multiplication has priority over addition, so 2 × 3 = 6 is worked out first, then 6 + 6 = 12 — this is Ben's method. Amy adds 6 and 2 before multiplying: 6 + 2 = 8, then 8 × 3 = 24, breaking the priority rule. Chen multiplies the wrong pair of numbers, 6 and 2, instead of 2 and 3: 6 × 2 = 12, then 12 + 3 = 15. Dev applies the right order but slips when multiplying, using 5 instead of 6 for 2 × 3, so the final step becomes 6 + 5 = 11.
- (b) (0, −2) — Method: a translation acts on the two coordinates separately: moving right or left changes the x-coordinate only, moving up or down changes the y-coordinate only, and right and up add while left and down subtract. Working: the point starts at (−4, 7); moving 4 units to the right gives an x-coordinate of −4 + 4 = 0; moving 9 units down gives a y-coordinate of 7 − 9 = −2. Answer: (0, −2). The distractors: (5, 3) comes from pairing each number with the wrong coordinate, adding 9 to −4 and taking 4 from 7; (0, 16) comes from treating 'down' as an addition, giving 7 + 9 = 16 for the second coordinate; (−8, −2) comes from treating 'to the right' as a subtraction, giving −4 − 4 = −8 for the first coordinate.
- (d) 25 minutes — Method: find the time for one kilometre, then multiply by the number of kilometres — the unitary method with a rate. Working: 10 ÷ 2 = 5 minutes per km, and 5 × 5 = 25. Answer: 25 minutes. The distractors: 20 minutes comes from multiplying the 10 minutes by 2, the distance in the given rate, instead of by the scale factor 2.5; 50 minutes comes from multiplying 10 by 5, treating the 10 minutes as the time for a single kilometre; 15 minutes comes from adding the 5 km on to the 10 minutes, adding quantities that are not the same kind.
- (a) 2/3 — Total parts = 6 + 4 + 5 = 15. Sopranos and altos together are not tenors: 6 + 4 = 10 parts, so the fraction is 10/15, which simplifies to 2/3. 1/3 comes from finding the fraction of tenors instead of the fraction that is not tenors. 2/5 comes from counting only the sopranos as not tenors and leaving the altos out. 4/9 comes from leaving sopranos out of the total, 4 + 5 = 9, and then using only the altos as the fraction that is not tenors.
- (c) £624.32 — A 4% rise is a multiplier of 1.04, applied once each year. After year 1: 5000 × 1.04 = 5200. After year 2: 5200 × 1.04 = 5408. After year 3: 5408 × 1.04 = 5624.32. The question asks for the interest, not the value of the account, so take away the amount invested at the start: 5624.32 − 5000 = 624.32. The total interest earned is £624.32.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.