Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 590 — To round to the nearest 10, decide which multiple of 10 the number is nearer to. 592.5 lies between 590 and 600. It is 592.5 − 590 = 2.5 above 590, but 600 − 592.5 = 7.5 below 600, so it is much nearer to 590. Equivalently, the units digit is 2, and 2 is less than 5, so round down: 592.5 rounds to 590. A candidate who wrote 600 rounded up because of the 5 in the tenths place, but that digit decides rounding to the nearest whole number, not to the nearest 10 — the units digit is what matters here. A candidate who wrote 595 rounded to the nearest 5 instead of the nearest 10. A candidate who wrote 500 cut the number down to its hundreds digit instead of rounding to the nearest 10.
- (a) y = −3x − 5 — Gradient = (−8 − 4) ÷ (1 − (−3)) = −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Using the point (1, −8): −8 = −3(1) + c, so c = −5, giving y = −3x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the gradient, using m = 3 instead, would then solve −8 = 3(1) + c to get c = −11, writing y = 3x − 11. A candidate who makes a sign error isolating c, writing c = 5 instead of −5, would write y = −3x + 5. A candidate who mixes up both mistakes — keeping the correct gradient but the wrong, positive value of c from the flipped-gradient calculation — would write y = −3x + 11.
- (d) 3/5 — Put the school journey time over the gym journey time: 12/20. Divide both numbers by their highest common factor, 4: 12÷4 = 3, 20÷4 = 5, giving 3/5. (5/3 comes from writing the times the wrong way round. 2/5 comes from finding the difference in the times, 20 − 12 = 8 minutes, and writing it as a fraction of the gym time, 8/20. 3/8 comes from comparing the school time to the total time for both journeys, 12/32.)
- (b) 13 — Using the sum of interior angles formula, (n − 2) × 180° = 1980°, so n − 2 = 1980 ÷ 180 = 11, and n = 11 + 2 = 13. 11 stops after the division, forgetting to add 2 back to find n. 15 adds 2 twice by mistake, giving 11 + 2 + 2. 22 divides 1980 by 90 instead of 180.
- (d) 1/3 — List the outcomes for the two spinners systematically in a 3 × 3 grid: 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 2-1, 2-2, 2-3, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, where the first number is the score on spinner A and the second is the score on spinner B — 9 equally likely outcomes in total. The pairs where the two numbers are the same are 1-1, 2-2 and 3-3, so there are 3 favourable outcomes. P(same number) = 3/9 = 1/3. 2/3 comes from working out the probability that the two numbers are different and then forgetting to take the complement the right way round, so the probability of "different" is given instead of the probability of "same". 1/2 comes from listing only the 6 unordered pairs 1-1, 2-2, 3-3, 1-2, 1-3, 2-3 instead of all 9 ordered outcomes in the grid, then taking 3 out of that 6. 1/9 comes from spotting only one of the three matching pairs, such as 1-1, and missing 2-2 and 3-3.
- (a) x = 0 gives y = −20: a negative number sold — The y-intercept is the value the line predicts when x = 0: y = 3 × 0 − 20 = −20. A kiosk cannot sell a negative number of ice creams, so this is not a sensible estimate. The 3 in the equation is the gradient, not the intercept, so an option claiming x = 0 gives y = 3 has swapped the two numbers around — substituting x = 0 makes the 3x term equal 0, leaving −20, not 3. The danger of extrapolating to very high temperatures is a real issue with this line, but it is a different issue from the y-intercept, so it does not answer this question. And whether x = 0 could occur on a trading day is beside the point: the model still makes that prediction, and it is the prediction itself, −20, that is impossible.
- (b) 5² — Method: multiplying two powers of the same base adds their indices, and a negative index is added as a negative number. Working: −2 + 4 = 2, so 5⁻² × 5⁴ = 5². Answer: 5². The distractors: 5⁶ comes from adding the sizes of the indices, 2 + 4, and ignoring the minus sign; 5⁻⁸ comes from multiplying the indices, −2 × 4, instead of adding them; 5⁻⁶ comes from subtracting the indices, −2 − 4, as though the powers were being divided.
- (a) x = 3/2 or x = −3/2 — Method: the equation has an x² term and a number but no x term, so make x² the subject and then take the square root of both sides, keeping the negative root as well as the positive one. Working: adding 9 to both sides of 4x² − 9 = 0 gives 4x² = 9, and dividing both sides by 4 gives x² = 9/4. Square-rooting the top and the bottom of 9/4 gives 3/2, so x = 3/2 or x = −3/2, and each value checks out because 4 × 9/4 − 9 = 0. Answer: x = 3/2 or x = −3/2. The distractors: x = 3 or x = −3 comes from square-rooting both sides of 4x² = 9 without first dividing by the 4, so the coefficient of x² is ignored; x = 9/4 or x = −9/4 comes from stopping at x² = 9/4 and writing that value down as x, leaving the square root undone; x = 3/2 only comes from taking the positive square root of 9/4 and losing the negative solution.
- (c) 2 hours — Method: time = distance ÷ speed, and the units of the speed fix the unit of the time. Working: 120 ÷ 60 = 2, and because the speed is in kilometres per hour the time is in hours. Answer: 2 hours. The distractors: 0.5 hours comes from dividing the speed by the distance, 60 ÷ 120, the division the wrong way round; 2 minutes comes from the correct division but the wrong unit, reading kilometres per hour as kilometres per minute; 180 minutes comes from adding 120 and 60 instead of dividing.
- (b) 50 cm² — Method: the area of a rectangle is length × width. Working: 2 × 25 = 50. Answer: 50 cm². The distractors: 54 cm comes from working out the perimeter, 2 × (2 + 25), which is a length and not an area; 27 cm comes from adding the two sides, 2 + 25, instead of multiplying them; 25 cm² comes from halving the product, 50 ÷ 2, which is the rule for the area of a triangle rather than of a rectangle.
- (a) 3,860 — The probability a bulb works correctly is the complement of being defective: 1 − 0.035 = 0.965. Expected number working correctly = 0.965 × 4,000 = 3,860. Using the probability of being defective instead of its complement gives 4,000 × 0.035 = 140, the expected number of DEFECTIVE bulbs, not working ones. Shifting the decimal point in the complement, using 0.0965 instead of 0.965, gives 4,000 × 0.0965 = 386. Assuming every bulb works, ignoring the 0.035 probability altogether, gives the full batch of 4,000.
- (b) 4 — Method: list the factors of each number and compare them; the highest common factor is the largest number that appears in both lists. Working: the factors of 20 are 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 20; the factors of 32 are 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32. The numbers that appear in both lists are 1, 2 and 4, and the largest of these is 4. 2 is a common factor of 20 and 32 but not the largest one. 8 is a factor of 32 but not of 20, since 20 ÷ 8 is not a whole number. 160 is the lowest common multiple of 20 and 32, not their highest common factor. Answer: 4.
- (a) x ≈ 6.70 — Since the two roots sum to 7, the other root is 7 − 0.30 = 6.70. The option 7.30 comes from adding the given root to 7 instead of subtracting it. The option 6.30 comes from subtracting 0.70 (one minus the given root) rather than the given root itself. The option 0.70 confuses the required root with the amount by which the given root falls short of 1.
- (c) 15 — Method: the number of cakes is in direct proportion to the mass of flour, so find the multiplier between the two masses and apply it to the number of cakes. Working: 6 ÷ 2 = 3, so there is three times as much flour, and 5 × 3 = 15. Answer: 15. The distractors: 10 comes from multiplying the 5 cakes by 2, the mass in the recipe, instead of by the multiplier 3; 20 comes from multiplying by the difference 6 − 2 = 4, treating a proportion problem as a difference problem; 12 comes from rounding 5 ÷ 2 down to 2 cakes per kilogram and working out 6 × 2.
- (a) 143° — Angles on a straight line add up to 180°. Set up 37° + x = 180°. Subtract: x = 180° − 37° = 143°. 53° comes from using 90° as the total, as if the two angles made a right angle, instead of the 180° of a straight line.
- (c) 6 — 2 × 3 = 6, then 36 ÷ 6 = 6. Ignoring the brackets and working left to right gives 36 ÷ 2 = 18, then 18 × 3 = 54. Multiplying by the bracket instead of dividing by it gives 2 × 3 = 6, then 36 × 6 = 216. Dividing by only the 2 inside the bracket, and ignoring the × 3, gives 36 ÷ 2 = 18.
- (a) −2 and 2 — Method: the graph crosses the x-axis where y = 0, so read the two crossing points straight off the curve. Working: the curve meets the horizontal axis two squares to the left of the origin and two squares to the right, at x = −2 and x = 2. Answer: −2 and 2. Distractor refutation: −4 and 4 comes from reading the value where the curve crosses the y-axis, −4, and using that value and its positive partner as the x-axis crossings instead. −2 and 3 comes from misreading the right-hand crossing point one square out along the grid, taking it where the curve is already above the axis. 0 and 2 comes from confusing the lowest point of the curve, which sits on the y-axis at x = 0, with one of the crossing points.
- (d) 20 — Gradient = change in T ÷ change in t = (140 − 60) ÷ (6 − 2) = 80 ÷ 4 = 20. A student who subtracts in the wrong order gets −20. A student who divides 80 by 2 instead of 4 gets 40. A student who wrongly treats the line as passing through the origin and uses the point (2, 60) on its own gets 60 ÷ 2 = 30.
- (d) 23,600 — 23,000 correct to the nearest thousand means the true attendance, a, satisfies 22,500 ≤ a < 23,500. 23,600 is outside this range, so it is not possible. 22,500 is the lower bound of the range, so it is possible. 23,499 is just below the upper bound, so it is possible. 23,000 is the given value itself, so it is possible.
- (b) 1.5 km — Multiply the map length by the scale factor: 6 × 25000 = 150000 cm. Convert to kilometres, using 100 cm = 1 m and 1000 m = 1 km, so 100000 cm = 1 km: 150000 ÷ 100000 = 1.5 km. (1500 km comes from converting only as far as metres, 150000 ÷ 100 = 1500 m, and then writing kilometres on the end. 15 km comes from dividing by 10000 instead of 100000. 0.15 km comes from dividing by 1000000 instead of 100000.)
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.